As an artist, all y'all need to chill. The problem is capitalism, and it's not like artists make a living anyway. Democratizing art opens up a lot of possibilities, you technophobes.
Oh boy here we go downvotes again
regardless o the model you're using, the tech itself was developed and fine-tuned on stolen artwork with the sole purpose of replacing the artists who made it
that's not how that works. You can train a model on licensed or open data and they didn't make it to spite you even if a large group of grifters are but those aren't the ones developing it
If you're going to hate something at least base it on reality and try to avoid being so black-and-white about it.
Name one that is "ethically" sourced.
And "open data" is a funny thing to say. Why is it open? Could it be open because people who made it didn't expect it to be abused for ai? When a pornstar posted a nude picture online in 2010, do you think they thought of the idea that someone will use it to create deepfakes of random women? Please be honest. And yes, a picture might not actually be "open data" but it highlights the flaw in your reasoning. People don't think about what could be done to their stuff in the future as much as they should but they certainly can't predict the future.
Now ask yourself that same question with any profession. Please be honest and tell us, is that "open data" not just another way to abuse the good intentions of others?
Tools have always been used to replace humans. Is anyone using a calculator a shitty person? What about storing my milk in the fridge instead of getting it from the milk man?
I don't have an issue with the argument, but unless they're claiming that any tool which replaced human jobs were unethical then their argument is not self consistent and thus lacks any merit.
Edit: ~~notice how no one has tried to argue against this~~
People have begun discussing it, although i suppose it was an unfair expectation to have this discussion here. Regardless, after i originally edited this, you guys did have tons of discussions with me. I do appreciate it, and it seems that most of us support the same things. It kinda just seems like an issue with framing and looking at things in the now vs the mid term future.
This may come as a shock to you, but nobody was working as a refrigerator. Refrigerators didn't replace the milk man, the stores did. Which was fine at first since those stores were supposed to buy the milk from the milkman and just make it more readily accessible. Then human greed took over, the stores or big name brands started to fuck over the milk man, and conspired with other big name stores to artificially increase the price of bread while blaming covid and inflation, and now some, although few people are trying to buy it back from the milk man if they can afford / access it.
Those tools that did replace humans, did not steal human work and effort, in order to train themselves. Those tools did not try to replace human creativity with some soulless steaming pile of slop.
You see, I believe open source, ethically trained AI models can exist and they can accomplish some amazing things, especially when it comes to making things accessible to people with disabilities for an example. But Edd Coates' is specifically talking about art, design and generative AI. So, maybe, don't come to a community called "Fuck AI", change the original argument and then expect people argue against you with a good will.
You're a tool.
I guess it is inevitable that self centred ego-stroking bubble communities appear in platforms such as Lemmy. Where reasoned polite discussion is discouraged and opposing opinions are drowned.
Well, I'll just leave this comment here in the hope someone reads it and realises how bad these communities actually are. There's a lot to hate about AI (specially companies dedicated to sell it), but not all is bad. As any technology, is about how you use it and this kind of community is all about cancelling everything and never advance and improve.
Well the environmental costs are pretty high... One request to chatgpt 3.5 was guessed to be 100 times more expensive than a Google search request. Plus training.
This doesn't change no matter the use case. Same with the copyright issues.
Obviously not all AI is bad, but it's clear the current way GenAI is being developed, and the most popular, mainstream options are unethical. Being against the unethical part requires taking a stand against the normalization and widespread usage of these tools without accountability.
You're not the wise one amongst fools, you're just being a jerk and annoying folks who see injustice and try to do something about it.
I guess it's inevitable that self-centered, pseudo-intellectual individuals like you would appear in platforms such as Lemmy to ask for civility and attention while spouting bullshit.
I haven't heard of this before, but it looks interesting for game devs.
Game UI Database: https://www.gameuidatabase.com/index.php
Me either. Seems like it would be a really handy site to use if you were making your own game and wanted to see some examples or best practices.
Had no idea it existed, I don’t make games though. But it’s always so cool to see something built that serves a unique niche I had never thought of before! Consulting used to be like for me but after a while, it was always the same kinds of business problems just a different flavor of organization.
"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"
A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.
