459
submitted 3 days ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

White House proposes giving out $5,000 checks to address falling birthrates amid growing ‘pronatalist’ movement

One of Donald Trump’s priorities for his second term is getting Americans to have more babies – and the White House has a new proposal to encourage them to do so: a $5,000 “baby bonus”.

The plan to give cash payments to mothers after delivery shows the growing influence of the “pronatalist” movement in the US, which, citing falling US birthrates, calls for “traditional” family values and for women – particularly white women – to have more children.

But experts say $5,000 checks won’t lead to a baby boom. Between unaffordable health care, soaring housing costs, inaccessible childcare and a lack of federal parental leave mandates, Americans face a swath of expensive hurdles that disincentivize them from having large families – or families at all – and that will require a much larger government investment to overcome.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] card797@champserver.net 1 points 1 day ago

I bet it will have the opposite effect.

[-] rumba@lemmy.zip 15 points 2 days ago

He "could" TOTALLY pay his way into a baby boom.

Step 1: Tax the rich. Lower the pressure on the lower and middle classes.

Step 2: Fix housing pricing so that a single hard-working person can afford a house, a car, and two kids without their partner having to work.

Step 3: Put some guardrails in place to stop the 2-3 companies that are buying up everything. Give medium and small business a chance to thrive without needing to be purchased by a giant company.

Step 4. Fix healthcare so that the family above gets 100% coverage for whatever happens. Pay for it with Step 1.

[-] adm@lemm.ee 27 points 2 days ago

Just birthing the damn thing is like $50,000. He can shove the $5,000 right up his ass and I hope he gets paper cuts up there too.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] opus86@lemmy.today 28 points 2 days ago

This is how you get Idiocracy. The people that would take advantage of this would be the people you don't want to over-breed.

[-] BlackSheep@lemmy.ca 11 points 2 days ago

The people that would take advantage of this would be the people completely lacking in critical thinking.

[-] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 5 points 2 days ago

Thats mostly what happned in Australia back in the day when we tried it. Mu friends wife was a social worker, she said coercion to have babies was endemic and the money taken off the mother by the asshat father when said money arrived. Not really a lack of critical thinking per se, just desperate :(

What a debacle.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] COASTER1921@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 days ago

And the same people who are likely to vote for whoever his fascist successor ends up being.

[-] ours@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

In any case this combined with his dismantling of public education will certainly not help.

[-] Critical_Thinker@lemm.ee 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Wow, look at that! The price of strollers just went up 5k!

Replace strollers with basically anything related to birth or infants. 5k more to spend? 5k more to earn by big business selling wares.

This assumes the hospital doesn't determine that you seem to owe 5k more for that one out of network service provider they slipped in while you were distracted during birthing.

[-] Tire@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 days ago

I hate our healthcare system so much. Individual bills for random doctors you never asked for that are somehow working for the hospital but are unrelated in terms of their insurance policy makes zero sense. How could anyone consent to anything in a reasonable fashion

[-] Critical_Thinker@lemm.ee 2 points 2 days ago

Preach. I can do nothing but agree, and I have insider info in the insurance industry, pharma and healthcare. It's all a game to make the rich even richer and the politicians are colluding in such a bipartisan fashion you'd think the parties were fully unified.

[-] Wilco@lemm.ee 88 points 3 days ago

$5000? Does Trump still think it's the 1950s?

[-] cmbabul@lemmy.world 47 points 3 days ago

I sizable chunk of the populace seems to harbor similar delusions

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] mcv@lemm.ee 25 points 3 days ago

Does Trump still think it's the 1950s?

Very likely, yes.

[-] prole 21 points 3 days ago

It's just a child, Michael. How much could it cost?

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] MolecularCactus1324@lemmy.world 22 points 2 days ago

Build massive amounts of new housing. Give people paid parental leave, and universal healthcare. Guaranteed baby boom.

[-] The_Caretaker@lemm.ee 22 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

There is no housing shortage, just an abundance of greed. There are 14,000,000 empty homes in the USA and most are owned by corporations who hold them as part of a financial portfolio or hedge funds. Ban corporations from owning residential properties and the housing shortage will vanish without cutting down more trees and burning more fossil fuels.

[-] MolecularCactus1324@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Idk man, around me it’s sprawling single family homes for miles, when it should be blocks and blocks of condos and town homes. The NIMBYs have prevented construction for decades and now a house costs $1.5m. There is a housing shortage. I think corporations recently taking an interest in buying houses is because the shortage makes their value appreciate so quickly. They’re like parasites taking advantage of the situation, not the root cause.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] IamSparticles@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 days ago

You'd also have to subsidize childcare. It's crazy expensive.

[-] angrystego@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

Do we really need a baby boom though? I agree we need affordable housing, everything you mentioned and more. At the same time I don't think the population should grow forever (so education and available birth control).

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Formfiller@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago

He’s making everything more expensive, gutting medicade to nothing (50% of babies are born on medicade), taking away food stamps, getting rid of the department of education, gutting hud, gutting head start, getting rid of free lunches in schools, sending us into a Great Depression, stripping worker protections and removing any hope for a future….but yeah 5k sure that will cover your first 15 minutes of delivery. What a joke this man is

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] adrian@50501.chat 72 points 3 days ago

Give me one year paid family leave and Medicare for all, then we'll talk.

[-] SuiXi3D@fedia.io 23 points 3 days ago

Maybe a grant for college as well, so I can get a degree so that I might actually be able to participate in society at large.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] PopcornPrincess@lemmy.world 18 points 3 days ago

Seriously, a one time payment that low won’t cover shit. The climate doesn’t support families to begin with like your comment points out.

Also you can’t ask people to have kids and cut funding to Medicaid & be actively dismantling Department of Education.. It’s counterintuitive to say we support families and then not support families. Oh but here’s some money.

[-] PancakeTrebuchet@lemmy.world 38 points 3 days ago

My wife and I would consider another kid if the fed wanted to kick us an extra $25k per year.

A one time fee of $5K is hilarious. You'd maybe be able to cover the hospital bill from having the kid with that sum.

[-] 5too@lemmy.world 16 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

You’d maybe be able to cover the hospital bill from having the kid with that sum.

If there's no complications.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago

It's not even his idea.

https://taxfoundation.org/blog/hillary-clintons-proposal-5000-baby-bond-essentially-already-here/

Sen. Hillary Clinton’s plan to give every newborn a $5,000 bond, money meant to defray college costs when the kids hit 18, continued to draw criticism yesterday from her right-wing rivals.

“It’s a quick way of trying to buy votes, which is irresponsible when it comes to the economic future of the nation,” said New York Conservative Party chief Mike Long, adding that the White House would have to raise taxes to finance the plan.

The bonds would cost about $20 billion a year, based on the 4million American babies born annually, according to Time magazine, which last month proposed a similar plan.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] crystalmerchant@lemmy.world 59 points 3 days ago

Lmaooo no shit it won't work. Daycare alone is $20-$40k a year. A pittance one-time payment doesn't change the fundamental calculus of how fucking expensive everything is now

[-] pomfegranate@sh.itjust.works 21 points 3 days ago

Why can't countries understand quality of life leads to more of those productive babies they really want

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Ironfist79@lemmy.world 34 points 3 days ago

I thought Republicans were against giving people handouts?

[-] RedditIsDeddit@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago

Only if Democrats are the ones doing the handouts. Trump was very happy to sign all those stim checks during covid. Didn't hear them bitching about socialism and communism then.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ExtantHuman@lemm.ee 35 points 3 days ago

They're pretending to offer incentives while their actual policies are why birth rates are declining.

5k won't even cover the hospital costs for the birth. Let alone the child care, continuing to insure that child, food, housing, child care because both parents need to work, education which they've been staying refunding for decades...

[-] timeghost@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago

They want people who aren't smart enough to realize this having more babies.

[-] matdave@lemmy.ml 16 points 2 days ago

Literally cost us $11k in medical bills to have a baby. That doesn't include the cost of actually maintaining it either. $5k is a JOKE

[-] BigBenis@lemmy.world 27 points 3 days ago

"What could raising a child cost? $5000?"

"You've never actually raised a child, have you?"

[-] RedditIsDeddit@lemmy.world 35 points 3 days ago

anyone else think this shit is fucking weird?

[-] dhork@lemmy.world 28 points 3 days ago

It makes more sense when you realize that money has solved all of Donald Trump's problems in the past. Get a little too handsy with a woman? Pay her off to keep quiet. Have a business partnership or contract you want to get out of? Pay lawyers to harass them in court until they give up.

Heck, he doesn't even need to use his own money most of the time, he can spend out of one of his companies like it's a slush fund then declare bankruptcy, leaving business partners and banks with the bills.

He is now running the government like one of his privately owned companies, and using our money to try and solve his problems. Give them a pittance to go away, and when they don't, you can say "we gave them a chance" before kidnapping them.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] selokichtli@lemmy.ml 18 points 3 days ago

I'm not American. I thought "$5k/month for sure". Lol.

[-] Microplasticbrain@lemm.ee 12 points 2 days ago

Or they could just forgive the student loans haha, they are so stupid.

[-] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

$5k is roughly 1/4 the cost...

... of a birth.

Alone. Just, average medical costs of a birth, without insurance.

https://www.forbes.com/advisor/health-insurance/how-much-does-it-cost-to-have-a-baby/

https://www.uwhealth.org/news/how-much-does-it-really-cost-have-baby

... And they are slashing Medicaid.

If you do have insurance... $5k is about half the cost of a birth.

So... congrats, you can have two kids, and then uh lol have fun paying the cost of raising two kids, which is about half a million dollars.

And that's just to 18, btw, this assumes those kids can find a job immediately after high school and move out into a place they can afford on an entry level income.

Which uh, is basically wildly unrealistic at this point.

Because all entry level jobs require 2-3 years of experience.

And housing costs are insane.

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago

$5k when having a kid costs $3k in insurance copays with a normal birth and average insurance. So you’re down to $2k before even leaving the hospital. This dude has all the intellectual depth and forethought of a mushroom.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Stovetop@lemmy.world 25 points 3 days ago

Why do I have a feeling the administration would still try to find ways to not pay nonwhite families having kids?

Trump was propped up by people who believe this bogus "Great Replacement" theory and I don't think they would be willing to back down from that stance on account of a generally declining population.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] SCmSTR 12 points 3 days ago

Guillotine time

[-] Sgt_choke_n_stroke@lemmy.world 15 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Throwing money at people won't cause a baby boom. YOU NEED TO MAKE CHILD CARE AND HOUSING CHEAPER!! GIVE PEOPLE HOPE AND CHILDREN WILL FOLLOW!

I know I'm screaming into a void but I feel like it needs to be said.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 18 points 3 days ago

Is $5000 gonna resurrect my wife if my shit ass state policies force her to continue a dangerous pregnancy and she dies prior to giving birth? Also, fuck you.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Nojustice@lemmy.ml 15 points 3 days ago

Hilarious that the only concept he can come up with is UNDER paying for things he wants hahahahaha

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Mallspice@lemm.ee 6 points 2 days ago

Yeah girls don’t really wanna fuck like they do where/when abortions are an option and there’s no chance of legally being sentenced to death because of a still birth I’m shocked conservatives are too stupid to get this.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 06 May 2025
459 points (100.0% liked)

News

29268 readers
4387 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS