1397

The idea feels like sci-fi because you're so used to it, imagining ads gone feels like asking to outlaw gravity. But humanity had been free of current forms of advertising for 99.9% of its existence. Word-of-mouth and community networks worked just fine. First-party websites and online communities would now improve on that.

The traditional argument pro-advertising—that it provides consumers with necessary information—hasn't been valid for decades.

(page 4) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Ultraviolet@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

How exactly do you define advertising? An overly broad definition would forbid, for example, a dentist from putting a sign in front of their office saying they're a dentist.

[-] Shayeta@feddit.org 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Paying somone else to advertise for you. You yourself holding up a sign promoting yourself is fine, paying someone else to hold up a sign for you is illegal.

[-] slappypantsgo@lemm.ee 4 points 6 months ago

Let’s ban all persuasive advertising! No reason not to let people make a list of features or something, like a notification, but that’s it.

[-] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

There were ads in ancient Rome, just to show how deep the rot goes.

[-] opsecisbasedonwhat@lemmy.ca 3 points 6 months ago

It's necessary for monopoly capitalism to induce demand. It's part of the planned economy.

[-] conicalscientist@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Those who take issue with loss of profits without ads must take it up with big tech. They've have literal trillions of dollars from dominating the ad industry. They have your money. Nobody else.

[-] Ibaudia@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

Advertising is too big of an industry to ever be banned. It also keeps lots of other sectors on life support, like sports and free online content. It's also extremely important to keep services like search engines free. Unless we transition away from capitalism ads are pretty much mandatory to keep the economy afloat. I agree they suck though. uBlock Origin until I die.

[-] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

I am kinda for it, but kinda against it because I like this 35% off coupon for weed in the bay area I get in the local ad magazine. I save so much fucking money with that coupon I love it

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] kwr112233@feddit.dk 3 points 6 months ago

Sure it should og course be legal to provide information, but banning ads is fine by me!

[-] turnip@lemm.ee 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I'd support a ban on advertising in public spaces, but in digital spaces its a bit nonsense given it funds a lot of things people then dont need to pay for.

[-] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 6 months ago
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] rebelflesh@lemm.ee 2 points 6 months ago

Guys, you wouldn’t find anything good if it wasn’t for good marketing you all got the attention span of a gold fish.

[-] dontbelasagne@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

That's not how it worked before advertising was even a thing. People still found good services and the better services got better word of mouth, all for free.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 06 Apr 2025
1397 points (100.0% liked)

Mildly Interesting

23255 readers
21 users here now

This is for strictly mildly interesting material. If it's too interesting, it doesn't belong. If it's not interesting, it doesn't belong.

This is obviously an objective criteria, so the mods are always right. Or maybe mildly right? Ahh.. what do we know?

Just post some stuff and don't spam.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS