459
Google's WebP (lemmy.ml)
submitted 1 week ago by Richat@lemmy.ml to c/memes@lemmy.ml
all 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

JXL! JXL! JXL!

[-] jmarya@cyberia.hydrar.de 1 points 6 days ago

I have no problem with that on a good operating system (Linux), I even save some of my images as AVIF and it's good.

[-] Xatolos@reddthat.com 56 points 1 week ago

Oddly, reminds me of when Apple first pushed/forced HEIC on all of it's users, without letting them know of course. Because of that, it caused thousands of students to fail their AP exams.

[-] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 20 points 1 week ago

Big problem with HEIC is it requires H265 licensing because it's effectively a single frame of video. This is why Windows won't open HEIC by default is Microsoft didn't want to pay for the licensing

[-] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 4 points 1 week ago

My Samsung phone pushes out HEIF photos by default

[-] Hirom@beehaw.org 17 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It's sad.

Adoption rate does matter. HEIC currently has a 13.99% adoption, and WebP has a 95.92% adoption rate in web browsers.

So when considering support in softwate, it's more reasonable to pick WebP as default, rather than HEIC.

There are of course other considerations, like compression efficiency, format features, patents, ...

[-] Richat@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 week ago

My Samsung was recording videos in Hevc by default the other day and it was a pain to edit them in Da Vinci Resolve. Luckily Kdenlive handled them without any problems

[-] HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Apple just loves having their own media formats

[-] Sarcasmo220@lemmy.ml 18 points 1 week ago

The irony is if I download this meme, it will be in webp format 😐

[-] user224@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 1 week ago

Only from the Lemmy image view, but the original is JPEG and you can download it too.

[-] Sarcasmo220@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago

Today I learned something. Thanks!

[-] drkt@scribe.disroot.org 18 points 1 week ago
[-] smee@poeng.link 4 points 1 week ago

Whenever I hear someone mention JPEG XL allI think of is JPEG 2000.

[-] Kichae@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 week ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

JXL is my favourite squadron.

[-] 2xsaiko@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 1 week ago

Decoder skill issue. If ImageMagick or whatever other open-source software can read it, everyone else has no excuse.

(That said, if I could pick, I'd pick JPEG XL)

[-] Goretantath@lemm.ee 11 points 1 week ago

Its funny since i can just rename it to a jpeg alot of the time and it loads on irfanview.

[-] AtariDump@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago
[-] obinice@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

I've got her book by my bed, such a good read :-)

[-] AtariDump@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago
[-] Heavybell@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

We used to be like this about PNGs once, it'll pass.

[-] HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Some sites still don't support PNG lol. Usually it's places where they specifically expect a photo, where they'll hard code the validation to only check if it's a JPEG. I once had to upload a picture of my face for something and the original JPEG was too large, so I took a screenshot and tried uploading that but it wouldn't work because it only accepted JPEGs. So I had to figure out how to compress the image locally on my phone because I didn't want to upload a picture of me to one of those online converters.

[-] Heavybell@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Yeah that's true. I'm mostly talking local tools right now, but low tier sites are always gonna be a problem.

[-] konalt@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

The only program I've seen that explicitly doesn't support PNG is old Source games with custom spray images.

[-] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Even lemmy.world is in this bucket (not sure about other instances). See: https://lemmy.world/post/28304534

[-] gianni@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 week ago

Hilariously, WebP often isn’t better than JPEG for compression efficiency

[-] qaz@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago
[-] Biyoo 4 points 1 week ago

Every time I try to use webp the file is bigger than in jpg, why do people try to push it for the web ? Is it maybe faster to render for browsers ?

[-] vithigar@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago

What compression settings are you using for each? If you're just accepting defaults it's quite possible you're comparing against a lossless webp, which is quite likely to be larger than jpeg at typical quality settings.

[-] Biyoo 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 42 minutes ago)

I just did a test with the first png I found and it looks like the default were lossless, hence why compression ratio were bad. Here the webp in smaller than the jpeg and noticeably better. Maybe it would be different for different kinds of picture, with colours, more details and stuff, but here it is clear.

For now I stand corrected, webp is better.

[-] Biyoo 2 points 1 week ago

It may not be easy to see because the screenshot isn't perfect, and lemmy compress it further, but the jpg clearly has some artifacts while the webp is slightly blurry.

[-] Irelephant@lemm.ee 3 points 1 week ago

JPG is lossy, WEBP is smaller than PNG, but is lossless. I think.

this post was submitted on 21 May 2025
459 points (100.0% liked)

Memes

50486 readers
468 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS