93
all 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] deedan06_@lemmy.dbzer0.com 38 points 6 months ago

Guess all those blocks had a reason after all.

[-] Stillwater@sh.itjust.works 29 points 6 months ago

The fediverse feed isn’t algorithmically ranked, or subject to any of Threads’ rules or moderation; it’s just a reverse-chronological feed of stuff you follow.

'Member when Facebook was like that? You know, the way people want it?

[-] irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 6 months ago

I'm surprised they're still interested in ActivityPub.

Hot Take: This is good because its easier for people to leave threads, since they can still contact their friends on threads. I do think having most instances block them is also good, so people can have a choice (I personally don't want threads).

[-] MimicJar@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago

I'm not surprised, but I agree with the hot take, so maybe it's only warm.

I think they keep interest in ActivityPub in order to keep regulators concerned with Antitrust at bay. The Fediverse isn't a real threat in Meta's view and keeping an engineer or two on it in order to stay invested is worth the cost.

Threads can say they are making an honest effort to work with the larger open source community and open federated internet. As an added bonus, it isn't actually a lie. Now the effort they're putting in is the absolute minimum, but it's there.

Now I still do think this is a positive. While most people on Threads will probably never leave, it does introduce them to the wider Fediverse. It makes the Fediverse a less scary thing.

[-] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 6 months ago
[-] fujiwood@lemmy.world 11 points 6 months ago
[-] vermaterc@lemmy.ml 6 points 6 months ago

Honestly, I thought Meta talking about Fediverse integration was just marketing bullshit. Are they really doing it? 🤔

[-] gon@lemm.ee 16 points 6 months ago
[-] kobra@lemmy.zip 5 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

How come these accusations aren’t thrown at piefed? Like it’s almost the exact same thing as lemmy just with more features like multi-community feeds, which could entice users over to piefed and leave current lemmy behind.

Or is EEE only EEE if it’s a corporation doing it?

Edit: I’m legit asking, I objectively don’t understand the difference between the two unless we’re taking motive into account? But that’s hard to prove motive either way.

[-] gon@lemm.ee 8 points 6 months ago

It's only EEE if it's an entity that could be reasonable expected to do it.

Sure, Piefed could adopt ActivityPub, extend it with proprietary capabilities, and then use that to strongly disadvantage its competitors. However, Piefed is a fully open-source project without ads or any money-making aspect at all, started by some random dude from New Zealand. Not exactly prime EEE grounds, you know?

[-] klu9@piefed.social 5 points 6 months ago

Basically, yes. EEE is a strategy developed by a dominant company whose revenue stream came from paid proprietary software and services but which embraced open standards with the goal of vanquishing the threat to their business model posed by that openness and maintaining/recovering their proprietary domination.

Does ActivityPub being open and used by many different projects & organizations pose a threat to Piefed's business model? Is Piefed a powerful company that built that power on a proprietary model and seeks to preserve that power by embracing, extending, and extinguishing ActivityPub? With the goal of maintaining/recovering proprietary domination?

No. So it ain't EEE.

[-] LukaFLBernaudeau@europe.pub 1 points 6 months ago

Yes, EEE is the software version of abusing your market dominance which may have been obtained via innovation (i.e. when Apple launched the iPhone) or enhancement of an already existing good or service (i. e. Lemmy).

[-] Ulrich@feddit.org 3 points 6 months ago

They've been doing it for quite a while. Very slowly. The problem is it's currently unidirectional, and opt-in. I imagine its the same reason Apple has adopted RCS (also opt-in): legal pressure.

If they just ignore it completely, legislators might completely fuck them like they did Apple with alternative payments. But if they kinda half-ass it then they can point to it and say "SEE, WE HAVE INTEROP! NO MONOPOLY!"

[-] irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 6 months ago

Its a bit charitable to call threads a monopoly since no one uses it.

[-] Ulrich@feddit.org 1 points 6 months ago
  1. Bit charitable to say "no one uses it" when they have >300M MAU
  2. Wasn't talking about Threads, I was talking about Meta.
[-] irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 6 months ago

I honestly doubt that, It has no relevance -- at all. I see screenshots of bluesky posts everywhere, but rarely see threads posts.

[-] Ulrich@feddit.org 1 points 6 months ago

You're giving me anecdotes and I'm giving you statistics.

[-] irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 6 months ago

I know, but the source for your statistic is Meta themselves.

[-] FenderStratocaster@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago
[-] atlien51@lemm.ee 1 points 6 months ago
[-] Bebopalouie@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 months ago

Should I feel grubby?

this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2025
93 points (100.0% liked)

Fediverse

38672 readers
355 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, Mbin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS