449
Fuck French Imperialism Rule (lemmy.tf)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by BartsBigBugBag@lemmy.tf to c/196
48 comments fedilink hide all child comments

That means fuck ECOWAS as a tool of the oppressors also. Critical support for ~~every~~ most coup(s) in Africa, and for the rights of Africans to demand the French and US militaries leave their country.

Critical Readings:

  • Neocolonialism by Kwame Nkrumah.
  • How Europe Underdeveloped Africa by Walter Rodney.
  • Rethinking Ownership of Development in Africa by T.D. Harper-Shipman.

Recommended readings:

  • Unsustainable Empire: Alternative Histories of Hawaii Statehood by Dean Itsugi Saranillio.
  • Radical Markets: Uprooting Capitalism and Democracy for a Just Society by Eric A. Posner and E. Glen Weyl.
all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de 93 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Critical support for every coup in Africa

Hurr durr Western imperialism bad Russian imperialism good

Why don't we get France (a democracy) to pressure their leaders to set up free and fair elections then get the fuck out after they're done (simplifying things here as it's a slow process to not create a power vacuum) rather than supporting a like-for-like swap of France for Russia or Chinese control of the country through debt?

I'm not against the premise of the post, just the caption which reads like mindless Russophilia

[-] Hegar@kbin.social 19 points 1 year ago

Your comment about Chinese debt is uninformed - China holds a small percentage of total African debt and there's only 1 country (Zambia, iirc) where Chinese debt is even close to half of the debt.

Eurobond debt is far greater in almost every debt distressed African nation and is the debt that African leaders and bankers commonly cite as the problem.

The Chinese debt-trap story keeps being repeated by the US state department, but it does not reflect in any way the reality of African debt.

https://chinaglobalsouth.com/2023/07/13/graph-of-the-day-chinas-real-share-of-african-debt/

[-] match@pawb.social 27 points 1 year ago

This article from the same source suggests China is at 54% of Zambia's debt, which is massive for a single country based off the other graphs: https://chinaglobalsouth.com/2023/05/31/how-zambias-debt-mix-is-forecast-to-evolve/

[-] Hegar@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yep! Zambia is the only country where the numbers don't immediately disprove the debt trap narrative.

Contrasting Zambia's numbers with the percentage of China's total African debt percentage only highlights how low it is in other African countries.

[-] BartsBigBugBag@lemmy.tf 13 points 1 year ago

Nice strawman you’ve constructed there. Be a shame if someone set it on fire…

[-] 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de 53 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Oh no, are you having hallucinations? Because last I checked the majority of coups in former French Africa were Russia/Wagner backed so there's no strawman in sight.

[-] BartsBigBugBag@lemmy.tf 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You’re advocating for FRANCE to DICTATE TO AFRICAN COUNTRIES HOW THEY CAN BE SOVERIEGN. Do you not see the irony in that statement? When has France ever set up “Free and Fair Elections” in ANY of their vassal states or neo-colonies? Was it a free and fair election when they murdered democratically elected revolutionaries? Was it fair when they dictated the currency and exchange rate for all of their vassals? Who do the people support? Have you even looked? It’s not France lmao.

[-] Darorad@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago

Maybe the coup should hold elections and invite international watchers. The colonial power being bad does not mean any action the subjects take is inherently justified. Each action needs to be morally weighed individually.

[-] BartsBigBugBag@lemmy.tf 2 points 1 year ago

I could see that, however, what we’ve seen in the past in similar instances, is that the West will dictate who the eligible parties for the elections are, as they (the French and US, among others) did in Vietnam, among other places and times. So I also see why the revolutionary government would be wary of such an event. Especially given the only interactions the west has had with them so far has been to tell them to surrender power by X date or risk military action against them. It doesn’t seem that there’s any particular desire or effort towards anything other than immediate return of the compromised presidency, which clearly isn’t going to happen.

[-] 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de 14 points 1 year ago

Nice strawman.

I'm saying that the French people make it be known (as they're so good at making things known to the government - probably the best in the world) that they don't want their government to continue abusing their former colonies, then hopefully that gets pushed up the agenda for prospective parties, who then go on to organise a transition to full self rule. If that had happened before we wouldn't be having this discussion, so not only are you constructing a strawman by using the acts of former French governments against a hypothetical future one, you're not even destructing it properly as you're just saying "look this happened before" rather than actually giving reasons as to why your hypothetical future French strawman government would go against the will of their voters to maintain control over their former colonies.

[-] BartsBigBugBag@lemmy.tf 7 points 1 year ago

So again, you don’t support Africans taking their sovereignty, but you do support French citizens asking their government to give African countries sovereignty.

Why would the French government vote against the will of their constituency? I don’t know, maybe you should ask them why they forced through that retirement bill earlier this year.

This all neglects the fact, that it is not the French governments NOR the French peoples right to determine African sovereignty, it is Africans right and theirs alone. I have a feeling you would’ve supported the French over Sankara just because he gained power in a coup.

[-] mounderfod@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 1 year ago

So again, you don’t support Africans taking their sovereignty, but you do support French citizens asking their government to give African countries sovereignty.

both have the same result, and if the former is the only option then fine, but the latter certainly results in less death and suffering than a violent coup might

[-] BartsBigBugBag@lemmy.tf 9 points 1 year ago

Well, they’ve had 50 years to surrender their neo-colonies, you can’t fault Africans for getting tired of waiting and seizing their sovereignty themselves. Or you can, but you’d be an idiot.

[-] Ignacio@kbin.social 76 points 1 year ago

Critical support for every coup in Africa, and for the rights of Africans to demand the French and US militaries leave their country.

No critical support for the rights of Africans to demand the Russian and Wagner militaries leave their country? Because you're replacing one colonialism with another colonialism. Should I point out that Wagner is paid with African natural resources like diamonds? What is the difference between the exploitation from France and the exploitation from Russia?

[-] BartsBigBugBag@lemmy.tf 6 points 1 year ago

I’ve yet to see any evidence of Wagner interference in these coups, and in fact, the countries they’ve been taking place in most recently have been countries with heavy western military presence, not Wagner. Not to mention, the suggestion that Africans are not capable of performing a coup themselves to me smells of paternalism, but that may not be your implication and I’m sorry if I misinterpreted it.

[-] Ignacio@kbin.social 24 points 1 year ago

I'm not talking about them performing a coup. Although I don't like coups, they're property of nobody but themselves, and eventually democracy will return.

But French troops doing bad stuff, or doing neither bad nor good stuff (that's doing nothing at all), that doesn't mean they should be replaced by another foreign nation troops, being either private or not. If we agree that African nations are sovereign enough to decide their own future, they're also sovereign enough to defend themselves, or to ask for help to neighbouring countries in exchange of nothing. But in the countries we're talking about, they asked for help to another potential colonial nation in exchange of natural resources, that could be manufactured in place, thus creating employment, wealth and other benefits.

[-] BartsBigBugBag@lemmy.tf 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That’s a perspective I can understand. I was pretty disappointed to see Wagner given a mine in Burkina Faso, for sure.

I think, though, that unfortunately, it is an inevitable consequence of western reaction to the coups and their history of suppressing African sovereignty.

Fighting off jihadis(which is what Wagner is being contracted to do in Burkina Faso) is a global problem, and can’t be tackled by any one nation, especially not a poor, landlocked one like Burkina Faso. However, the wests actions in fighting Islamic extremism in Africa has been so heavily fraught with abuse of Africans among other issues that I don’t think we’ll ever see the return of trust between West Africa and the West, and so, when paired with the global Wests refusal to work with the coup governments, and tendency to issue sanctions which even further damage civilian populations while leaving governmental structures nearly untouched (and not to mention that sanctions have been proven to increase support for a regime in the majority of cases), the newly free African nations have no choice but to look to alternative economic blocs for support, and in our current world, that alternative block is essentially just Russia.

[-] yetAnotherUser@feddit.de 11 points 1 year ago

https://archive.ph/0xLUh

Not a successful coup but rather the planning of a coup. About the recent coups, there's somewhat of a lack of information. Time will tell whether Wagner was influencing the coups. What is obvious is Wagner is certainly supported by a large portion of the population, seeing as there's Wagner flags everywhere.

Then there's also Russia + Wagner attempting to gain control over Moldova

[-] suny 38 points 1 year ago

what is tankie propaganda doing on my tankie-free community, go away to lemmygrad with this shit

[-] BartsBigBugBag@lemmy.tf 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Supporting popular uprisings against neocolonial compradore regimes is tankie propaganda now? I’ll be sure to tell my entire Food Not Bombs group they’re all tankies, and that we can no longer practice anarchism anymore because some guy on lemmy says we’re tankies because we support the right of the African people to self-determine.

What praxis groups are you a member of that support the ousted government despite the popular support for the coups? I’d be interested in knowing, so I can be sure to never give material support to such a reactionary organization.

Edit: Also, two comments in three months, only one of which (this one) in 196. For being your community, you sure contribute a lot less than I and many others do.

[-] suny 11 points 1 year ago

you sound like you're in dire need of a shower and a grass touching session

as per your edit, i'm shy and also have better things to do than having twitter level discourse with annoying anarchists that whine about western imperialism while suspiciously getting defensive about russian influence in recent military coups (not popular uprisings) :^)

[-] BartsBigBugBag@lemmy.tf 2 points 1 year ago

I definitely could use a shower, I woke up late today, but I touch grass every day on my way to feed the chickens before I go to work for the day, thanks for your concern. Usually I’m wearing shoes, but I’ve been trying to toughen the soles of my feet recently, so I go barefoot basically anytime I’m at home.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] omni_memer 20 points 1 year ago

Tankie is when you oppose french neocolonialism

[-] cnnrduncan@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago

Acknowledging the bad things that Western nations have done doesn't mean that you think it's alright for Russia/China to do the same bad things

[-] suny 2 points 1 year ago

oh of course, that I agree with. the point of my shitpostey comment though was that this post suspiciously ignores wagner/ccp influence in sub-saharan africa and kind of implies that the recent military coups had anything to do with civil resistance.

[-] sbv@sh.itjust.works 35 points 1 year ago

I'm trying to track down a list of the leaders.

As far as I can tell this goes back to a Reddit post that has been removed. The top-voted comment goes through a list and says why those leaders weren't assassinated by France.

Anyone have a list?

[-] Zoboomafoo@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago

Bold claim, mind backing it up with a source?

[-] boredtortoise@lemm.ee 21 points 1 year ago

Support for coups from the people. Not every coup

[-] CephalonKappa@discuss.tchncs.de 17 points 1 year ago

You belong on hexbear lol

[-] cacheson@kbin.social 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

C'mon now. You may find BartsBigBugBag annoying, and "critical support" is kind of sus, but they're not anywhere near hexbear's level:

  • There's been no assertions here that anyone should end up "against the wall".
  • From what I've seen BBBB tends to argue mostly alone against a larger audience. Hexbears intentionally show up en masse to overwhelm their opposition.
  • BBBB's arguments appear to be genuine. At the very least, they're not flooding the thread with annoying image macros and pictures of pig shit.
[-] BartsBigBugBag@lemmy.tf 11 points 1 year ago

I’ve been here (3 days) longer than you lol.

[-] mustardman@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yes but tankies go on Hexbear. It's the Lemmy Law.

[-] TotallynotJessica@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Colonialism bad, but this post sets off too many red flags. Critical support to all coups? Critical support too often means silencing of valid criticisms. I've only ever seen people using that term unironically if they believe things like democratic centralism are a good idea. Some coups make things better, some make thingd worse. Some could even allow reactionaries to gain power or result in neocolonialists gaining more control.

Also, that Radical Markets book is fishy. Posner seems like a sleazy neoliberal and while Weyl has a point with quadratic voting, I don't want that applied to the government. I think that we should redistribute excess capital held by private individuals to the people evenly so that no single individuals can wield power without having it given willingly.

Edit: grammar

Edit 2: God I'm tired.

[-] celeste 11 points 1 year ago

Source? For fact checking reasons and stuff

[-] LaChaleurDeLaNuit@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Why would you want to check that? Just trust me bro.

[-] Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Wow! I never learned about this!

France and the US... Murdering our neighbors... Destabilizing foreign countries... All learning from the lessons from the UK.

[-] Femcowboy@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

For those asking for lists/sources, I did a quick duckduckgo search and here is the first thing I got. Just taking a quick glance and seeing Gaddafi on the list leads me to believe the claim is at least slightly dubious. Yeah, sure, France was involved in that revolution, but his death at the hands of his own countrymen was immortalized in a snuff film you don't wanna watch.

https://www.africanexponent.com/post/10487-france-has-always-carried-evil-imperialism-with-it

[-] LaChaleurDeLaNuit@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

People need to have a bad guy to point their finger at. And trust me, as a French-Israeli citizen I know what I'm talking about 😬 Folks will give a lot of moral and life lessons before sweeping their front door first, as we say in french.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] deft@ttrpg.network 7 points 1 year ago

top tier post

[-] Franzia 6 points 1 year ago

Thank you for the reading recommendations!

[-] iforgotmyinstance@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Enjoying unprecedented stretches of world peace while simultaneously denigrating the nations which enforce it.

Imagine being so privileged.

[-] BartsBigBugBag@lemmy.tf 13 points 1 year ago

When has there been world peace? Or do people in places like Yemen just not count as people to you?

this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2023
449 points (100.0% liked)

196

16538 readers
2016 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
moss
greembow
moss@lemmy.world
queue@beehaw.org
funky_rodent
PeachyMcPeachface
threegnomes
greembow@lemmy.world
remotelove@lemmy.ca
Roflmasterbigpimp@feddit.de
qaz@lemmy.world
A_Very_Big_Fan@lemm.ee
qaz
qaz@lemmy.ca
A_Very_Big_Fan@lemmy.world
qaz@lemmy.dbzer0.com
Qaz@lemmy.ml
qaz@sh.itjust.works
qaz@lemmy.sdf.org