562
They targeted these medics. They targeted the world kitchen people. How much longer are those with the ability to do something gonna tolerate this?
Reminds me of a quote from Hogfather (1996):
Maybe someone said, hey, how’d you like to hunt this evil bastard of an eagle with his big sharp beak and great ripping talons, sort of thing, or how about instead you hunt this wren, which is basically about the size of a pea and goes “twit”? Go on, you choose.
Forever, unless they start attacking outside of Palestine no one is going to do anything. Especially since Isreal is one of the US' favorite murder toys
They have already launched attacks in Lebanon and Syria.
Did I say Palestine, I meant to say "the middle east".
How much longer are those with the ability to do something gonna tolerate this?
Until the costs to themselves outweigh the benefits. Otherwise why not tolerate it? Even the word tolerate implies that it bothers them beyond a minor PR issue. Normal people need to gain the ability to think like sociopaths if they want to understand them.
Tolerate? The "people with the ability to do something", by definition, would have done something if they wanted to. The powerful pursue their interests, just like everyone else. You can either get them to change their minds about what "the goal" is, or you change the people in power for some who align with the population. We should come up with a cool name for this crazy concept, like what if we used the Greek words for "people" and "power"‽
Youre right. That wasn’t the best phrased. Not “tolerate” …”actively encourage and not give a shit about”…
Fascists always lie. Zios are no exception.
Understanding that Zionists are fascists is probably the thing that let me understand why they do the things they do. The extent of their depravity, sometimes comical scheming, projection and of course all the damn lying make perfect sense when you realize that they're just Nazis with a Jewish makeover.
Zionazis, if you will
Edit: I hadn't heard this word before, but figured if I thought of it someone else beat me to it, and sure enough it's been around for a while. Turns out it's considered antisemitic, but I think if the jack boot fits...
I don't know whether this is too far or not, but do remember that all pro-zionists will call you anti-semitic for saying something anti-zionist.
"seems to contradict it"
come on. Why cant we all just admit they flat out lied to get away with a war crime, same as always.
Thing is even if they admitted it no-one would do anything about it. Why the wasted effort?
Just another day for Israel.
How nice. After it turns out Israel lied about executing 15 ambulance personell they can "walk back their statement".
Every fucking time evidence comes out of some incident, it completely contradicts what they said before.
I'm starting to think they might have a problem telling the truth.
Video evidence forcing a backtrack? Sounds like the truth only comes out when they’re caught red-handed.
The truth didn't even come out. It was "We will investigate ourselfs" type response. And the U.S. will continue supplying this state with the weapons to carry this out.
The reason they give for shooting ambulances is that Hamas has used ambulances to move soldiers.
"On December 19, 2024, soldiers from the 'Duvdevan' unit (Israeli military) took part in an operational mission to detain terrorists in Nablus. During the operation, an ambulance-like vehicle was used for operational purposes, without authorisation and without the relevant commanders' approval."
Sounds like the Israeli moved soldiers in ambulances, if you read your own quote.
I think your trying to show that Israeli military committed a war crime but you look like your accusing Hamas of doing the war crime. You got a edit that comment bruv, it's a mess.
Reading comprehension ain't for everyone
Edit just in case you think you read it right here sky news on the war crime https://news.sky.com/story/idf-admits-serious-offence-after-using-vehicle-marked-ambulance-in-raid-in-which-a-grandmother-was-killed-13288120
Reading comprehension.
Reading fucking comprehension.
I bring up the time IDF used an ambulance during a raid, that time they killed a grandma, in response to the IDF saying they shot these people because terrorists use ambulances... and people think I'm defending Israel.
Reading comprehension. Come on guys, say it with me. Reading comprehension!
The reason they give for shooting ambulances is that Hamas has used ambulances to move soldiers.
If you were calling Israel hypocrites you should have added something to the end of this sentence because it reads like you're saying Hamas did it and then attempted to provide an example. Text based sarcasm requires a bit more effort if you don't want to be misunderstood.
Lol what happened to people championing reading things carefully before commenting? At worst my wording was vague. Could've searched what I was talking about and easily realized was I thought. I assume people can search my comments and see I'm not defending Israel.
My dude, if people have to go away and read other things in order to understand what you were trying to communicate, then you did a bad job at communication.
I think I was in the minority, but I immediately understood what you were getting at. It made more sense that you were pointing out the IDF's hypocrisy, than trying to prove Hamas' guilt with woefully wrong evidence ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Come on bruv, they even literally say it's Israeli military
Half your thought is still in your head. When you read this to yourself, it sounds like what you intended to say. When everyone else reads it, we are still missing context.
The missing context is in the article. If people read it and remembered current events they too would find it utter bullshit that their excuse was "Enemy soldiers use ambulances." And then my comment would naturally follow.
If your post said what you wanted it to say, without missing a sentance explaining the part you kept in your head, people wouldn't have to "figure out" that you are saying the opposite of what it sounds like you are saying, because "you know" you would never say what it looks like you are saying.
You just need a second sentence about how it's hypocracy that they said that or something. The part that you know in your head, but didn't put "on paper".
It's like, in speaking, you could just emphasise the right syllables the right way and that string of text would read exactly how you intend it to. But in text, that doesn't work.
It's like putting down the lyrics to a song without the melody and expecting everyone to sing it the same way you hear it in your head. Only works if they already know the melody. There is no way for us to know your melody, so you instead can't write ambiguously. If you want other people to follow along.
I don't know if I should report this for obvious misinformation or leave it because it's hilarious.
Are you fucking stupid? I'm saying Israel kills people for using ambulances, and then bringing up the time Israel used an ambulance and killed a grandma.
Both your example and the one that mentions the grandmother are the same fucking incident.
Jfc.
Oh I get you now. I (and most of the rest of the thread) thought your comment was a weird hasbara thing with the quoted part as an example of evil khamas using ambulances.
this post was submitted on 06 Apr 2025
562 points (100.0% liked)
World News
46474 readers
1731 users here now
A community for discussing events around the World
Rules:
-
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
-
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
-
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
-
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
-
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
-
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
-
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
-
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
Lemmy World Partners
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
Recommendations
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
- Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS