227
all 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Ulrich@feddit.org 88 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

tl:dw some the testing shows 300-500% improvements in the 16GB model. Some games are completely unplayable on 8GB while delivering an excellent experience on the 16GB.

It really does seem like Nvidia is intentionally trying to confuse their own customers for some reason.

[-] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 34 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

It really does seem like Nvidia is intentionally trying to confuse their own customers for some reason.

Its moreso for OEM system integrators, who can buy up thousands of these 5060ti's and sell them in systems as 5060Ti's, and the average Joe who buys prebuilts won't know to go looking at the bottom half of the tech sheet to see if its an 8 or 16.
As well as yes, direct scamming consumers, because Jensen needs more leather jackets off the AI craze and couldn't give a rats ass about gamers.

[-] MBech@feddit.dk 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I agree that they don't give half a shit about their actual product, but their biggest competitor has never been more competitive, and Nvidia knows it. Pissing off your costumer base when you don't have a monopoly is fucking stupid, and Nvidia and the prebuilt manufacturers knows this. It's business 101.

There's gotta be something else. I know businesses aren't known for making long term plans, because all that will ever matter to them is short term profits. But this is just way too stupid to be because of that.

[-] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 months ago

There’s gotta be something else.

That something else is that they don't need the gamer market. Providing consumer cards is literally an inconvenience for them at this point, they make 2 billion a quarter from gaming cards but 18 billion on datacenter compute, with some insane 76% gross margins on those products they sell (to continue funding R&D).

[-] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 17 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

To me it sounds like they are preying on the gamer who isn't tech savvy or are desperate. Just a continuation of being anti-consumer and anti-gamer.

[-] nekusoul@lemmy.nekusoul.de 2 points 2 months ago

Yup. This is basically aimed at the people who only know that integrated GPUs are bad and they need a dedicated card, so system manufacturers can create a pre built that technically checks that box for as little money as possible.

[-] recursive_recursion@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

It really does seem like Nvidia is intentionally trying to confuse their own customers for some reason.

for money/extreme greed

[-] Ulrich@feddit.org 3 points 2 months ago

Okay well that's the low-hanging fruit but explain to me the correlation? How does confusing their customers fuel their greed?

[-] recursive_recursion@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 months ago

Uninformed buyers will buy the 8GB card get a poor experience and will be forced to buy a new card sooner than later.

[-] Ulrich@feddit.org 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

So their strategy is making and selling shitty cards at high prices? Don't you think that would just make consumers consider a competing brand in the future?

[-] gaael@lemm.ee 6 points 2 months ago

For most consumers it might not, the amount of nvidia ~~propaganda~~ advertisement in games is huge.

[-] MBech@feddit.dk 3 points 2 months ago

Yea I don't know why buying a shitty product should convince me to throw more money at the company. They don't have a monopoly, so I would just go to their competitor instead.

[-] BCsven@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago

It's like teens and IPhones, they don't care if they pickup a used 3 year old iPhone for more money than a new Android, they want the iPhone branding

[-] frazorth@feddit.uk 1 points 2 months ago

The reviews said that it was a better card than the other brand.

Just imagine how bad those must have been!

They don't know they've been ripped off.

[-] WormFood@lemmy.world 65 points 2 months ago

it is 2019, the 2060ti has 8gb of vram. it is 2020, the 3060ti has 8gb of vram. it is 2023, the 4060ti has 8gb of vram. it is 2025, the 5060ti has 8gb of vram.

[-] nik282000@lemmy.ca 17 points 2 months ago

My 1080 from 2017 has 8gb of vram. Still works fine.

[-] Schmuppes@lemmy.today 4 points 2 months ago

If you play games that weren't released after 2022, sure.

[-] Saryn@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Regular GTX 1080 here. Running Space Marine 2 at 60 fps on 1080p on mid-ish settings. And that's basically the most graphics-intensive games I've played recently. Games like Total Warhammer 3, Dark Deity 2, Factorio or Heroes of the Storm don't care about the GPU and play great at 1080p.

Speaking of, what is the next best cost-efficient GOAT in the generations that followed the GTX 10 series? I'm gonna be needing a new GOAT at some point in the future - would love to hear recommendations.

[-] SharkAttak@kbin.melroy.org 2 points 2 months ago

I'm also interested in the answer to this; as a fellow 1080p gamer, a quick research had me hovering around an Intel A770, the only one offering 16gb at my target price of around €300, but I'm open to suggestions.

[-] AllHailTheSheep@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

you can absolutely run newer titles with a 1080/1080ti. maybe not at 4k max settings, but a little bit of compromise should easily get at least 60fps in most titles.

[-] CanadianCarl@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 months ago

I am pretty sure you can run Animal Well, at 4k max. It came out last year also.

[-] AllHailTheSheep@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago

I was assuming the commenter I replied to was talking about unoptimized AAA games that overly rely on on DLSS.

animal well looks cool tho I'll have to check it out! love the art style.

[-] CanadianCarl@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

My 3060 has 12gb of vram...

[-] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

You probably have to return the 4gb extra then.

[-] filister@lemmy.world 47 points 2 months ago

The whole fact that NVIDIA is not allowing AIBs to send the 8GB card to reviewers is quite telling. They are simply banking on illiterate purchasers, system integrators to sell this variant. That's another low for NVIDIA but hardly surprising anyone.

Planned obsolescence.

[-] sleep_deprived@lemmy.dbzer0.com 39 points 2 months ago

This is worse than planned obsolescence. This is basically manufactured ewaste.

[-] HeyJoe@lemm.ee 4 points 2 months ago

I agree, but it is still crazy that there are people out there making $500 plus purchases without the smallest bit of research. I really hope this card fails only for the reason that it deserves to.

[-] nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 2 months ago

why the fuck is a 50 series Ti card having only 8gb of vram

[-] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

Maybe it has an Sd slot or something?

[-] Alaknar@lemm.ee 3 points 2 months ago

Because it's the low-end xx60? Also, apparently Nvidia did some high-tech magic that allows higher-res textures to be handled with less vRAM.

But, yeah, it's a 5060. You're not buying this to play in 4k Ultra.

[-] WereCat@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

This video clearly shows the NVIDIA magic is pooping in your own pants.

And the card even struggles at 1080p with 8GB...

[-] nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 months ago

I love to poop in my own pants

[-] WereCat@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

I mean that NVIDIA will poop your pants

[-] Droechai@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago

Is it firm or liquid?

[-] Alaknar@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago

So it's performing worse than 3060 or 4060?

[-] WereCat@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

In some instances, it performs worse than 3060 12GB. It does not perform worse than 4060 as both perform terribly when 8GB isn't enough

[-] Chadus_Maximus@lemm.ee 10 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Ever since the 40 series, you need to downgrade every card by 1 tier to get the actual product. Nvidia marketing gimmick.

RTX 4060 - RTX 4050

RTX 4060 Ti - RTX 4050 Ti

RTX 4070 - RTX 4060

RTX 4070 Super - higher clock speed RTX 4060

RTX 4070 Ti - RTX 4060 TI

RTX 4070 Ti Super - RTX 4070

RTX 4080 - RTX 4070 TI

RTX 4080 Super - RTX 4080

RTX 40?? - RTX 4080 TI. There definitely should have been a GPU in this bracket judging by transistor counts. Would eat into the insane 4090 margin though so it wasn't meant to be.

RTX 4090 is of course appropriately named.

[-] dumblederp@aussie.zone 12 points 2 months ago

Can we get a gpu that just has some ddr5 slots in it?

[-] Avg@lemm.ee 4 points 2 months ago

You would need so many channels for that to be viable.

[-] ikidd@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago
[-] SharkAttak@kbin.melroy.org 1 points 2 months ago

Why not many little simple sockets in which pop as many memory chips as needed?

[-] dumblederp@aussie.zone 1 points 2 months ago

ddr5 was just a placeholder in the above statement, whatever works. TPTB are welcome to release a line of gpu-ram with appropriate connections.

this post was submitted on 21 Apr 2025
227 points (100.0% liked)

PC Gaming

11746 readers
284 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS