503
top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Gregg@lemm.ee 148 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Gee I wonder where that money went… This just in: Narcissistic racist oligarch with a breeding fetish likely stole the money for his “legion” fund. Funny how both him and Epstein were obsessed with populating the earth with their progeny. Too bad only one of them is dead.

[-] ryrybang@lemmy.world 128 points 1 week ago

The man is a thief, but there's nothing to steal here. He's lowering his totally bogus $ amount that he supposedly saved the government based on contract and lease cancellations.

Every single contract (~10) that I know very specific details about that was DOGE-cancelled has a problematic "savings" amount on the doge.gov website. Every one is wrong. That's just the 10 I know about where I have privileged information. There's currently more than 8000 listed. I suspect most of those have similar issues with the reported "savings" amount.

This is straight accounting that they are botching.

Nevermind that the $ savings is bogus even if the accounting was accurate. Because these cancellations are costing the US taxpayer big-time in the long run.

[-] Gregg@lemm.ee 57 points 1 week ago

I appreciate your input and I acknowledge I’m being a reactionary jerk off. Thanks for doing what you do.

[-] ryrybang@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago
[-] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

There's a place for you both. One can bring the needed anger, the other can bring the details in case we can ever get some fucking justice in this world for these fucking fascist fucks. Myself, I wish a painful death on each of them. (NSA: I'm not going to cause their deaths, just rejoice when they die. They are thieving evil scumbags)

[-] ptz@dubvee.org 5 points 1 week ago
[-] LemmySilverBot@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Thank you for voting. You can vote again in 24 hours. leaderboard

[-] Sabin10@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

Man, anytime I have been under an NDA it's been about boring, mostly useless stuff related to Canadian telecom stuff or upcoming Microsoft products since I work in print and deal with those companies. I wish I got to see stuff like what you get to see, probably way more interesting than knowing the Xbox 360 would use an amd gpu instead of nvidia or that carrier A's pricing strategy is to copy carrier B.

[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Unless you really care about 3080 vs 3600 funding or fixed price vs cost plus contracts, government finances aren't all that exciting.

[-] P00ptart@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Literally the only creative bone in the Republican party is the accounting side.

[-] TheFogan@programming.dev 17 points 1 week ago

IMO I doubt there's actually theft of the savings... there's some real chaos. but the savings numbers are all made up with no tie to reality. Moneys not stolen, because the savings were never real... dude's managing to shut down half the functions of the government, lay off hundreds of thousands of people... and failing to reduce costs in the process.

[-] reddig33@lemmy.world 122 points 1 week ago

There are no “savings”. That was a cover story. This is about gaining access to data and firing anyone who might enforce rules.

[-] HubertManne@piefed.social 28 points 1 week ago

100% will cost more than it "saves" and result in a much less functional society.

[-] rimu@piefed.social 57 points 1 week ago

Elon Musk, the de facto head of DOGE, lowered expectations of the group’s savings from $1 trillion to $150 billion by the end of the fiscal year.

So, a failure even on their own terms.

[-] kn0wmad1c@programming.dev 17 points 1 week ago

He's going to have to move the goalposts to $10 to meet the expectations

[-] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago

And even then the "savings" will be shortterm. Wouldn't surprise me at all if you could draw a straight line to a trillion dollars lost over the next 10+ years caused directly by DOGE.

[-] jacksilver@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

At the rate we're going, I fear that may be an understatement.

[-] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Oh I just mean directly costing us tax dollars that could've been used wisely but instead will be wasted trying to fix things doge fucked up royally. The loss this administration has already caused to the economy as a whole is incalculable. Even if the tariffs get reversed and we recover modestly that would still be many billions stolen from the working class' retirement and other investment accounts.

[-] Rekhyt@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The original goal was 2 trillion. It's less than 1% of the original goal now.

Edit: Less than 10% which is still pathetic, but this is why I shouldn't do math in my head.

[-] Tja@programming.dev 2 points 1 week ago

150 billion is 7.5% of 2 trillion

[-] resipsaloquitur@lemm.ee 26 points 1 week ago

That’s weird. I thought he was making government more efficient to save taxpayers’ money.

[-] spykee@lemm.ee 14 points 1 week ago

What a shite webpage. No matter how many times I close the tiny stupid video window, it will spring up like bloody herpes with every touch. Yahoo, you're as bad as herpes. Eat shit.

[-] Freshparsnip@lemm.ee 9 points 1 week ago

Presumably being used for illegal bribes

[-] bus_factor@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Can't use made-up numbers for bribes.

this post was submitted on 17 Apr 2025
503 points (100.0% liked)

News

28981 readers
3840 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS