1218
That's my message (sopuli.xyz)

I cancelled my subscription since I received a notification that my browser is not supported. Perhaps I should have mentioned my issues with DRM as well, but this may have gone too far. One message is clear, too many messages are noise.

all 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 115 points 1 year ago

I wish Firefox didn't support DRM of any kind.

DRM is a mistake and shouldn't be considered a "web standard"

[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 100 points 1 year ago

I agree DRM sucks, but if Firefox didn't support it, even more people would flock to Chrome. You can disable it though.

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 12 points 1 year ago

Can you though? It still involves bundling non-free software that is basicly malware (software the harms the user)

[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 54 points 1 year ago

Yes, you can disable Firefox's DRM feature, which means DRM code will not run and you won't see DRM-protected content.

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 year ago

That doesn't completely remove it though

[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 50 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yes, disabling it doesn't remove it, but you can also remove it entirely if you want. Here are Mozilla's instructions (it's pretty easy). And here's Mozilla's post about implementing it, which also links to how to remove it. They supported completely opting out from day one, including opting out before Firefox has a chance to download the proprietary DRM code.

[-] Name@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 1 year ago
[-] msage@programming.dev 3 points 1 year ago

Gentoo~

Though you don't need it. I built my first Firefox on Ubuntu. It just felt better this way.

So I just installed Gentoo and I'm not going back. Holy hell how easy it is to ride that distro, and control flags what gets compiled in.

[-] lemann@lemmy.one 14 points 1 year ago

Firefox does not ship with the DRM module IIRC

It downloads it the first time you visit a website with DRM, after asking you first

[-] TrivialBetaState@sopuli.xyz 27 points 1 year ago

I agree but admit that I share some responsibility as DRM is optional and I choose to enable it for some sites. Quite often, when a site is less essential to me (or its DRM features) I decline them. The more we decline them, the more probable that there will be free alternatives of some services.

[-] eatham@aussie.zone 59 points 1 year ago

I doubt that they read those

[-] JJROKCZ@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

They’ll lose maybe a dozen people on Linux/Firefox and they know it. Not even a rounding error since chromium is near monopoly status

[-] eatham@aussie.zone 4 points 1 year ago

They won't even lose a dozen. Itidd be like 5 after the rest spoof their user agents

[-] Wakmrow@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

People for sure read them.

[-] DirkMcCallahan@lemmy.world 33 points 1 year ago

Good. Fuck 'em.

[-] tailiat@lemmy.ml 30 points 1 year ago

There are hundreds of us! HUNDREDS!

jk. As a current and longtime FF user I feel your pain.

I should probably do this kind of thing more often, but usually I just avoid bad services.

[-] kratoz29@lemm.ee 22 points 1 year ago
[-] speaker_hat@lemmy.one 19 points 1 year ago

👏👏👏

[-] mypasswordis1234@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

I'm proud of you, son

[-] gamey@feddit.rocks 16 points 1 year ago

Priracy for the win!

[-] BautAufWasEuchAufbaut 14 points 1 year ago

Often with stuff like this, it still works when you clean cache and set your user agent to Windows and Chrome.
Would be curious to see if it works, OP.

[-] TrivialBetaState@sopuli.xyz 42 points 1 year ago

The truth is that it mostly worked other than some issues with full screen but firefox has better ways around it. I really wanted to make the statement since I saw the notification that encouraged me to switch to another browser. Firefox is fully compliant and so should be their service. And should be DRM-free but that will be another discussion in the future.

[-] scrapeus@feddit.de 40 points 1 year ago

To be fair, I shouldn't have to hack my Client signature to recieve a paid service.

[-] BautAufWasEuchAufbaut 1 points 1 year ago

I agree 100%. I guess it's to not have to test more than one browser, and assuming most people will just switch free browsers.

[-] kibiz0r@midwest.social 9 points 1 year ago

Is it because of DRM, or reliance on experimental APIs?

[-] TrivialBetaState@sopuli.xyz 16 points 1 year ago

I think we should address this question to the site. Neither is acceptable though.

[-] Admin@tsck.org 8 points 1 year ago

I'm guessing it's completely compatible, I've had sites that show that and they've always worked fine after a useragent change. I have no idea why they'd say it doesn't work when I probably does, but I guess that's what you get when google rules everything

[-] stagen@feddit.dk 5 points 1 year ago

What’s this service? Some sort of streaming?

[-] Quintus@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago

It's a streaming service which's main purpose is to stream football matches I believe. It's quite popular in my country.

[-] axo@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago

GNU/Linux, cringe. Just say Linux, most tools that come with distros are not even GNU nowadays

[-] TrivialBetaState@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago

Either Linux or GNU/Linux is OK to me. It's the practice that makes the difference. While I mostly use Debian, which defines itself as GNU/Linux and I appreciate every aspect of it, I recognise that Arch Linux (which drops the GNU) has a much healthier approach to free software than Red Hat (recently at least), which defines itself as GNU/Linux but adds clauses to RHEL which are against the spirit of free software. I prefer using GNU/Linux because, as a statement, respects things that are important to me. Of course, I am totally cool with other people using any term they feel more comfortable with.

this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2023
1218 points (100.0% liked)

Firefox

17875 readers
5 users here now

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS