1201
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 hours ago

Day 3,801 of thanking God I was born a Luddite

Anyone who thought their toilet would be improved by having an internet connection deserves this

[-] Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world 2 points 18 minutes ago

Sure but I'm also all for innovating and watching these things fail. Isn't there a value in letting dumb rich people with money waste their wealth on dumb ideas. It keeps them from doing things like buying Twitter

[-] Valmond@lemmy.world 6 points 2 hours ago

I'm kind of far away fyom being a luddite, senior software developer, codes for fun, builds electronic stuff with wifi etc.

My toilet was built and installed before internet was invented and will not be changed for anything smart, neither is my toaster, dish washer, stove, locks, etc. etc. Ever. Over my dead body (if you want to be disinherited).

[-] forkradiofact@lemm.ee 24 points 5 hours ago

Has nobody else pointed out this is clearly not real?

[-] Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world 1 points 17 minutes ago

Oh we're the idiots. Never saw that coming

[-] cass80@programming.dev 13 points 3 hours ago

Yeah first thing I did was search the web for more information. Zero results...

I bet most of these other commenters also complain about boomers eating up fake news.

[-] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 hours ago

I have become the red shirt from my favorite SMBC comic

However, my feelings regarding smart devices remain intact

[-] sirico@feddit.uk 8 points 4 hours ago

Home assistant everything is a yaml away

[-] kamen@lemmy.world 18 points 6 hours ago

Okay, I get the idea of smart AC for example - be elsewhere, turn it on remotely so that it's comfortable when you get home. Fine. But a toilet? You are physically present there, you can push a button to flush. Or are you telling me that you're shitting remotely now too?

[-] ameancow@lemmy.world 5 points 5 hours ago

Wait, so you're not subscribed to shitme™? For a low monthly subscription they send you a sealed, self-addressed and postage-paid container to deposit your feces in, it gets sent to a sorting facility and distributed via drones or delivery drivers directly to your home toilet, where the feces are flushed in the privacy and safety of your own home! The peace-of-mind alone is worth the $39.98 a month. Up until now, the only challenge has been flushing the toilet while you're still at the office, this way you NEVER have to go home!

[-] twice_hatch@midwest.social 2 points 4 hours ago

Shit like a world leader

[-] DerArzt@lemmy.world 6 points 5 hours ago

you're shitting remotely now too?

Do we tell them about the remote shit technology that just landed from Uranus?

[-] TeamAssimilation@infosec.pub 2 points 3 hours ago

It’s not that great anyway. Your local toilet will surreptitiously grab and analyze your poop, dispose of it so you don’t need to flush, and have the remote toilet extrude an identical copy someone else has to flush.

[-] TheHotze@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Hands free means you don't have to touch the handle with dirty hands, but you can do that with a motion sensor too.

[-] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 hours ago

Personally I would much rather touch my phone with my dirty hands than a toilet handle

[-] twice_hatch@midwest.social 7 points 4 hours ago

We've been ready for pedal activated toilets for decades now

[-] contrapunctus@lemmy.cafe 47 points 9 hours ago

The major difference between a thing that might go wrong and a thing that cannot possibly go wrong is that when a thing that cannot possibly go wrong goes wrong it usually turns out to be impossible to get at and repair.

Douglas Adams

[-] Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee 4 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Adams's law.

[-] the_riviera_kid@lemmy.world 10 points 7 hours ago

And yet I hear dumbshits bragging all time about how alexa controls my (insert thing that definitely does not need automation here).

These sort of people never think beyond tomorrow and it shows.

[-] prole 27 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Why would you ever get a toilet that requires anything but the laws of physics to operate?

[-] Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee 3 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

I can see some purpose in having a 'smart' toilet for monitoring health. Your pee and poo can have some value in seeing if there anything that needs to be dealt with medically. But even that is difficult to do. For one thing, it must still function ad a toilet first before anything. Meaning it uses the simple mechanical flushing and refilling and stopping when it is sufficiently full.

However for this the analysis and storage of data must be 100% at the user's control. If they want it gone. It is gone. Irrecoverable. Any update must be done via USB or other connection. No wifi or internet.

And even then the analysis can be off for obvious reasons. People need to scrub their toilets and some keep it clean by having one of those pucks in the tank that sanitize the water. All of these can interfere with any results out of a medical setting.

[-] ace_of_based@sh.itjust.works 5 points 6 hours ago

You're already @ the mf toilet too, or the sink. what is even the purported purpose of remotely activating something you have to stand there to use?

[-] LastYearsIrritant@sopuli.xyz 10 points 9 hours ago

I mean... Electronics and the Internet are also following the laws of physics. But I get what you mean, levers should be the only activation, and gravity should be the only requirement.

That being said, electronics in our devices do tend to reduce the amount of water and power that appliances use. Dumb devices are extremely inefficient, even though there are fewer points of failure.

It sucks that a 1950's fridge can still function just fine today, but it also is a bigger strain on the power grid, and a leak in the refrigerant would destroy the ozone.

[-] sugarfoot00@lemmy.ca 4 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

> That being said, electronics in our devices do tend to reduce the amount of water and power that appliances use. Dumb devices are extremely inefficient, even though there are fewer points of failure.

I fail to see how electronics in these (unpowered) devices in any way reduce the amount of power that they use.

[-] 1D10@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago

In theory you could have a system that monitors input and then uses a precise amount of water to vacate the bowl.

[-] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago

Oh sick, a toilet with bowl cameras

[-] Ironfacebuster@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

I think that was just a general statement regarding old devices, since they brought up a 1950s refrigerator as an example of a powered "dumb" device

[-] Natanael@infosec.pub 1 points 6 hours ago

Sprinklers and all kinds of stuff are more efficient with sensors and electronic regulators

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Th3D3k0y@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago

My new eFirepit is causing my family to die of hypothermia.

[-] NeilBru@lemmy.world 11 points 11 hours ago

"Dumb" is the new "smart".

[-] raman_klogius@ani.social 17 points 13 hours ago

Terminally online, even for #2

[-] TeamAssimilation@infosec.pub 3 points 3 hours ago

Because most people are not online while pooping, right?

Right?

[-] Hupf@feddit.org 39 points 16 hours ago
[-] GratefullyGodless@lemmy.world 10 points 13 hours ago
[-] SGG@lemmy.world 47 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

I've put a few smart lights/switches/sensors/power points in at home. Definitely helps mum as we can have wireless switches for the lights, and motion sensors to turn the hallway lights on automatically as well.

For ALL of them, I make sure there is a manual control that will work as a backup regardless. Even if a smart light is "off" due to the motion sensor not detecting movement, all you need to do is turn the old regular light switch off then back on and the light will default to being back on.

[-] JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz 5 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Ye. I have all Ikea smart stuff, by default everything is running a local mesh network with physical remotes and that light switch backup.

You don't even need to connect any of it to the net, buying a hub to get app & google home/alexa/etc control is entirely optional with the exception of a few sensors, like the moisture/water leak one. And even then, the app & hub work on local wifi with no internet anyway.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 02 Apr 2025
1201 points (100.0% liked)

Programmer Humor

22187 readers
1550 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS