557
submitted 5 months ago by Redditsux@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 10 points 5 months ago

Lmao fuck that and fuck you, Slotkin.

[-] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 10 points 5 months ago

This is the DINO that went on after HitlerPig's SOTU and tried to sell the absurd concept that millions of people voted straight Democratic tickets, except for HitlerPig at the top.

Sure, there were probably some dummies rhat did that, but they're as rare as white squirrels. She's just the water carrier for the same old weak, spineless weenie Dems who are perfectly happy being smug about their "peaceful transfer of power" to Nazis who obviously rigged the election.

[-] kandoh@reddthat.com 10 points 5 months ago

The problem with people with no moral or intellectual compass is that they just look around them for what's 'working' and attempt to copy that.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Roopappy@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago

I know how she can test her theory.

Run a primary opponent against her who feels differently. Let the market decide.

[-] Sibshops@lemm.ee 10 points 5 months ago

Well, I'm just going to go extra woke, now. Go woke or go broke.

[-] harmsy@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago

Sounds like a moron who needs to be primaried.

[-] tronx4002@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Seems to be an unpopular opinion, but she is right. I think the people upset with her in the comments do not live in red areas.

As stupid as it sounds, that is all people seem to care about. The right used to have abortion as a drum to bang. Now that Roe is overturned the right needed a new social cause, and they found 'woke' which is WAY more effective than abortion since it seems to excite both religious, and non-religious.

If you go and talk with people in rural areas you will be shocked by how prominent this issue is in their minds, and I believe it will always beat economic issues for them.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] MehBlah@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago

Just another clueless asshole.

[-] Witchfire@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Controlled opposition

I have no regrets leaving

[-] selkiesidhe@lemm.ee 8 points 5 months ago

Who gives a shit about some stupid label the MAGAt morons have come up with??? Fascism needs to go! That should be the resounding message here!

[-] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago

"Dem senator is a compromised lackey"

Yeah, no shit. That's the problem.

[-] Wilco@lemm.ee 8 points 5 months ago

Can you tell us you have been purchased by the oligarchy without telling us?

End "woke"? So let Republicans shred all DEI? That's not just trans/gay, it's anti racial discrimination, it is help and protection for the disabled ... hell, it is the very laws that make ramps and elevators required for the disabled.

Yes, I might be talked into agreeing that democrats have to tone down "the message" so Republicans cannot use it as a hate rallying cry ... but the goals are still there. The evil fascist stuff this admin has done must be reversed, and these people all need to be in jail for insider trading by ping-ponging the economy.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Maeve@kbin.earth 8 points 5 months ago

“Everyone you mentioned has a lot of words, but what have they actually done to change the situation with Donald Trump and the cuts and the attacks on our judiciary and the attacks on our Constitution?” asked Slotkin, who claimed her responsibilities fighting Trump’s government cuts forced her “to be more than just an AOC.”

Fair.

“I can’t do what she does because we live in a purple state, and I’m a pragmatist,” she concluded.

🙄

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Bosht@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago

Hooray another sack of shit politician attempting to derail from real issues

[-] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 8 points 5 months ago

I feel like the headline conveys a different message than even what the article does:

“She said Democrats should stop using the term ‘oligarchy,’ a phrase she said doesn’t resonate beyond coastal institutions, and just say that the party opposes ‘kings,'”

argued that the Democratic Party needed to lose its “weak and woke” reputation and “fucking retake the flag,” adopting a “goddamn Alpha energy”

https://www.politico.com/news/2025/04/24/slotkin-has-a-war-plan-to-beat-trump-dont-be-weak-and-woke-00308176

She's literally saying the word oligarchy sounds pretentious and an opposition to kings resonates better, and that people think the party is weak and they need to present themselves more aggressively.

Click bait is click bait.

[-] aesthelete@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

“She said Democrats should stop using the term ‘oligarchy,’ a phrase she said doesn’t resonate beyond coastal institutions, and just say that the party opposes ‘kings,'”

Doesn't resonate beyond the coastal institutions such as.... Iowa? and Montana? Where Bernie and AOC did giant rallies?

This milquetoast Republican-lite act doesn't really resonate anywhere including coastal institutions. Look at the results of the last election cycle. The difference is that on the coasts there are enough people with money that'll vote to keep the status quo going. Life is good enough here that the people here can still -- and just barely -- imagine a future.

In the middle of the country where everyone's broke and things are thoroughly hopeless, they see little difference between keeping the status quo going and burning it all to the ground.

That's exactly where and why Trump's "take the country back" rhetoric works. The country is screwed up and pretty obviously not going to be made dramatically better by silly little neoliberal plans such as a tax break for opening a new small business or whatever.

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] ABetterTomorrow@lemm.ee 7 points 5 months ago

Get her out, outdated mindset.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 25 Apr 2025
557 points (100.0% liked)

politics

25970 readers
2455 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS