1008
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by cm0002@lemmy.world to c/science@lemmy.world

Edit: Changed to a non-plagerizing link

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 95 points 1 month ago

I propose that the mods should take this post down, or at least point to the original post, that cmu.fr has obviously plagiarized.

Here is what seems to be the original post: https://indiandefencereview.com/theyve-observed-teleworking-for-four-years-and-reached-one-clear-conclusion-working-from-home-makes-us-happier/

The big difference is that the original article actually points to the study: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35379616/ where as the cmu.fr plagiarized version makes no reference whatsoever to the study. Just vague slop about "scientists".

That said, I think that even the original article miscaracterizes the paper. Here is the paper abstract:

Objectives: To investigate the impacts, on mental and physical health, of a mandatory shift to working from home during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Design: Cross sectional, online survey.

Setting: Online survey was conducted from September 2020 to November 2020 in the general population.

Participants: Australian residents working from home for at least 2 days a week at some time in 2020 during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Main outcome measures: Demographics, caring responsibilities, working from home arrangements, work-related technology, work-family interface, psychosocial and physical working conditions, and reported stress and musculoskeletal pain.

Results: 924 Australians responded to the online questionnaire. Respondents were mostly women (75.5%) based in Victoria (83.7%) and employed in the education and training and healthcare sectors. Approximately 70% of respondents worked five or more days from home, with only 60% having a dedicated workstation in an uninterrupted space. Over 70% of all respondents reported experiencing musculoskeletal pain or discomfort. Gendered differences were observed; men reported higher levels of family to work conflict (3.16±1.52 to 2.94±1.59, p=0.031), and lower levels of recognition for their work (3.75±1.03 to 3.96±1.06, p=0.004), compared with women. For women, stress (2.94±0.92 to 2.66±0.88, p<0.001) and neck/shoulder pain (4.50±2.90 to 3.51±2.84, p<0.001) were higher than men and they also reported more concerns about their job security than men (3.01±1.33 to 2.78±1.40, p=0.043).

Conclusions: Preliminary evidence from the current study suggests that working from home may impact employees' physical and mental health, and that this impact is likely to be gendered. Although further analysis is required, these data provide insights into further research opportunities needed to assist employers in optimising working from home conditions and reduce the potential negative physical and mental health impacts on their employees.

Keywords: COVID-19; mental health; risk management.

So, long story short: this article is slop, copied from another piece of slop that mischaracterized a study. Overall: meh.

[-] OminousOrange@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 month ago

With that, survey data are some of the poorest quality data.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] shittydwarf@sh.itjust.works 48 points 1 month ago
[-] IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 month ago

Someone has to provide proof for the answers to obvious questions, if for no other reason than to short circuit the "SoUrCe?" clowns.

[-] entwine413@lemm.ee 9 points 1 month ago

Exactly. It's never a bad thing to have hard data on what we think is obvious.

Especially since it's not uncommon for what's 'obvious' to be wrong.

[-] Zomg@lemmy.world 37 points 1 month ago

It's also nice eating out of your own fridge, using your own toilet, and everything else.

[-] FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

Bidet, and that’s all I’ll say

[-] Zomg@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Agreed, thanks COVID(I guess?)

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] prettybunnys@piefed.social 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

from a “managing people” standpoint it’s a little easier (at least in my field) too, because it becomes obvious when someone’s product is shit if I’m paying attention

also i really like shitting at home

[-] raynethackery@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

I could tolerate going in to the office if I had my own bathroom.

[-] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 35 points 1 month ago

I both agree and disagree with the conclusions in the title....

I agree that for many people, they're happier, and likely more productive, working from home.

I would also agree that for many different people, working from an office makes them happier/more productive.

It entirely depends on the job, who you are, and the work culture. Some places are toxic and working from home to get away from it is helpful for job satisfaction. I've known people who simply focus better when they're at the office since they have a lot of distractions at home. I know for me, the opposite is true. at home, I'm in control and can limit exposure to distractions, and I can be more productive, more comfortable and overall less unhappy with my job.

IMO, this discussion is less about what companies want, whether work from home or hybrid, or in office .... The main conclusion that we should be driving home is that different people need different environments to do their best work, and be happiest with their particular job. To put it simply: workers need to be able to choose.

Until we're at the stage where employers care less about how, and where you do the work, and they care more about the work getting done.... We're going to keep going back and forth on this.

I like to work from home. That's me.

I know people who prefer to work from an office. There's plenty of people who feel they work best from the office.

There's plenty of people that need to mix between home and office work.

Bluntly: as long as you can do the work from where you're working, and how you're working, the rest should be flexible. We're (presumably) adults and professionals. If we're given work and we're being paid to do the work, then we will do the work. We don't need to be constantly supervised by middle management like toddlers.

[-] Nalivai@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

I like to work from home. That’s me.

And there is, as it turns out, a lot of people like that. Doesn't actually mean everyone is like that. But it does mean that being given this option, we, as humanity and as workers, are happier.
Your reply reminds me that "I'm not pro-life or pro-choice, I just want people to be able to chose do they want to have an abortion or not".

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] insaneinthemembrane@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

Add to this that your preference may change as your life does. Lifestage makes a big difference.

[-] Entertainmeonly 5 points 1 month ago

Tl:dr "Nah-uh, not me."

[-] WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works 33 points 1 month ago

A hard truth is that if you see an executive pushing return to office, you know one of two things about them. One of the following is true.

  1. They are terrible at finance and don't understand the sunk-cost fallacy. They have to keep using that building they bought; they've spent so much on it and simply can't bring themselves to sell it.

  2. They're a sexual molester. They're someone that uses the power of their position to coerce sex out of their employees. Fucking their employees is their primary motivation for not retiring early right now. You can't coerce your secretary to give you a blowjob over Zoom.

That's really it. They're either bad at business or they're a sexual predator. If you see an executive pushing return to office, be sure to ask them which one of these they are. Because they're definitely one or the other.

[-] unhrpetby@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 month ago
  1. Tradition.
  2. Belief that work-from-home is less efficient.
[-] WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 month ago

So

  1. They're morons and terrible at business.
[-] unhrpetby@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago
  1. Remote didn't work as well for the company.
  2. Remote didn't work as well for any number of people at that company.
[-] WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 month ago

Found the executive.

[-] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Those are both covered under 'bad at business'.

[-] mister_flibble@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago

Honestly I think your first point is just a subset of something larger and even more basic - "we've always done it this way. Change is scawwy. Different bad. Are you implying I was wrong before?" Etc.

[-] ansiz@lemmy.world 22 points 1 month ago

Just gaining back all the commute time everyday is such a huge bonus for me. Nothing at an office can compare to that alone. And I get to add in a ton of other nice bonuses from being at home.

[-] gramie@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 month ago

It may seem silly, but aside from commuting time the biggest advantage for me was being able to use my own bathroom. No bidets in the office washroom!

[-] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago

Well, it makes most of us happier. There was a minority of people who were very unhappy about remote working and who were eager for everyone to be forced back into the office. Not me, but there were some people.

[-] 6nk06@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 month ago

It was managers, especially middle-managers. And if they are not happy, no one can be happy. Too bad middle-managers are always unhappy.

[-] zeldakong64@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

I must say I am happiest with hybrid. As someone living alone I start to chew the furniture with my work happening in the same space as my leisure. I do love the flexibility, the fact that I can literally just make lunch and eat it rather than dealing with a wet lunchbox sandwich. But I do like to see other people, and an entirely remote lifestyle makes me go a little crazy

[-] spykee@lemm.ee 15 points 1 month ago

Of course it does!
When I get a complaint email I can yell at Myles to go fuck himself with a toilet brush, all whole sitting in my favourite chair and Myles will still wish me a good evening at the end of the work day.
What's not to like?

[-] TomMasz@piefed.social 14 points 1 month ago

Little do they know that worker happiness is considered the enemy of productivity.* Plus, it's harder to micromanage them when they're at home.

*By employers, not the workers, obviously.

[-] wise_pancake@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 month ago

I don't get this.

When I was unhappy at my last job I was way less productive.

Now I'm enjoying my new job and spend my time solving real technical problems and building real projects.

I was considering taking a pay cut just to leave my last job it had gotten so toxic. You can pay employees less if they're otherwise satisfied.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] selkiesidhe@lemm.ee 14 points 1 month ago

Truth. I am so happy where I'm at that I am not looking for a new job with better pay because I love WFH so much. I know here I will always WFH.

Don't need to put on makeup, don't need to put together outfits for the week, don't need to drive anywhere. I wake up thirty minutes before I clock in.

Love it!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Bebopalouie@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 month ago
[-] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Yes, but you have to consider the poor CEO's and middle managers. They need to be able to strut around an office full of people and feel important. Plus there's all that office space they leased for the next 30 years at a discount that they need to fill with workers to justify the expense!!

It cruel to only consider the happiness of the slave class while ignoring the plight of the ruling class. Don't you people know that?!?!?

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 4 points 1 month ago

During the pandemic our office was inspected and structurally condemned, so we literally have nowhere to go back to, the building is now a car park. It's great.

I wholeheartedly recommend black mould and a leaky roof to anyone that doesn't want to go back, it might be hard to arrange but it definitely works.

[-] squaresinger@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

Working from home has been the default for the last few millenia. Who would have thought that it could make people happier?

[-] mrodri89@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 month ago

Even better is if we all got a monthly allowance and not have to work full time. 😆

[-] UncleGrandPa@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

The very fact that it is something that the workers want

Is WHY Employers want to halt it.

Too many Employers believe that anything the workers want is necessarily bad for Businesses ... BECAUSE the workers want it

[-] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 month ago

Work, and society in general, isn't meant to make us happier.

[-] GladiusB@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago

It fuckin should be. We are all here for a blink of an eye on a spinning rock next to uncontrollable chaos. Let us enjoy the ride and quit squabbling over which idol is right or who has the most manufactured wealth.

[-] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 month ago

Correct. I am merely relaying my observations.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] burgerpocalyse@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

how will landlords who own all the buildings in business districts get paid, then? do you want their properties to stay empty? do you just want them to starve?

[-] Gorilladrums@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Just an FYI, most commercial real estate is owned by massive corporations because they're the only ones with enough money to build and own skyscrapers. Most mom and pop landlords are residential and they own 4 units or less. It's very rare for an average, even a wealthy average person to own more than a couple of commercial properties that they rent out. Corporate landlords are very much a big reason why WFH isn't the standard.

[-] Zaraki42@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 month ago
[-] MetalMachine@feddit.nl 5 points 1 month ago

The return to office mandate is such an annoyance. I hope companies who did it suffer because of it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] hapablap@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 1 month ago

Haha! Now if only the point of work was to make you happy! If research showed it made your boss wealthier then everyone would be WFH tomorrow!

[-] Gorilladrums@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It DOES make them wealthier. Since productivity isn't lost while employees WFH, that means that they get the same results while saving money from having costs associated with office space like rent, utilities, furnishing, and maintenance. The reason why they don't do it is because office real estate is a business worth billions and the rich are all invested in it. They're so greedy and out of touch, they'd make up any lie to demonize WFH.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 month ago

Plagiarizing. It's spelled plagiarizing.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2025
1008 points (100.0% liked)

science

20668 readers
260 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS