20
Rulescraper (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by boo_ to c/196
all 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] emi@decept.org 3 points 2 years ago

@boo_ @196 im not excited for this, one of the proposed locations is like 10m away from my house

[-] outer_spec@lemmy.studio 2 points 2 years ago

ok but if they were building a building called the sexscraper 10m away from my house I’d be down if only because of the cool name

[-] boo_ 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Honestly, I get it. It's easy to call people out as NIMBYs who are against stuff like this, but while I think that this could grant safety to sex workers, I'm not sure I would want it next to my house either

[-] emi@decept.org 3 points 2 years ago

@boo_ I honestly don't mind the concept itself, either. But do I trust them to implement it in a way that would actually meaningfully improve things? Not really. I see it as a force of gentrification more so than anything. They want to "clean up" the center, after all. I don't think it can get more clear than that :s_confused:

this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2023
20 points (100.0% liked)

196

18480 readers
84 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.


Rule: You must post before you leave.



Other rules

Behavior rules:

Posting rules:

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196's:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS