500
submitted 6 months ago by LWD@lemm.ee to c/firefox@lemmy.world
all 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] anyhow2503@lemmy.world 81 points 6 months ago
  1. Increase CEO pay
  2. Repeat as needed
[-] Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org 73 points 6 months ago

it should be "We need to focus on the browser" -> lays off employees and pushes feature requests to the open-sorce volunteer community to fill as they see fit.

Firefox should only exist to be a standards-compliant browser (not part of the Google ecosystem). It should not be using Google WebExtensions or a Google manifest. Anything beyond the bare minimum of compliance with the W3C's published standard should be a community made addon or plugin.

[-] kubica@fedia.io 21 points 6 months ago

Addons are important though, and they fucked with developers quite a bit in the past. Making the developers start over again is probably going to piss them further.

[-] Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org 6 points 6 months ago

Oh, I agree. We're past the point of no return now. Our only hope lies in Ladybird. I'm holding out hope for that engine, though only slightly.

[-] mogoh@lemmy.ml 16 points 6 months ago

I mean "Just focus on the browser" does not generates enough money to focus on the browser. I don't want to excuse mozilla management, but they need to try some things to generate money.

[-] koper@feddit.nl 12 points 6 months ago

Sure, but most of the projects they are criticized for (like adding the ad measurements API and AI summaries) were never going to make them money.

[-] doug@lemmy.today 8 points 6 months ago

Yeah they’re kinda trapped into playing the capitalism game/as are we all. Find me a non-profit, non-chromium, non-fork of Firefox and I’ll eat my hat…

…and I’d love to eat my hat. Won’t someone make me eat my hat??

[-] lemming741@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago
[-] grue@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago

That sort of argument would be more persuasive if it weren't for the existence all the other Free Software projects that get by just fine on grants and donations.

[-] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 3 points 6 months ago

Yeah, but then they wouldn't have the high headcount and power that they have.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

And that sort of argument would be more persuasive if (a) I didn't think Mozilla was squandering the headcount they have, and (b) if I thought Mozilla actually had more power than other comparable orgs, like the Wikimedia Foundation.

[-] Ephera@lemmy.ml 6 points 6 months ago

Firefox is one of the most complex pieces of software on the planet at around 30 million lines of code (comparable to Chrome, WebKit and the Linux kernel). Personally, I think, it's a miracle they can maintain that with less than 700 devs. That's more than 40k lines of code per dev, most of which they won't have written themselves.

At $DAYJOB, we'll write 40k lines of code maybe in two years, with a team of 5+ devs. And having to maintain 10k lines of code is what I consider rather challenging, i.e. I'll likely start falling behind sooner or later, because the world around me moves faster than I can.

[-] LwL@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Not wrong given that browsers aren't easy to maintain, but they couls start by not paying their CEO millions.

this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2025
500 points (100.0% liked)

Firefox

6397 readers
2 users here now

A community for discussion about Mozilla Firefox.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS