283
submitted 3 days ago by Gsus4@mander.xyz to c/politics@lemmy.world
all 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] orclev@lemmy.world 125 points 3 days ago

I don't think people should be taking medical advice from me

Says the guy in charge of the department responsible for medical advice.

This is one of the incredibly rare instances where I agree with something RFK Jr. says, I agree nobody should be taking medical advice from him. Now if he could fucking resign and you know stop giving medical advice that would be great.

[-] skvlp@lemm.ee 30 points 3 days ago

No one should take medical advice from him.

One should be able to get good medical advice from anyone in his position.

What’s wrong with this picture?

[-] AcidicBasicGlitch@lemm.ee 6 points 2 days ago

The Alex Jones defense. "Oh you guys thought I was serious? Lulz seems like that's kind of on you."

[-] neidu3@sh.itjust.works 10 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

To be fair, I think it holds true for any head of department of health (or whatever they're called) - that's a position that calls for organizational skills and not a medical doctorate. In the same way my project manager doesn't answer questions about clustered datastorage, that's what he has people like me for.
However, leading JFKJrs department also calls for common sense and skepticism towards conspiracy theories, two qualities he severely lacks. But at least he's right in that particular statement.

[-] Kraiden@kbin.earth 19 points 3 days ago

That's like saying he shouldn't be expected to give advice on Seroconversion kinetics*. You're right, but it's also not really the point.

He, like your manager, is responsible for taking the knowledge of the "engineers" and turning that into practical advice and/or legislation for the public.

Which he is not doing... Which has resulted in a body count... Which should at the very least cost him his job...

But if anyone thinks that's going to happen, they've not been paying attention.

*(I don't know what that is btw, that comes from wikipedia. It's some technical thing to do with vaccines)

[-] neidu3@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Yes, that's pretty much the 2nd half of my comment.

Also, my understanding is that seroconversion kinetics is about how fast your body starts making antibodies, how strong the resp9nse is and how it changes over time.

[-] Kraiden@kbin.earth 2 points 3 days ago

Lol, that was maybe a bad example then. I was just looking for a technical term that the general public wouldn't need to care about, but that all sounds like reasonably important information

[-] neidu3@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 days ago

You give me too much credit. I got curious and started googling, lol.

[-] Gsus4@mander.xyz 2 points 2 days ago

But...isn't the point that you need to know at least both? There should be thousands of people in the venn diagram between doctors and managers enough people to become health secretary: senior doctors, senior healthcare managers. Certainly not this dipshit.

[-] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

One of the requirements for administering any department is being able to tell when it’s doing its job, and for his position that means being able to tell good policies from bad ones.

[-] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 45 points 3 days ago

“Who do they think I am, the Secretary of Health?”

[-] carlossurf@lemmy.ca 27 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Lol says the guy in charge of the health department, this is literally satire at this point

[-] AcidicBasicGlitch@lemm.ee 12 points 2 days ago

Holy shit... This timeline is too dumb to ever be learned about in history books.

[-] j0ester@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

History loves repeating itself.

[-] Sunflier@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago

Oh? So your spot as the nation's top doctor is what? Just for show? Got it.

[-] j0ester@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

Donald’s whole administration is. Makes sense.

[-] nman90@lemmy.world 31 points 3 days ago

You are right, we should be getting it from an expert. So how did you get this job asshole? Oh right, you hopped on that Sunny D.

[-] Freshparsnip@lemm.ee 29 points 3 days ago

Well it's literally your job to know about health matters........a job you are wholly unqualified for and should quit!

[-] blakenong@lemmings.world 9 points 3 days ago

This is the most American thing I’ve heard all day (the rfk quote)

[-] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 22 points 3 days ago

We accept your resignation.

[-] Mk23simp 26 points 3 days ago

So he's resigning from his position, right?

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 22 points 3 days ago
[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

Then he shouldn't be HHS secretary.

[-] Gsus4@mander.xyz 16 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Is there any way to get rid of the guy based on this statement? I mean, a brick could do his job better by staying out of anything that already works.

[-] Zippygutterslug@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago

Giuliani suggested trial by combat, seems more reasonable today than it did then.

[-] AcidicBasicGlitch@lemm.ee 1 points 2 days ago

The end is nigh when Giuliani retrospectively seems a wise oracle by comparison.

[-] AcidicBasicGlitch@lemm.ee 2 points 2 days ago

Somebody write that down on list of good ideas to rebuild society after the collapse jic any humans survive:

  1. Hold public officials to the same standards anyone else bad at their job would be held to. Make accountable for own words and actions?
[-] blakenong@lemmings.world 3 points 3 days ago
[-] AcidicBasicGlitch@lemm.ee 1 points 2 days ago

Add to list of good ideas

[-] GeeDubHayduke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 days ago

"I don't think people should be taking financial advice from me, either. Or parental advice for that matter. Or party planning advice. Or interior decoration. Matter of fact, why is anybody listening to me at all?!?"

[-] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 11 points 3 days ago

Can we ask the worm? Is the worm in charge of the DHHS?

this post was submitted on 14 May 2025
283 points (100.0% liked)

politics

23526 readers
2288 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS