245
submitted 17 hours ago by tonytins@pawb.social to c/politics@lemmy.world
top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] catty@lemmy.world 7 points 2 hours ago

Totally nothing to do with Trump's own personal crypto currency scheme.

[-] Jhex@lemmy.world 5 points 2 hours ago

Grift on steriods... here we go

[-] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 5 points 4 hours ago

Sure! Let's pass a bill protecting shady people who make up a new money token that only a small percentage of citizens have access to. The American Nightmare. Jeebus Crepes!

[-] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 7 points 7 hours ago

summary: scammers ignore risks to the financial system

[-] MeekerThanBeaker@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago

Money, in general, is ridiculous.

Green paper, gold rocks, digital numbers.

Let's go back to the barter system... or bartender system... whichever.

[-] Djinn_Indigo@lemm.ee 4 points 5 hours ago

You know, I've heard that the barter system, as a foundation of economics, is essentially made up. Like, obviously people barter, but the idea that it was a universal precursor to money was essentially invented by capitalists in the industrial era, who never could have dreamed of the myriad interesting ways thar people distributed wealth!

Apparently one of the more common ones was a sort of "gifting" system, where people just gave each other what they needed. 🤷 But of course this wasn't universal either.

[-] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 18 points 12 hours ago

So if I get this right, people will exchange the dollar, a fiat currency, for a stablecoin. The stablecoin, itself, being a fiat currency.

So basically, if I want to own something that isn't purely speculative, I'm going to be forced to own real estate or gold?

What's the point of all this liquidity?!!?!

[-] kautau@lemmy.world 24 points 12 hours ago

To quickly move financial assets out from the country in a way that is difficult or impossible to reverse or track

[-] pulsewidth@lemmy.world 11 points 11 hours ago

See you all in 2 years when the market absolutely crashes and we're (globally) bailing out the financial system again.

[-] lupusblackfur@lemmy.world 58 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

The Senate gave its stamp of approval on Wednesday to a massive and growing chunk of the cryptocurrency industry, blessing it with a light-touch regulatory regime that, experts say, may come with a price tag: the stability of the country’s financial system.

Yeah, thinking that the demise of the USD($) and its attached system is the point.

Easiest way to get out from under the "onerous regulations" in the current financial system is to eradicate that system and replace it with the scam/multilevel market that is crypto (having little to no regulation).

When entities make their own "coins", they'll be able to write the rules enabling the Robber Barons/Tech Bros to fuck us even harder than they are accomplishing now.

🙄 🤡 🤷‍♂️ 🖕 💩

[-] ramble81@lemmy.zip 10 points 13 hours ago

Yup. Just wait until every company only accepts its own crypto. Who needs fiat currency.

[-] oxysis 6 points 11 hours ago

Company scrip 2.0

[-] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 10 points 12 hours ago

Also paving the way for employees to be paid in scrip.

[-] BoycottPro@lemm.ee 22 points 15 hours ago

Gillibrand must be primaried. Gillibrand's top donor to her campaign was AIPAC and she's received a lot of money from Coinbase (cryptocurrency) and Andreessen Horowitz (yes Andreessen as in Marc Andreessen the egg-head Trump donor).

Source: https://www.opensecrets.org/members-of-congress/kirsten-gillibrand/contributors?cid=N00027658&cycle=2024

[-] TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today 21 points 16 hours ago

An easier way to avoid taxes while I collect my bribes......don't mind if I do!

The rats are stealing the cargo as they abandon ship, what a bunch of enterprising rodents we have.

[-] Placebonickname@lemmy.world 5 points 15 hours ago

I was trying to sell an old MacBook on FB marketplace last week and one guy offered me meth or “800 dollars in crypto”…I couldn’t take either.

[-] TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today 11 points 13 hours ago

In that scenario it's safest to split payment, 400 in Bitcoin and 400 in meth. You gotta diversify your portfolio.

[-] Placebonickname@lemmy.world 5 points 15 hours ago

A)What is the point of bitcoin if the value is directly tied to another currency? This sounds more like a digital dollar and not a truly decentralized system.

B) if everyone creates their own stable-coins, won’t see lose value of individual satoshi or fragments of coins if there are exchange and transaction fees on both ends?

[-] untakenusername@sh.itjust.works 3 points 12 hours ago

What is the point of bitcoin if the value is directly tied to another currency?

well this stuff isn't Bitcoin, that's a separate system entirely, and the point isn't for these stablecoins to rise over time. the hope with them is that by using the dollars relative stability they can be used to conduct financial transactions that have a much more stable value than using something like Bitcoin

for example the prediction-betting site Polymarket uses a stablecoin called USDC for its transactions, instaid of some other cryptocurrency

its decentralized in a sense that it's extremely difficult to reverse transacitons and that you can keep money in a wallet without people being able to take it from you, but the value of it is set by a single company so it's isn't really decentralized

idk how to answer your second question

[-] untakenusername@sh.itjust.works 1 points 13 hours ago

I dont see how stablecoins are gunna mess with the economy

there’s actually bad stuff going on right now, and especially compared to that, this doesn’t seem like a problem at all

this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2025
245 points (100.0% liked)

politics

24190 readers
2736 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS