859
submitted 1 day ago by abobla@lemm.ee to c/technology@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] J52@lemmy.nz 7 points 1 hour ago

Haha, the kicker is that it's pure greed. With their prices they don't need it and could improve it with what the community wants, but $$$, hey... been away for nearly 2 years now, thought of tipping my toes in again but with that they can f... right off.

[-] Bebopalouie@lemmy.ca 35 points 8 hours ago
[-] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 32 points 9 hours ago

Either they have great technology, or they have great entertainment,” she said. “Our superpower has always been the fact that we have both.

Please. Your software is an image carousel and a video player.

[-] Zoomboingding@lemmy.world 12 points 8 hours ago

Eh to Netflix's credit, both their backend and frontend are much better than their competition. Much better ux, and streams much more consistently. We pick up a sub for a month here and there. But AI ads will make me never go back.

[-] madjo@feddit.nl 5 points 6 hours ago

What the fuck is up with that image of Wednesday?! It doesn’t look like Ortega’s Wednesday to me. Is it ai generated?

[-] Demonic74@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 hour ago

It looks like her to me but idk

[-] J52@lemmy.nz 1 points 1 hour ago

Looks like she's got a bad toothache or a dislocated jaw.

[-] GoodOleAmerika@lemmy.world 23 points 9 hours ago

Well piracy is the only way then.

[-] umbrella@lemmy.ml 38 points 10 hours ago

🏴‍☠️🏴‍☠️🏴‍☠️🏴‍☠️🏴‍☠️🏴‍☠️🏴‍☠️ cmon people, stop making netflix relevant

[-] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 6 points 7 hours ago

Ahhhh, man moving away from corps just keeps on giving (or in this case, doesn’t enshitify while proprietary ones do).

[-] MilitantAtheist@lemmy.world 51 points 12 hours ago

No they won't 🏴‍☠️

[-] Limonene@lemmy.world 18 points 10 hours ago

Rejecting Netflix fixes things for you and me, but the article says Netflix has 93 million ad-supported subscribers. I'm really worried about the amount of influence advertisers have on our society, and it's only getting worse. Even if you and I can be above the direct influence of these ads, many people are not, and those people are influencing you and me. This produces a dangerous secondary influence that can reach most of society, and just fills everyone's mind with lies, for hardly any cost.

[-] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 5 points 7 hours ago

Eh, people are dumb as bricks. If it's not ads it's some fake news, social media nonsense, ai bullshit. It's really pointless to worry about. You can either accept that you are sharing the planet with Trump voters and suckers who fell for NFTs or you will just go crazy.

[-] kalpol@lemm.ee 5 points 9 hours ago

No different than the decades of ad supported broadcast television.

[-] LordCrom@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago

Except I didn't pay a monthly fee for over the air TV. The Jeffersons didn't cost 4.99 a month

[-] RightEdofer@lemmy.ca 6 points 9 hours ago

Terrible argument. You can’t ignore scale. Algorithmic timelines increase efficacy and precision of ads tremendously. These platforms know exactly who to target with what ad, at what time, with what frequency to get the desired result. It’s like comparing a horse and buggy to a sports car.

Generative ads will be even worse because they can be made specifically to each individual.

[-] flambonkscious@sh.itjust.works 4 points 8 hours ago

Yes, that bit is terrifying

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Furbag@lemmy.world 17 points 10 hours ago

Is there a way to poison the well so badly and so irrevocably that corporations won't dare use generative AI for anything? Can we somehow trick these overgrown chatbots to speak ill of their masters in the form of direct-to-stream advertisements?

[-] balthazarsnakewizard@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

You would think it’s already there, tbh - whenever I see an AI generated ad, all I think is “wow, that’s a business I will never patronize if even their ads are bottom-of-the-barrel slop”

[-] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 12 points 10 hours ago

Ask Musk. He managed to do it on accident.

[-] MiyamotoKnows@lemmy.world 5 points 8 hours ago

Aside from 🏴‍☠️ there are simply too many legitimate pay streaming options in 2025 for Netflix to think they can do this. This will end like an arrogant urban cowboy being flung off a mechanical bull and I'm all for it.

[-] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 5 points 8 hours ago

Is your egg too expensive?
Look no further. Our egg is much smoother and can be worn with most garments.

EggEgg. For your egg.

[-] essteeyou@lemmy.world 31 points 13 hours ago

I was looking to cut down on subscriptions and picked Netflix as an experimental one. I haven't missed it at all. Things like this make me less likely to occasionally reactivate for a couple of months as I was originally planning.

I wonder when they'll see a big enough effect to break their current run of fucking over their customers.

[-] dmention7@lemm.ee 11 points 11 hours ago

I also thought I'd miss Hulu and Netflix a lot more than I do. What used to irk me so badly was how utterly shit Netflix is when you just want to sit down and find something new to watch. Their front page would be list after list of things like "Hot New Comedies" "Best Independent Films of 2025", "Classic Action Flicks" and somehow it always felt like the same 30 or 40 movies randomly shuffled together. So I'd spend 15 minutes scrolling through the same slop in different orders, get frustrated and search for a movie that I remembered wanting to watch, only to find that it was on none of the services I was subscribed to, and cost $8.99 for a single watch of a 20 year old movie.

We had been Netflix subscribers since the very start when they delivered discs through the mail. Kinda sad how they went from having virtually anything you could think of to watch (and having a halfway decent recommendation algorithm to boot!) to where they are today.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] J3ffJ4cks0n@lemm.ee 11 points 11 hours ago

If I down vote this does it show my disappointment of netflix or the OP? 🤔

[-] DeadNinja@lemmy.world 38 points 14 hours ago

The sooner people realize that the subscribers are nothing more than super-slow-boiled frogs to them, the better.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 14 May 2025
859 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

70031 readers
3918 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS