598

It's like they can't help being assholes.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] BlackSheep@lemmy.ca 19 points 20 hours ago

I know this comment will sound really naive, and it’s not going to make a difference in the grand scheme of things. But, I’m seriously depressed and sad. I was part of the age of Aquarius, and I really did think we were going to make a difference. We tried, but nothing has changed. I just wish we could live in a world of “live and let live”. No violence, no wars, no annexations, no fascists. Kind of like Norway...

[-] ABC123itsEASY@lemmy.world 4 points 18 hours ago

Take care of yourself. None of this is normal and thus you're going to need more self care than normal. You are making a difference even just sharing the way this makes you feel. We're all in this together and I can see you know that too.

[-] BlackSheep@lemmy.ca 2 points 18 hours ago

Actually, I really don’t care about your religion or politics. I DO care that children are dying. I DO care that children are suffering and going hungry.

[-] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 3 points 18 hours ago
[-] ABC123itsEASY@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago

It happens. Not a big deal and frankly those are important things that we should all care about so I can't say I disagree.

[-] Witchfire@lemmy.world 3 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

I feel exactly the same way as you. I didn't have any plans to leave my country up until a year or two ago. While I'm glad I did leave, I'm also so extremely angry and upset at the failure of a country that caused me to leave. It also makes me sick to my stomach to think about what's going to happen to the people I love

[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago

Have you ever seen a chicken hatch? It's a messy and destructive process. Before that first peck, the chick inside the egg is all but invulnerable. As soon as it makes that first crack though, all bets are off. The shell can cut the chick killing it, it can drown in the remaining embryonic fluid in the egg if it can't get out in time, and it is immediately set upon by hordes of bacteria and viruses that couldn't get to it. However, as long as everything goes somewhat normally, 5 minutes late you have a cute fluffy chick.

Humanity takes a bit longer to develop societally because so many bad habits have inertia. Your generation kept the ball rolling, and specifically set up the necessary destruction needed to get society to the point that you were at 55 years ago. The process started in the mid 1800s, and should finish, in the next couple to few decades, with either all of us dead, or whoever's left uniting under a single banner of equality and prosperity for all.

[-] BlackSheep@lemmy.ca 2 points 17 hours ago

History. It’s a messy and destructive process. Let me dilute this: Unfortunately, we haven’t learned from WWI, or WWII. Our grandfathers fought and died against fascism, and Hitler. And here we are—again. AGAIN. There are children starving, dying, and suffering in Gaza. We have lost our humanity.

[-] WizardofFrobozz@lemmy.ca 9 points 18 hours ago

You know what isn't protected in the US? Political affiliation.

Start denying MAGA trash employment and service.

[-] Bravo@eviltoast.org 11 points 21 hours ago

Page 21 of the ruling:

First, the Enforcement Guidance contravenes Title VII's plain text by expanding the scope of "sex" beyond the biological binary: male and female. Although Title VII defines "sex" to also include "pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions," §2000e(k), the Enforcement Guidance concludes that "sex" under Title VII "includes 'pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions' and sexual orientation and gender identity." Enforcement Guidance, §I(A)(5) (emphasis added). Notably, the Guidance uses quotation marks around "pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions"—but not "sexual orientation" or "gender identity." Because neither the plain text of Title VII nor Supreme Court precedent defines Title VII "sex" this broadly. Thus, the Enforcement Guidance lacks statutory or jurisprudential authority to expand Title VII's definition of "sex" to include these new categories.

Interestingly, this also seems to provide a legal basis to discriminate against straight people and cis people. It'll be interesting to see how Republicans attempt to close that extra loophole without also closing the loophole for discrimination against LGBTQ people.

[-] untakenusername@sh.itjust.works 5 points 18 hours ago

average Texas moment

[-] ssfckdt 3 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

Sadly, there isn't a law against it.

Edit: But I'm sure it's one of the very important things that the Democratic Party is totally gonna do someday like they always do whenever they have a majority in congress and/or presidency. Just you wait

[-] Rustic_Fry@literature.cafe 3 points 18 hours ago

This man's such a piece of shit even Tyndale didn't want to stick around.

[-] raynethackery@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

Time to break out the combat boots.

[-] adhdplantdev@lemm.ee 4 points 1 day ago

Relax. Its not great but this is one of those judges the government always puts there shit in front of. We should do work to get him removed but this will hopefully be brought down in the courts which so far haven't been totally useless

[-] InputZero@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

It's amazing how just a few months ago the people's option on the courts was at an all-time low. Now because President Trump has caused so much chaos they're more popular than ever.

[-] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 3 points 18 hours ago

It's the difference between getting stabbed and getting your arm degloved. Sure getting stabbed sucks but getting your arm degloved is far far worse.

Texas can't secede fast enough, maybe we can get a twofer with florida

[-] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago

How long until straight men will be fired, or at least yelled at, for supposedly being gay for not risking their lives at work?

[-] BleatingZombie@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

My work photo is my brother-in-law and I posing in tuxes at his and my sister's wedding

Objectively, I look super gay in the photo

I haven't changed it because I'm waiting for the homophobe to yell at the straight guy for his gay-looking photo

[-] Alaik@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago

Oh I'm sure it'll be soon. That's an excellent cover to essentially abuse workers.

[-] Catma@lemmy.world 151 points 2 days ago

Federal Judge in Texas? Dont even need to open the article to know that has to be that fucker in Amarillo.

Damn it I hate this timeline

[-] dhork@lemmy.world 114 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Yup. For those who are not aware, they structured that district specifically so that all lawsuits filed in certain zip codes in Amarillo go to this guy. So any time they need a convenient MAGA cout ruling, they find someone in Amarillo to file the lawsuit over it.

[-] skulblaka@sh.itjust.works 25 points 2 days ago

Hmm... Sounds blatantly illegal.

Put it on the pile, I guess.

[-] andros_rex@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

When I was in high school, in government class we had an assignment where we had to draw different districts for Texas - that depending on how you divided it, you could make either party win.

It’s disgusting. It’s ultimately about denying African Americans representation.

It was a key component of the southern strategy that the Republican Party focused on. Basically, you don’t need to pack every court. Just structure one area in a way that one or two ultra-con judges can rule on everything.

[-] Kbobabob@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago

So any time they need a convenient MAGA cout ruling,

I read this as MAGA cunt ruling

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] lemmylump@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

I had the unpleasant experience of having to stay a night in Amarillo on a road trip. I went to a bar close to my hotel, and every single person including the fucking bartender was smoking.

It was disgusting, I got a large round of drinks for my group and we went to the patio where nobody was and away from the smoke, we did roshambo to determine who had to go back into the cancer room to get more drinks.

I had to go in twice and each time this man was over explaining pool to some woman, over what was probably 30 to 40 minutes I don't think she ever took a shot, and that dude was still talking out his ass.

Also, just like in the movies some guy comes out and walks up to us and says, "y'all aren't from around here", I kinda got anxious, but it turned out he was a nice person and even educated and just desperate for a decent conversation.

Amarillo is a shit hole, and Lubbock is even worse, probably the most toxic air I have ever had to endure, it was nauseating.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Freshparsnip@lemm.ee 50 points 2 days ago

Welcome to the beginnings of genocide

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] thorhop@sopuli.xyz 17 points 1 day ago

The same for fascists and nazis then too, right?

OoOooOO!! Someone likes a STWONG MAN :3 UwU You gonna suck Trump's dick? That's very LGBTQ+ of you...

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world 85 points 2 days ago

Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk must have a lot of cases to handle since seemingly every far right case is filed in his court. We’re going to have so many judicial reforms to enact to bring back even the semblance of rule of law but add venue shopping to the list.

[-] rbos@lemmy.ca 22 points 2 days ago

You have to wonder what this guy gets up to in private. Has anyone checked Grindr in his area?

[-] smeenz@lemmy.nz 5 points 1 day ago

Do you even need to check ?

[-] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 1 points 17 hours ago

I'm always online actually

[-] GroundedGator@lemmy.world 42 points 2 days ago

Seems to me that if you can discriminate on gender identity and sexual orientation, you should be able to discriminate on any basis at all. Maybe next time this asshole goes out to dinner, he should be served like the little bitch he is. Bring his food and drink in pet bowls and remove his silverware.

[-] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 20 points 2 days ago

They would wholeheartedly agree with you because they can buy their way out of discrimination and we can't.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] RedditIsDeddit@lemmy.world 79 points 2 days ago

it's amazing to me how many people take pride in bigotry

[-] tacosplease@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

They should feel afraid instead. We've been slacking

[-] LMurch@thelemmy.club 18 points 1 day ago

How Christian of them.

[-] RabbitBBQ@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Many states never agreed with LGBT people having employment at all. Much of the history involves homelessness as a result of not being able to have sustained work because in many states, society would label and sabotage the ability for LGBT or people believed to be LGBT to have employment which is necessary to maintain housing. It was very much a sustained, methodical, approach that was taken. This is true going back to the Lavendar Scare in the Federal Govt, where like rooting out communists during the McCarthy era, they made sure to take all the Govt jobs away from anyone believed to be gay. Discrimination at work is a key means of taking away the right for someone to work.

Now they have many new weapons to enforce this end result in the lives of people living in the states that want to bring this back.

[-] valkyrieangela 5 points 1 day ago
[-] KulunkelBoom@lemm.ee 28 points 2 days ago

He's not a judge - he's a right wing mouthpiece playing to goddists. What a piece of shit.

[-] fedupwithbureaucracy@lemmy.world 30 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Why can’t people be punished for being anti-lgbt? There is no non-religious reason to belive so and religion is an invalid reason. Because these people deserve punishment.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] dotslashme@infosec.pub 40 points 2 days ago

Just wow! I can't even express how dumbstruck I am by idiocy like this.

About damn time! These fucking leftists were so mean to me by imposing onto me that I can't harrass people based on their sexuality! Like... what kind of world are we leaving our children if they can't even discriminate others peacefully?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Armok_the_bunny@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago

Oh hey, it's this asshole. This guy is the reason I reacted to that news about making all court rulings only apply locally with some humorous positivity. (also because humor helps me cope with general awfulness)

[-] AdamEatsAss@lemmy.world 37 points 2 days ago

All people are created equal (terms and conditions apply)

[-] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 1 points 17 hours ago

They had slaves when they wrote that. Terms and conditions always applied.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 19 May 2025
598 points (100.0% liked)

politics

23571 readers
3336 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS