274
top 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] syklemil@discuss.tchncs.de 31 points 1 day ago

Between that and the uutils-coreutils, Ubuntu 25.10 sounds like it'll be an interesting experience for users, especially those with accessibility and internationalisation needs.

[-] trevor 20 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I fully agree with you on the accessibility front. It's not even good on X11, but it's unusable on Wayland, from what I understand :( Accessibility on Linux needs a massive funding and development initiative, and it needed to be done a long time ago.

But uutils is pretty solid. I've swapped out my GNU coreutils entirely (on Arch, not Ubuntu, because I value my time too much to be troubleshooting broken snaps) and haven't run into any issues. I think people are underestimating how close the compatibility already is. I'm sure something I use at some point will try to invoke an option that doesn't exist in the uutils version, but it's been solid for me so far.

[-] TheWilliamist@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago

It’s not the viability of the rust replacement of uutils that is the core of my issue. My issue is that mature code that has been tested, audited, and is stable has been removed for no viable reason other than it could have bugs.

[-] trevor 6 points 11 hours ago

It's not for no viable reason. Rust is just safer than C. There absolutely are bugs with GNU coreutils, so it's not even a hypothetical like you implied. But beyond safety, some of the Rust equivalents are more performant than their C counterparts.

And uutils is already heavily tested against the GNU coreutils. It's not some fly-by-night rewrite that people aren't serious about. I don't know if it's been formally audited yet, but it absolutely will be when companies like Canonical (and hopefully SUSE and Red Hat, one day) want to start shipping them.

[-] syklemil@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 day ago

Yeah, I think those are just lacking in the internationalisation?

People like me, who at most have some reading glasses needs and have their computer set to generally English utf-8 will be likely be fine.

[-] trevor 2 points 1 day ago

internationalization

Interesting point. I don't actually know about that. What can the GNU coreutils do with regard to internationalization? Just the output of commands, or can they also internationalize stuff like command args?

[-] syklemil@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I'm generally an en_*.UTF-8 user (even tried en_DK.UTF-8 for a bit for a reason we'll come back to), so I don't have a complete picture of it and would have to go look at the documentation or source for that, but I'd expect

  • documentation
  • date formats: en_DK.UTF-8 should give you ISO8601-formatted dates, if I can't have that I at least want DD/MM/YYYY; the US-american nonsense is just plain unacceptable
  • sorting: e.g. Norwegian will have …zæøå and expect aa to be sorted as å, the Swedes have …zåöä, the Germans …zäöü, the Turks will want ı and İ sorted and upper/lowercased correctly, and there are some options around how you deal with "foreign" letters and diacritics.
  • Probably more stuff relating to LC_* that I can't think of off the top of my head

but in any case, an ls -l output should be different depending on your locale, and in ways you likely don't even think about as long as it looks normal.

[-] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 6 points 1 day ago

Well, they do recommend using LTS releases and the specifically change stuff more drastically on the release before the next LTS release.

[-] syklemil@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 13 hours ago

Yeah, I think the fact that the next LTS will be 26.04 is the driver here, I just get the impression that things might get a little rocky and that they might've been better off had the next LTS been further into the future.

But it'll be a real smoke test release, at least. Hopefully they have enough resources to fix the issues that are uncovered, and don't wind up reverting for the LTS, or with a crummy LTS.

[-] Anomalocaris@lemm.ee 57 points 1 day ago
[-] zloubida@sh.itjust.works 47 points 1 day ago
[-] carotte 37 points 1 day ago

but it doesn’t work perfectly, xeyes through XWayland only follows your cursor if it’s hovering another XWayland window

which makes it a fun way to see which apps use XWayland tho!

[-] thingsiplay@beehaw.org 33 points 1 day ago

KDE has you covered. Someone made an applet that works on Wayland too: https://github.com/luisbocanegra/plasma-cursor-eyes

[-] wagesj45@fedia.io 50 points 1 day ago

Hope they're gonna devote the development resources to making it actually work.

[-] thingsiplay@beehaw.org 30 points 1 day ago

While it actually works, there are truly some missing features obviously. The hope is, when lot of major distributions and desktop environments stop supporting X11, then application developers and Wayland developers have to find a solution quicker. This will accelerate development of Wayland, at least the remaining issues.

One area where Wayland needs to improve is support for various accessibility features.

[-] notabot@piefed.social 26 points 1 day ago

That does feel rther like jumping out of a plane and hoping you can finish making your paracute before it's too late.

The concept of moving on from X11 is a good one, but making Wayland just a protocol that every compositor has to implement separately, and having so many optional larts to the spec seems like a guarantee that the ecosystem around it will never properly mature.

The KiCad developers have a good article about some of the issues with Wayland here.

[-] plumbercraic@lemmy.sdf.org 11 points 1 day ago

Oh wow. I am suddenly less excited about our Wayland future.

Damn yeah. Just the window managment issues are a complete no go for any productive work.

[-] PokerChips@programming.dev 2 points 1 day ago

I actually see this working out in the long run at least. In the mean time, there will be a lot of creativity while everyone tries to "invent the wheel" while great ideas perculate up during the stabalization phase.

[-] HakFoo@lemmy.sdf.org 11 points 1 day ago

This is big "if we break your old toys, you'll HAVE to play with the new ones" energy.

Tell me when they port FVWM. Seriously. FvwmButtons-- a pretty trivial dock except it can swallow other windows-- seems like it would be out-of-bounds on Wayland unless it was owned by the compositor itself to access the other windows. I don't see any of the new taskbar-tools used with Wayland compositors offering similar functionality (I could be wrong) and that seems an amazing loss of feature parity.

[-] Gnugit@aussie.zone 20 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

How is wayland nvidia gaming at the moment?

Several months ago I tried gaming on wayland with nvidia and it was completely broken for me.

[-] Nora@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 day ago

I've got an nvidia card and I've personally got no complaints about Wayland! been using it for some time to much success, I feel like x11 is just 'off' in comparison.

[-] disco@lemdro.id 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Just make sure the kernel modules are enabled and so are the systemd services. Shouldn't have a problem. It's been butter since they released the VRR fix a few months ago

[-] Gnugit@aussie.zone 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Could you please guide me to relevant documentation for this?

For now I'll just start at the Arch wiki for wayland.

[-] murvel@feddit.nu 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Depends on the desktop environment in my experience. On Fedora Gnome it was an unstable mess with my Nvidia RTX card but Fedora KDE Plasma has been stable.

[-] Gnugit@aussie.zone 2 points 1 day ago

It was mainly on Nobara but I guess my negative experience also followed me from troubles in debian early 2024.

[-] BassTurd@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I've been gaming with a 2080ti in Wayland for about a year now. I can't say I've had any issues related to my graphics card at all. The only hiccups I've had are with a couple of games, maybe two, that I had to tweak to run. They were known issues with public fixes. It's been a great experience.

There was an issue a few months back with multi monitor setups. Anytime I changed a monitor input, it would hard lock. It's fixed now.

[-] RedstoneValley@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

Games worked for me on Kubuntu, but a lot of other things were seriously broken. Compositor/Desktop effects did not work at all, weird screen artifacts, Taskbar crashes, Discord lags terribly and has display problems. I don't know, if that is going to be the new Desktop experience, we're gonna have a problem.

[-] Hegz@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 day ago

Several months ago I had a similar experience. Even just running plasma with Wayland+Nvidia was enough to cause problems.

[-] Gnugit@aussie.zone 4 points 1 day ago

This was my experience. I could barely even get my machine to run.

[-] Blubber28@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

It works just fine for me on my RTX 3060 Ti. No significant performance decrease or stuttering at all (except in Cities Skylines II but that's not Wayland's fault)

this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2025
274 points (100.0% liked)

Linux

7983 readers
351 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system

Also check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS