342
"For employers" (lemmy.world)
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 61 points 1 month ago

Employers ARE the cancer.

[-] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 39 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The employers are one solid reason for many types of cancer, from air pollution, microplastics, GRAS food additives, drugs, and any manner of modern life.

But I’d be willing to guess that’s not the “problem” that the article proposes employers are facing.

[-] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 30 points 1 month ago

The article is a bit more nuanced than the cropped screenshot suggests. The subject matter of the article is about a growing trend of cancer diagnosis im younger employees. It is treated as concerning. The subject came about due to an analysis of the increasing health insurance costs incurred by employers because cancer in young people is a new phenomenon. It also touches on the possible long term impacts on young people who have had to undergo cancer treatment.

https://www.axios.com/2024/08/21/cancer-rates-employer-insurance-health-costs

[-] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 28 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Yeah, no. Does cancer affect company's insurance costs, sure. But making the rise in cancer rates in younger people, a public health crisis experienced by individuals and families, into an aggregate bottom line issue for capitalists is dehumanizing. Throwing an aside comment about "the possible long term impacts on young people who have had to undergo cancer treatment," just makes it all the worse because they are acknowledging the human aspect is a concern, but they are still most concerned about the dollars and cents for businesses' insurance premiums. That part should be the footnote, not the headline.

[-] BlueMagma@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 month ago

That guy got out of the cave and read the article, now he's come back to tell us how the headline shadow of the article was a misrepresentation.

Quick everyone, let's all beat him to death with our downvote, because he tells us the article does not align with what we believe, he must be trying to divide us, but we know our tribe is the most important thing, let's defend the tribe at all cost...

/s

[-] QuoVadisHomines@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago

Sounds like the solution is socialized medicine

[-] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 month ago

That is exactly the take I got from the article. They even listed a lack of.preventative care and screening as a contributor to the rise in cancer rates in young people. If I were to guess, the cancer is being found because the employee finally has health insurance and could get themselves checked out without the threat of financial ruin.

[-] QuoVadisHomines@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 month ago

If this is about American businesses, perhaps we could try a health care system that does not require the employer to cover medical costs but instead try a collective national solution.

[-] CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

Tina might want to get her ears checked. She seems a bit tone deaf.

[-] bisby@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

Axios's target demo is the employers, not the affected young people.

This is an article about "if you don't care about other people, stop and think about how it affects your bottom line." It's meant to be a way to attempt to instill some pseudo-empathy into the sociopath business types.

When you are trying to talk sense to dense people, sometimes you have to say things that don't tone well with reality in order to reach them.

[-] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Tina Read, Tina no listen

[-] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 month ago

c/aboringdystopia

[-] FelixCress@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Well, it is damaging their assets. Next thing to happen is some multinational companies to sue employees for getting cancer.

this post was submitted on 10 Jun 2025
342 points (100.0% liked)

Facepalm

3327 readers
174 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS