363
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 152 points 1 month ago

If a deal does not go through, it makes Labour look bad.

No it fucking doesnt. Not giving a fuck about US demands is the most popular thing you can do right now.

[-] N0body@lemmy.dbzer0.com 151 points 1 month ago

What exactly do LGBT issues have to do with trade policy? Why is this on the table? Is there supposed to be some big gay conspiracy to devalue currency or something? It’s all so idiotic.

[-] torrentialgrain@lemm.ee 108 points 1 month ago

The cruelty is the point.

[-] floo@retrolemmy.com 104 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

5: Fear of difference. “The first appeal of a fascist or prematurely fascist movement is an appeal against the intruders. Thus Ur-Fascism is racist by definition.”

12: Machismo and weaponry. “Machismo implies both disdain for women and intolerance and condemnation of nonstandard sexual habits, from chastity to homosexuality.”

Umberto Eco’s List of the 14 Common Features of Fascism

[-] tal@lemmy.today 10 points 1 month ago

I'd guess that it's probably broader than LGBT issues, if they're taking


and the article is not clear on this, and the source anonymous


issue with hate speech laws in general.

[-] ameancow@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It's an attempt to normalize the fear/hate of LGBTQ+ people on an international level. As long as the administration continues to constantly press this issue, much like the "mere exposure" advertising effect, it doesn't matter if people believe it nor not, the more times people hear a thing, the more likely they are to adopt that belief or feeling, even to a tiny degree.

That tiny degree, when continually pressed, when continually exposed, over large populations, influences a large number of people.

As long as they have an enemy group they can pin their problems on, they will keep going and keep ramping up the atrocities until we see mass graves. Again. (Seriously, how many times do we have to see mass graves in our nations before we decide that our leadership needs to be thrown down a well.)

If you guys care, please don't just rant on Lemmy or other internet spaces. Go talk to your family members. Talk to your friends. If you don't have friends, GO MAKE FRIENDS. GO MAKE ENEMIES. Our anti-social, paranoid, self-absorbed internet shut-in culture is making all of this tragedy possible.

Guys, you HAVE to push through those terrifying feelings of engaging with strangers. You HAVE to get social again. We don't win this behind keyboards.

[-] MonsterMonster@lemmy.world 72 points 1 month ago

The very Un-American US President Trump and his administration are trying to Americanise the rest of the world.

Fuck. Right. Off.

[-] Overconfidentiality 13 points 1 month ago

To "un-americanise" the rest of the world. Im still salty that some people genuinely think he's doing anything positive whatsoever.

[-] Randomgal@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 month ago

"Americanize" is not something positive, that's the point.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] adarza@lemmy.ca 70 points 1 month ago

“No free speech, no deal. It is as simple as that,”

did i warp into the onion without realizing?

[-] floofloof@lemmy.ca 25 points 1 month ago

Look at all that free speech the USA has, where people are being disappeared to an overseas concentration camp for saying genocide is wrong, or having the FBI investigate them for speaking critically about Trump, or imprisoned at the border for criticizing him online. Whereas in the UK, these days you get arrested and thrown in jail if you say you're English, don't you?

[-] nogooduser@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago

“No free speech, no deal. It is as simple as that,”

So he’s going to push this condition onto everyone that they deal with right? Saudi Arabia and Israel for example.

[-] ProvableGecko@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

Israel is USA, and SA can do whatever the fuck they want as long as they pay up (i.e. produce oil, buy weapons, whatever).

[-] MrMakabar@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 month ago

Putin needs Saudi Arabia to not start an oil price war, which Russia would loose.

The US support of Israel is making the US less popular around the world.

[-] aesthelete@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

This is the point of Trump dealing with the UK over the EU. They're more isolated since Brexit and therefore more easily intimidated.

Saudi Arabia and Israel both already have the type of freeze peach this fascist desires.

[-] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 16 points 1 month ago

Since January. Very oniony, but not very funny.

[-] TheLowestStone@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

Oniony in the sense that it makes me want to cry.

[-] PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@feddit.uk 3 points 1 month ago

He's got work to do on his side considering he's basically ignoring the 1st Amendment and deporting political critics

[-] kandoh@reddthat.com 69 points 1 month ago

Yeah they also told the UK they'd get a totally sweet trade deal if they did a Brexit, and that deal never materialized, did it?

Don't fall for their shit twice. That's America's problem - falling for it over and over again.

[-] Randomgal@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago

Where do you think they got it from?

[-] kandoh@reddthat.com 3 points 1 month ago

The English are indeed the dumbest of all the humans on the earth, I'm hoping the UK has enough welsh and scottish influences that they can steer the ship away from calamity

[-] JustJack23@slrpnk.net 51 points 1 month ago

We must throw our people under the bus, and that will allow us to lick some US boots!

[-] floofloof@lemmy.ca 24 points 1 month ago

Does anyone trust the UK government not to do this?

[-] Naich@lemmings.world 18 points 1 month ago

I'm expecting Starmer to fold like a cheap suit, especially with the court ruling yesterday.

[-] Twig@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 month ago

Could he individually have done anything about that court ruling?

[-] djsp@feddit.org 12 points 1 month ago

I think what @Naich@lemmings.world means is that the recent UK Supreme Court ruling gives some cover to Starmer, allowing him to pin some of the dissatisfaction with his eventual acquiescence to US pressure on the judiciary (even though Labour, being in control of the legislature, could fix the laws instead of washing their hands…).

[-] Naich@lemmings.world 4 points 1 month ago
[-] takeda@lemm.ee 48 points 1 month ago

IMO, everyone in UK should be protesting and demanding to rejoin EU. Russia successfully was able to make UK withdraw through disinformation, and this only made UK weaker.

[-] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Remember Cambridge Analitica, most of whose money came from wealthy Americans?

Maybe they were or maybe they weren't in cahoots with Russia, but sure as hell it was the very same members of the American "elites" who supported Trump's rise who also bought Brexit.

Britain's careless openness to American influence makes it easy for Americans to play it like a fiddle.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Jaysyn@lemmy.world 35 points 1 month ago

Or they could tell Trump to go fuck himself.

I like that idea better.

[-] Hegar@fedia.io 34 points 1 month ago

Destroying the transatlantic alliance is probably the main goal of putin's US regime.

Embolden the UK's right wing parties who are largely putinists or deliver yet another blow to transatlantic relations. Yet another example of trump delivering a win-win for putin that's a lose-lose for the US.

[-] wewbull@feddit.uk 30 points 1 month ago

I don't like the hate speech laws because I think they can be abused to include far too much, however NO LAW SHOULD BE CHANGED IN THE UK IN THE PERSUIT OF TRADE WITH THIS CUNT.

He can fuck right off.

[-] RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 month ago

The USA needs The UK more right now than the UK needs the USA

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] philpo@feddit.org 29 points 1 month ago

It's simply a power move to test out how submissive the UK government is

[-] Freshparsnip@lemm.ee 22 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Onion headline: Trump accuses China of DEI practices for having too many Chinese workers

[-] skhayfa@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago

So, UK has to become a US colony for trade access?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] KSPAtlas@sopuli.xyz 19 points 1 month ago

Being in Scotland, it hurts to think how close we were to being able to avoid this shit

[-] sicarius@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

It hurts so much. I hope the people who voted no are looking at what's happening and thinking "oops" I was wrong. But that's not likely.

[-] Freshparsnip@lemm.ee 17 points 1 month ago

He wants to turn the whole world into a fascist dictatorship

[-] Zier@fedia.io 16 points 1 month ago

The fucking jesus freaks are behind all the anti-diversity. They can fuck right off! What a sick fucking hate cult they are in.

[-] tal@lemmy.today 14 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

“No free speech, no deal. It is as simple as that,” the Washington source said.

Hmm. If that's correct, that's interesting. I wonder if similar criteria might apply to other countries to which he's talking on trade.

It looks like in the past few years, in the EU, there's been effort to require member states to prohibit hate speech. I'm not sure if that's gone through.

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9086657/

Criminalising Hate Crime and Hate Speech at EU Level: Extending the List of Eurocrimes Under Article 83(1) TFEU

In September 2020, President von der Leyen announced the Commission’s intention to propose to extend the list of EU crimes or Eurocrimes to all forms of hate crime and hate speech, as later reflected in the Commission Work Programme 2021.

In the US, member states may not prohibit hate speech; hate speech is not a legal concept here, and speech that might be classified as hate speech elsewhere is protected under the First Amendment.

EDIT: Though there is a related concept in the US of a "hate crime". A crime's sentence


and the crime itself cannot simply be engaging in speech


may be elevated if done when the motivation is hate against some protected groups. That is, the First Amendment would prohibit any form of government ban on saying saying "transexuals are abhorrent". But it is permissible in the US to pass a law to punish someone who physically assaults a transexual person, not merely for their assault, but also for performing assault with a specific motivation, if that motivation can be shown to be that the victim was transexual.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hate_crime_laws_in_the_United_States

Hate crime laws in the United States are state and federal laws which are intended to protect people from hate crimes (also known as bias crimes). While state laws vary, current statutes permit federal prosecution of hate crimes committed on the basis of a person's characteristics of race, religion, ethnicity, disability, nationality, gender, sexual orientation, and/or gender identity.

Forty-seven states and the District of Columbia have statutes criminalizing various types of bias-motivated violence or intimidation (the exceptions being Arkansas, South Carolina, and Wyoming).

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] KulunkelBoom@lemm.ee 12 points 1 month ago

Just once I'd like to hear a foreign country's avatar say "fuck yourself trump - right in your big shit smelling ass".

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] FaceDeer@fedia.io 11 points 1 month ago

I thought I was used to "WTF moments" when it came to America's sudden descent into madness, but here's one I wasn't prepared for. WTF?

[-] riodoro1@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

What the fuck are you doing uk!?

[-] Joeyfingis@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

What a useless fucking position for Trump to take. Pick your battles you orange buffoon. Gay folks can't hurt you, or won't. Just fix the economy.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 17 Apr 2025
363 points (100.0% liked)

World News

46784 readers
2017 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS