164
submitted 2 years ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

FAA warns of possible defect in Boeing 777 engines::undefined

all 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Ameripol@lemmy.world 59 points 2 years ago

Seems like the title is a bit deceptive. It mentions multiple airliners from both Boeing and Airbus, that are potentially in need of having engine components replaced, due to defects introduced by GE Aerospace.

[-] Ameripol@lemmy.world 26 points 2 years ago

FTA: "As per FlightGlobal, the FAA’s proposal is the latest in a series of regulatory actions that have been taken in response to the discovery of iron inclusion in several types of GE Aerospace engines, including the GEnx and CFM International Leap turbofans. The GEnx powers Boeing 787 aircraft, while the Leap powers Boeing 737 Max and Airbus A320neo-family aircraft."

[-] malloc@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

Boeing executives need to be jailed and the company needs to be restructured immediately

While I don’t necessarily disagree with the sentiment, you must also understand that Boeing makes precisely zero engines for its commercial airframes. In the context of this article, the companies you should direct your ire to are GE and CFM International.

[-] FaeDrifter@midwest.social 2 points 2 years ago

Having been an insider in the industry, absolutely yes, GE is a shitshow. The schedules and budgets are too tight and don't allow for mistakes, and engineers are terrified to come forward when they find issues.

Wow, that’s… alarming. I didn’t know their engineering culture had degraded that much. I’ve got an uncle who’s a Mech E who worked there for years and loved it, but he left well over a decade ago to work in renewables.

[-] FaeDrifter@midwest.social 1 points 2 years ago

Its a problem across the entire aerospace industry, I saw the same thing at P&W too.

I was not at all surprised that the chickens came to roost in the 737 Max crashes. I suspect a lot of the issues come from the FAA allowing companies to cut corners for cost savings.

And even more issues came to a head when the FAA delegated inspections and audits to the companies they were supposed to be inspecting and auditing in the first place. I mean… what the fuck. That’s OBVIOUSLY completely idiotic.

[-] Earthwormjim91@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago

For buying engines from GE? That also affect Airbus jets too?

Like what are you saying.

[-] GameWarrior@discuss.online 5 points 2 years ago

That they also didn’t even buy because its the customer that buys the engines.

Not sure why people are downvoting you, because that’s more or less exactly how buying a factory-fresh civil airliner works.

[-] WigglingWalrus@feddit.uk 2 points 2 years ago

Glad you spoke up, let's get you in as new CEO..

-Boeing’s board, in the mid 90s

[-] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 years ago

Dead bodies

This is the metric that the FAA and aircraft manufacturers use to fix a problem.

If the body count rises to triple digits then they'll think of doing something.

The type of bodies also matter. A North America or European one is equivalent to two Asians or five Africans.

this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2023
164 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

73190 readers
3921 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS