122
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] misk@sopuli.xyz 54 points 1 week ago

This is to make Game Pass appear more valuable, nothing more.

[-] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 week ago

Then I won't touch either. I am not giving Microsoft money.

[-] misk@sopuli.xyz 12 points 1 week ago
[-] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 week ago

I didn't buy that either

[-] 13igTyme@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

I'll never understand why people just can't NOT buy a game they know is shit.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] RedSnt@feddit.dk 51 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Oof. I love Obsidian, I really do, but The Outer Worlds 1 wasn't at all the kind of game I was looking for. NPC's felt very cardboard-y, each and everyone you had to talk to was anchored to one place, the world didn't feel lived in or alive.

And then asking $80 for a sequel to that?
That's gonna be a no from me dawg.

[-] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 19 points 1 week ago

It was also short. For 80 dollars I would expect 120 hours in game like RDR2. That's the bar. If it's not that long, I think I finished the first one in 25, then I'll happily wait until it's lower

[-] BaroqueInMind@lemmy.one 9 points 1 week ago

RDR2 is such a slow-burn masterpiece that I'm still enjoying that game years after it released. The game is longer than 120 hours given how it implies you take your time and enjoy the views, the immersion and the story.

RDR2 was deliberately designed to be a high inertia experience that takes its sweet-ass time to start off and difficult to slow down when its going.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Goodeye8@piefed.social 8 points 1 week ago

Same. I was willing to keep Outer Worlds 2 on my radar because I love Obsidian and they've earned my attention even though I didn't particularly enjoy Outer Worlds 1, but at that price point the game has dropped off my radar. Unless it's getting New Vegas level praise post launch I probably won't be paying any more attention to this game.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Krauerking@lemy.lol 7 points 1 week ago

That and the completely garbage inventory with no good filter and sort.

That first game felt like a demo with lot of polish but didn't feel like a precursor for an $80 game. And already cost me $30 for the first time of meh.

[-] Mac@mander.xyz 17 points 1 week ago

$80 is twice the annual mountain biking pass at my local state park.

Not a chance.

[-] MetalMachine@feddit.nl 17 points 1 week ago

Time to join patient gamers who wait for a sale

[-] forgotaboutlaye@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

You can probably wait for this one to be free, or at least bundled.

[-] Jumi@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago

Don't worry everyone, it'll proabably be on gamepass on release. You should all get that /s

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Doomsider@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago

People are struggling to buy groceries.

CEO: Let's raise the price of a good people don't need because money.

I can only hope this move backfires spectacularly.

[-] p03locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 week ago

It's The Outer Worlds. It will.

The first game was shit. The game it was confused with became the greatest game ever made. Go buy that one instead.

[-] LordGimp@lemm.ee 3 points 1 week ago

No man's sky is not anywhere near the greatest game ever made. Id honestly take outer wilds over either game being discussed. Outer wilds has a charm that's impossible for a AAA studio to match, and it's a solid gravity sandbox besides that.

The NMS game loop is just trying to make number go up as efficiently as possible for nanites and credits. It's not fun. It is and always has been a grind.

[-] overload@sopuli.xyz 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

This was peak satire given you genuinely thought that they were talking about NMS and then proceeded to talk about Outer Wilds, the true game that OP was referencing, by accident.

[-] jacksilver@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

I'm pretty sure they meant Outer Wilds, which is one of my top games of all time.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 14 points 1 week ago

That's funny, it's my first confirmed "wait until it's on sale" game

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 week ago

I don't mean to sound mean or dismissive, but... I feel like I'm the only one who played the first Outer Worlds. It just feels like it's one of those things that was supposed to be a thing, but wasn't a thing.

Don't get it twisted, I'm not complaining that they're making a sequel. I'm relieved and hope it does better, I just remember more people complaining about Outer Worlds than talking about it. So I'm hoping this second chance for the franchise really helps it get off the ground (Unless it was a big hit and I'm just badly misinformed about how well it did)

But that 80 dollar price tag? Lemme tell you that's not a consumer friendly choice, that's Spacer's Choice.

[-] SkyeStarfall 8 points 1 week ago

Outer worlds just felt so uninteresting to me. I played it, and it was a forgettable experience imo

[-] clarinet_estimator@lemm.ee 5 points 1 week ago

Parvati was the only light in the darkness for me. I love her and her quest line, and hope there's more good ace rep like her in other media.

I stopped playing the game as soon as I finished her quest line because I was bored with everything else =\

[-] lohky@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

I played it in the hospital waiting for my wife to go into labor haha. I'm pretty sure that's the only reason I remember it. I tried to replay it recently and made it about halfway through before moving on.

I ain't paying $80 for it and there's no game pass on Linux. Guess I'm waiting for a sale. 🤷

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] C1pher@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

Yea, no thanks dawg. First game was boring AF, and on top of that, now you want 80 bucks?

[-] Lightor@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

Ya'll remember when pirating was massive.

Yeah let's do that again.

[-] 11111one11111@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Wanna know how i know inflation, cost of living increases, supply chain bottle necks and price increases are all a bunch of fuckin bullshit? Im still paying the same price for an 8th or Oz of weed as I was paying 15-20 years ago in highschool. The last samurai of the lost world of privately owned businesses before corpo whores ruined the world is you friendly neighborhood drug dealers. Lol

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago
[-] Nexz@feddit.nl 4 points 1 week ago
[-] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Even if it were available on Linux, GamePass isn’t the value it once was.

[-] Nexz@feddit.nl 3 points 1 week ago

It’s indeed worse. I cancelled at least half a year ago. Standard practice these days, lure consumers with great value for money and then make it worse by the day - line goes up!

[-] Doom@ttrpg.network 7 points 1 week ago

I'll wait a year or two.

[-] Lumbardo@reddthat.com 7 points 1 week ago

I am officially done buying games on release. None of these games are worth 80 bucks.

[-] slaneesh_is_right@lemmy.org 5 points 1 week ago

Do you wanna spend 80 dollars on a new game, or wait a year and buy it for 10 dollars when it works and is actually finished?

WHERE CAN I PRE ORDER IT FOR 120 DOLLARS TO PLAY IT 3 DAYS EARLY AND PAY TO BE A PLAYTESTER?

Like i'm not surprised why games are this expensive.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] clarinet_estimator@lemm.ee 7 points 1 week ago

No thanks. The first was not good enough to warrant buying the second at $60, let alone $80.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Sauciness6413@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Nah. I’m good.

[-] rayquetzalcoatl@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Was there a big contingent of people waiting for a sequel? I recall the original game being massively hyped and actually being pretty disappointing once I played it.

[-] overload@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 week ago

Best of luck with that. I got the first game for free and still haven't played it. I say that as a fan of obsidian/old Bethesda i.e. the person you should be trying to get buy your game.

[-] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago

It's kinda mid, id suggest Tainted Grail if ya want a Bethesda like game. Doesn't quite scratch the itch but it's close enough.

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Better than Starfield as a sci-fi RPG. Had some pretty boring balance choices imo. Dialogue was decent but I didn't really love anything.

Yeah, I don't like it, but mid is fair... And I'll buy #2 anyways if the reviews hold up.

People are free to complain about the price point but it's pretty absurd to think gaming is somehow immune to inflation.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Nibodhika@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

You should definitely play it, it's a cool game.

[-] overload@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 week ago

I was probably a bit uncharitable. TBF it is on my backlog of games I intend to play. It's just not a game I would want to pay $80 USD for based on what I've seen review wise.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] FuckFascism@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Guess I'm waiting another two years after launch for this one too.

[-] Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 week ago

Two years after The Outer Worlds: “oh mods will make it better, I got it for free”

They didn’t.

I respect the same for the second game. But also free. And wasting SSD space.

[-] hzl 3 points 1 week ago

It literally took 30 years for the most expensive games to go up by $10.

[-] shani66@ani.social 3 points 1 week ago

Audacious, if nothing else.

[-] burgerpocalyse@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

even if wages increased with inflation and 80 dollar games weren't so distressing, the first outer wilds fucking sucked and I have no hope for the sequel

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2025
122 points (100.0% liked)

Games

19804 readers
361 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS