496
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Reygle@lemmy.world 30 points 6 days ago

Holy shit, Canon convinced you to install a mobile app? Who's holding the gun to your head? We'll dispatch authorities as soon as possible.

[-] mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 5 days ago

Looks they failed to implement "open in default browset" and used "open in chrome" instead. Or maybe it has a stupid check if chrome is installed before opening link externally to avoid problems

[-] OhioComrade@lemmy.ml 22 points 6 days ago

Welcome to the browser wars. This has been going on a long time now.

Browser Wars

[-] CrackedLinuxISO@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

If it's trying to talk to a device over Bluetooth or USB, it's not supported in Firefox. Mozilla refuses to implement WebUSB because they think the danger of letting people accidentally flash malware onto a physical device outweighs the benefits.

[-] mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 5 days ago

But this is just for sign in right? Its a fking native app

[-] CrackedLinuxISO@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

It's probably using WebView, or whatever it's called where an android app brings up a browser window. If you have Firefox as your default web browser, apps will use it instead of chrome. It's usually pretty nice, because if you have adblock in Firefox you also get adblock in the app.

It's possible that the sign-in webpage wants to talk to the camera before returning control to the app.

[-] L0rdMathias@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 days ago

To build off this comment; it's likely the result of careless design. It is possible to code applications to avoid this issue, but it is technically a Firefox specific issues so it's not something a mobile developer would default to consider.

[-] mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 5 days ago

I guess you are talking about the in app browser thing and not the webview. I just don't get sign in requiring communication to the camera. Its things you usually do after signing in. But idk maybe a weird implementation

[-] Obi@sopuli.xyz 2 points 6 days ago

Yeah this is the remote shooting app, for camera control, it'll use Bluetooth to establish connection with the camera and then switch to WiFi for live view.

[-] Mwa@lemm.ee 1 points 5 days ago

Why not use android open in feature

[-] Jehuty@lemmy.ml 91 points 1 week ago

SO many corporate/govt websites do this. My health insurance and credit card company do it. It's mind boggling. I always keep some variation of Chromium installed to deal with it and then go back to LibreWolf.

[-] egrets@lemmy.world 71 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I've not used LibreWolf, but assuming that Firefox addons are generally compatible, it might be worth trying Chrome Mask. It's made by a Mozilla employee.

[-] Jehuty@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 week ago

I will give this a shot!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] sasquash@sopuli.xyz 78 points 1 week ago

always give a bad rating and if possible create a support request. let them know.

[-] cheers_queers@lemm.ee 70 points 1 week ago

I just downloaded firefox focus, and etsy wont let me log in with it because it has adblocking. even to track a shipment. They even stopped putting the tracking number in the shipment email so i cant go directly to usps. Im sick of being railroaded into giving up my privacy.

[-] frostysauce@lemmy.world 10 points 6 days ago

Time to stop shopping on Etsy.

[-] GenosseFlosse@feddit.org 7 points 6 days ago

It's overrun with drop shippers anyway...

[-] cheers_queers@lemm.ee 4 points 6 days ago

Yeah it just sucks because i use it to support small business :/

[-] CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world 35 points 1 week ago

I have an very long blacklist of companies for this reason.

The problem with standing up for your privacy is that it massively diminishes the resources available to you. I'm down to shopping at Costco as a single adult, because I had to say fuck you to Target recently, and my local grocery store was busy doing anti-union bullshit at the same time. So I'm driving further and probably paying more in the long run.

But they aren't principles if you don't have to give something up to stick by them.

[-] cupcakezealot 52 points 1 week ago

because they're too lazy to program around custom chrome tabs

[-] IceFoxX@lemm.ee 35 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Chrome on Android = system App
Why Chrome = more Tracking Tracking Tracking

Its all about Tracking

[-] mj_marathon@programming.dev 1 points 6 days ago

Chrome is not a system app on android.

[-] IceFoxX@lemm.ee 9 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Webview is a system app + Chrome itself. You need root otherwise you can just remove Updates and deactivating

To more or less avoid the problems mentioned here you can replace webview with Mulch and Mulch Browser (chromiun based) but requires root

[-] ewenak@jlai.lu 1 points 6 days ago

Isn't Mulch not maintained anymore, as it was maintained by DivestOS, which has shutdown?

[-] IceFoxX@lemm.ee 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

https://github.com/Magisk-Modules-Alt-Repo/open_webview?tab=readme-ov-file Updated 3 month ago. Anyway its not the only aviable solution

[-] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 3 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Maybe not, but it is a default app, and the vast majority of people can't be bothered to install something better.

[-] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 49 points 1 week ago

Chrome is the new Internet explorer. (Literally I guess)

[-] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 37 points 1 week ago

Give them a one star and let them know why

[-] alfredon996@feddit.it 31 points 1 week ago

Have you tried changing the user agent ? You need an extension for that

[-] s08nlql9@lemm.ee 54 points 1 week ago

This is a native Android app from Canon (not a webpage) requiring to open Chrome instead of my default Firefox app.

[-] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 56 points 1 week ago

Apps are rarely native these days. Everything is a fucking webview.

If this was a web view they wouldn’t even need this screen since it could just done in the “app” itself instead of needing to open an external browser.

If this was a web view they wouldn’t even need this screen since it could just done in the “app” itself instead of needing to open an external browser.

[-] Feyd@programming.dev 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Does it communicate via usb with the camera? If so it is probably because it uses webusb which is not implemented in Firefox https://caniuse.com/?search=webusb

[-] alfredon996@feddit.it 6 points 1 week ago

I understand, but if the application opens the browser you have to make it believe that it is opening Chrome

[-] mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

@s08nlql9@lemm.ee try making a dummy app with com.google.chrome(not sure) as package name and login again. Maybe the browser check get bypassed and it opens in the default browser.

[-] alfredon996@feddit.it 1 points 5 days ago

For that you need a ROM that supports signature spoofing, but it should be possible, just not for the common user, sadly

[-] mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 5 days ago

I don't think that app check signature or so. Its probably checking if app exist or not. Except if the app launches chrome by its indent action instead of normal link opening method

[-] Ziglin@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

Checking the signature seems like it would be good practice. But that doesn't mean that they do.

[-] ewenak@jlai.lu 3 points 6 days ago

But you can't make a native app think it is opening Chrome when it's opening Firefox with just an extension. The extension only changes things inside the browser, but the Canon app probably checks the app ID of the browser it's opening, which is done at the level of the Android system, and which is not affected by the extension.

[-] ulterno@programming.dev 2 points 6 days ago

... which can only be fixed after rooting the phone.

[-] SouthFresh@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago

Because they get more data from it.

[-] gagootron@feddit.org 21 points 1 week ago

That reminds me of PayPal. I can't use my hardware sevurity key to log in on mobile... Unless I enable desktop mode in firefox. Then it works

[-] longjohnjohnson@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 week ago

Typically they have a dependency on something only one browser can do, and rather than using a polyfill or a better browser, force their bad technical decisions onto the user.

[-] ewenak@jlai.lu 3 points 6 days ago

To be fair some things can't be polyfilled, like the WebUSB API, as someone mentioned in the comments. But lots of the sites could fix their code so it works on Firefox, yeah.

[-] metallic_substance@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

Because 💲

[-] Moonrise2473@feddit.it 5 points 1 week ago

Revolut business is the same. Somehow you must have chrome on mobile if you want to send a bank transfer from desktop. (It opens a qr code that when scanned, only works with Google Chrome and not any other chromium browser)

[-] ohellidk@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago

Maybe it'll accept brave browser? Not that I'd use that browser as my daily...

this post was submitted on 01 Apr 2025
496 points (100.0% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

38841 readers
257 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating.

-The Community !actuallyinfuriating has been born so that's where you should post the big stuff.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS