27
top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

It's surprising this was faster and cheaper than simply building a small block of single level apartments (eg. Duplex style).

The effort to build those block/brick foundations...

Thanks for the link!

[-] zabadoh@ani.social 2 points 4 days ago

Think about what things would have been like after the earthquake: Any building materials and labor would have been in extremely high demand.

The faster that one could put up anything to house people, the better, even using "waste materials" like old streetcars.

At least these had a solid roof and walls.

No doubt there was even more temporary housing that would resemble homeless huts that we see today.

Sadly, according to the article, these didn't stay for very long, and were replaced by more traditional construction after 4 years.

[-] princessnorah 3 points 3 days ago

I mean, I'm more surprised they bothered with the foundation at all really. It's not like they couldn't have slapped it on the ground with some wheel chocks and called it a day. In fact, I know of people in the 21st century doing that with old W-class trams here in Victoria.

this post was submitted on 05 Jun 2025
27 points (100.0% liked)

Trams, Trolleys and Streetcars

1489 readers
3 users here now

A Community for the interessting world of Trams, Trolleys and Streetcars!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS