29
submitted 3 weeks ago by yogthos@lemmy.ml to c/technology@lemmy.ml
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] finickydesert@lemmy.ml 10 points 3 weeks ago

Fallout vibes

[-] smee@poeng.link 3 points 3 weeks ago

I always wondered why there weren't any nuke batteries available. We have had the technology for decades.

[-] yogthos@lemmy.ml 7 points 3 weeks ago

I imagine large part of it is that it's at odds with capitalist drive to increase consumption.

[-] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 weeks ago

Planned obsolescence? Now in upgraded, more flashy version!

[-] deranger@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 weeks ago

Can’t imagine why we don’t put nuclear material in consumer products, seems practical.

[-] PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

You mean like Microwaves? Or Smoke detectors? Granite countertops etc. Or watches, and Energy Efficient CFLs?

[-] deranger@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

In smoke detectors and tritium watches the quantity of radioactive material is minuscule compared to the beta emitter in the battery, as in multiple orders of magnitude less. None of the things you mentioned have radioactive material in any significant quantity. If you swallowed or inhaled this battery you’d be exposed to significant amounts of radiation.

A microwave is not an ionizing radiation source.

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 weeks ago

I think you're in trouble if you swallow or inhale any batteries.

[-] DaPorkchop_@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 weeks ago

There is nothing nuclear about microwaves.

[-] PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 weeks ago

Sure, but they are radiation sources and beyond microwaves, "nuclear" material exists in several consumer products, so that isn't really a reason we haven't had consumer nuclear batteries.

[-] deranger@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

“Drinking hot tea is safe so drinking boiling water, which is also hot, should also be safe”

The quantity of radioactive material and what form of radiation it emits is extremely relevant to this discussion.

We have seen nuclear batteries - it’s decades old technology at this point. They were used in pacemakers. They stopped in the 80s because it’s too expensive and dangerous. You have to track radiation sources like this.

[-] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 weeks ago

They use a more efficient process. Something about a diamond semiconductor that turns beta particles into electricity instead of relying on heat.

[-] Kit 1 points 3 weeks ago

How long until they make a vibrator that fits these?

this post was submitted on 04 Apr 2025
29 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37737 readers
17 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS