106
submitted 2 days ago by schizoidman@lemm.ee to c/europe@feddit.org

Preserving the British role in the F-35 jet fighter programme takes precedence over the need to comply with UK laws on arms export controls, or any UK obligation to prevent a genocide in Israel, UK government lawyers will argue in court this week.

top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] gibmiser@lemmy.world 42 points 2 days ago

Won't somebody think of the shareholders!

That used to be kinda funny... doesn't feel funny anymore.

[-] latenightnoir 19 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

There was a time when I was certain that this sort of people will inevitably see that money will not save anyone from anything. Given how things are evolving, however, I've become convinced that they'll still be thinking of profit margins as the planet literally starts boiling and their skin starts to melt.

[-] Ooops@feddit.org 16 points 2 days ago

You are wrong... they need to increase their profit margins even more, so they can afford the neccessary protection for themselves while they watch everyone else's skin melt.

[-] latenightnoir 10 points 2 days ago

And it still won't save them... the only way we'll get through this is by working together.

[-] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

Wasn't it Lenin that said, when we hang the second last capitalist, the last one will sell us the rope to do it?

[-] floofloof@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 days ago

I watched Don't Look Up for the first time the other day, and it's an unfortunately very plausible illustration of what you describe.

[-] Mycatiskai@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 days ago

It was good and I'd love to watch that movie again but it was too real. The only problem with our reality is that the people who would find the problems like in that movie have probably already been laid off.

[-] Saleh@feddit.org 15 points 2 days ago

He added that it would “undermine US confidence in the UK and Nato at a critical juncture in our collective history and set back relations”, and could cause “adversaries” to “take advantage of any perceived weakness”.

Parts of the minister’s evidence on behalf the defence ministry was provided in public, but defence ministry officials have claimed any decision to restrict supply of F-35 parts is a matter for the F-35 executive steering board, a body that only acts by consensus. It added more than 1,000 F-35s currently operate with a high proportion undertaking either UK or Nato operations.

Making such judgments about national security, the government has argued, is primarily to be a matter for the executive.

In other words the UK government says it has no control over its own security and instead sees itself at the mercy of the US and following their whims. As Russia is the most serious adversary currently threatening the UK and there is extensive ties between the Trump administration and Russia, this argument is self contradictory at best and treacherous at worst.

If this was about national security the UK government would take urgent steps to limit its dependence on a foreign government that is evidently influenced by the main military adversary of the UK.

[-] jonne@infosec.pub 6 points 2 days ago

Australia is in the same boat security wise. AUKUS is a scam.

[-] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The UK mainstream politics has been Fascist-adjacent for a while now...

[-] CaptObvious@literature.cafe 5 points 2 days ago

Dammit, now the UK is playing Not the Onion

this post was submitted on 12 May 2025
106 points (100.0% liked)

Europe

5865 readers
1137 users here now

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in !yurop@lemm.ee. (They're cool, you should subscribe there too!)
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media. Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to any of the mods: @federalreverse@feddit.org, @poVoq@slrpnk.net, or @anzo@programming.dev.

founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS