476
submitted 1 year ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Shoppers in Texas no longer have to pay a sales tax on menstrual products, making the state one of the few in the nation to eliminate the so-called "tampon tax."

A new law that went into effect Friday eliminates the sales tax on feminine hygiene products including items like tampons, menstrual pads and menstrual cups.

In addition to menstrual products, the law, S.B. 379, also eliminates the sales tax on family care items including diapers, baby bottles, baby wipes, maternity clothing and breast milk pump products.

all 45 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] odium@programming.dev 77 points 1 year ago

Color me surprised, was not expecting this from Texas.

[-] CameronDev@programming.dev 60 points 1 year ago

Bizarrely, they have accidentally implemented an actual pro life policy

[-] Kerred@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

According to the links, the law was sponsored by Donna Howard (Dem) and Angie Button (Rep). Said 13 yays and 4 abstained from the financial committee.

Hopefully women constituents from both sides encouraged their reps to push forward.

[-] tdawg@lemmy.world 55 points 1 year ago

Did... did Texas just do something right for once?

[-] CreativeShotgun@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago

During the same session they banned drag shows in such a vague way that a trans person playing guitar in a public place could be fined or even arrested for sexual performance. Also made it illegal to refuse to identify yourself to police

[-] SuiXi3D@kbin.social 16 points 1 year ago

Even a stopped clock is right twice a day.

[-] NightAuthor@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

I’m guessing it’s for the wrong reasons. I imagine it’s a pro-procreation move.

[-] hroderic@lemmy.world 45 points 1 year ago

Likely trying to score some points with female voters after rolling back Roe v Wade

[-] BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.world 38 points 1 year ago

I'm sure there's some Republican politician someplace in Texas saying that women have the ability to shut their periods down if they try, and they don't need socialist tampons.

[-] Rachelhazideas@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

God I want a socialist tampon inside me so bad. Socialism is so hot.

[-] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 36 points 1 year ago

This is great - but is the "tampon tax" just "normal sales tax"?

[-] revelrous@sopuli.xyz 28 points 1 year ago

Yep. But other medical products have been exempt the whole time.

[-] SheeEttin@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago
[-] girlfreddy@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Yes. Problem is it only affects 50% of the population.

It would be fair(er) if it taxed Viagra at the same rate.

[-] UltraFiestaMango@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago

lol why do idiots always say this? no one NEEDS to use viagra - ever. Can't get it up? deal with it. But half of the population NEEDS menstrual products, or there will be blood everywhere and that's a biohazard.

[-] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

I get what you're saying and agree, but damn that's a "heavy flow" day.

Women dealt with this issue for thousands of years without it being a like a scene from Carrie.

[-] Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 year ago

Or condoms, except in many states condoms actually are subject to sales tax like most other goods. Prescription drugs in general aren't subject to sales tax, which is why Viagra wasn't, same as birth control pills, insulin, blood thinners, etc.

[-] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

I don't understand how that is a "problem".

[-] Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 year ago

Yeah, but it sounds more like a special imposition placed on women for being women if we talk about the "tampon tax" instead of arguing about whether or not there should be special cutouts on sales tax for products used primarily or exclusively by women.

[-] Natanael@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 year ago

There are places with "luxury taxes" on some of those items

[-] Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago

Usually only in places where that luxury tax rate is actually lower than the general sales tax. If you have a contrary example, I'm curious.

[-] glacier 17 points 1 year ago

Rare Texas W

[-] xylogx@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

This look to me like an advocacy group successfully advocating for common sense legislation:

“Advocates for menstrual equity who oppose a tax on menstrual products say the taboo around menstruation and the lack of access to menstrual products hurts women economically because it costs them money for products and may keep them from attending jobs and school. Poor menstrual hygiene poses health risks for women, including reproductive issues and urinary tract infections.”

this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2023
476 points (100.0% liked)

News

23376 readers
1638 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS