168
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Maeve@kbin.earth 2 points 2 days ago

Ok that's enough social media for today. Sigh

[-] ProfHillbilly@lemmy.world 24 points 5 days ago

What the actual fuck. They never learn.

[-] Mr_Canard@jlai.lu 26 points 5 days ago

Never get tired of losing

[-] zenpocalypse@lemm.ee 58 points 5 days ago

I like Harris just fine and she would have been a far better president than Donnie, but this is how JD Vance becomes President.

[-] kreskin@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Cant we find someone who is not in favor of war crimes to run from the left? How about Buttigieg

[-] zenpocalypse@lemm.ee 2 points 2 days ago

I'd be all in on that.

[-] Manalith@midwest.social 7 points 5 days ago

Bold to assume Trump 3 doesn't happen.

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 41 points 5 days ago

So, they prove once again that they don't learn.

[-] jpreston2005@lemmy.world 115 points 6 days ago

Are you fucking kidding me.

AOC and Bernie over here amassing entire legions of working class people and they're over here bashing themselves in the nuts. doing a straw poll with corporate doners pretending like it means fucking ANYTHING.

GODAMNIT THESE FUCKING DEMOCRATS ARE FUCKING MORONS.

[-] OminousOrange@lemmy.ca 11 points 6 days ago

Perhaps time for a third party...

[-] Katherine1@midwest.social 7 points 5 days ago

The problem is that I don't know how you'd get a third party off the ground. Modern third parties all seem to fall into the trap of going all in on a presidential at the expense of any potential down ballot races.

I think Bernie's suggestion of progressives running as independent is an interesting angle as it would be focused on down ballot races by its nature, and if you get enough independent progressives, they could coalesce into a new party down the line.

[-] OminousOrange@lemmy.ca 6 points 5 days ago

There's also the blockade that both established parties put up, as they very much enjoy their exclusive duopoly.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] aseriesoftubes@lemmy.world 131 points 6 days ago

We still have three years to go before the next election, assuming one actually happens.

At this stage in the game, the only thing that these types of polls are going to reveal is who has the most name recognition.

In other words, everyone calm down.

[-] CarnivorousCouch@lemmy.world 26 points 6 days ago

Thank you! Any time this kind of polling shows up on Lemmy, users seem to think this is the Plan of the Democratic Leadership Cabal, rather than an incredibly premature name recognition test.

People want to vote for people they have favorable impressions of who they also think others will vote for. Without other frontrunners, who emerge over time, it's not surprising that polled Democrats would recognize and still support the candidate that 75 million people voted for five months ago.

If you want other candidates (I do), identify them and figure out how to help them build their profile now.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] exploitedamerican@lemm.ee 31 points 5 days ago

Mmore proof the neo liberal democratic party is a controlled opposition party who bows to the will of the same Wall Street military and prison industry profiteers that guide the policies of the right. Trump is going to be handed another 4 years after they repeal the 22nd amendment. this country is a fascist hellscape

[-] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 111 points 6 days ago

fucking morons.

people demanding progressives, but no, lets pretend conservative democrats have a fucking chance.

how tone-deaf can you fucking be.

[-] oxysis@lemm.ee 50 points 6 days ago

Considering the Democratic Party has done this 3 times in a row and that they refuse to primary wildly unpopular members of their own party.

They are extremely tone deaf and out of touch with what the voters want. It’s why I want the progressives in the party to split off. The progressives are screwed if they stay, so why not leave and have an actual fucking chance?

Bernie Sanders got screwed over by the super delegates who all went for unpopular Hillary Clinton. Imagine how wildly different things would be if he was the Democratic nominee in 2016?

[-] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 22 points 6 days ago

agreed. we have assholes like obama and bill clinton also to blame for sinking bernie in 2016.

they are 100% part of why trump is president right now.

[-] baronvonj@lemmy.world 14 points 6 days ago

Considering the Democratic Party has done this 3 times in a row and that they refuse to primary wildly unpopular members of their own party.

The primaries are open to anybody who meets the requirements. We don't have to wait for "the party" to provide us with better candidates. The better candidates just have to follow the process to declare themselves a candidate. And then we just have to show up and vote for them.

Bernie Sanders got screwed over by the super delegates who all went for unpopular Hillary Clinton.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superdelegate#2016_election

Sanders initially said that the candidate with the majority of pledged delegates should be the nominee; in May 2016, after falling behind in the elected delegate count, he shifted, pushed for a contested convention and arguing that, "The responsibility that superdelegates have is to decide what is best for this country and what is best for the Democratic Party."[46][54] Ultimately, Clinton won the nomination without relying on the votes of superdelegates; she led Sanders by a substantial number of elected delegates (from primary and caucus votes), as well by a substantial margin in the popular vote.

Also at the top of that page:

In 2018, the Democratic National Committee reduced the influence of superdelegates by barring them from voting on the first ballot at the Democratic National Convention, allowing them to vote only in a contested convention.

Imagine how wildly different things would be if he was the Democratic nominee in 2016?

It's sad to think about how much better things could have been, and also if we had had Gore in 2000. But we shouldn't forget that Clinton won the primaries popular vote by enough that the superdelegates' votes didn't matter.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] TheDeadlySquid@lemm.ee 23 points 5 days ago

Please don’t.

[-] Wilco@lemm.ee 38 points 6 days ago

No we fucking didn't. She can't win a primary against sanders.

[-] raynethackery@lemmy.world 10 points 5 days ago

Bernie Sanders is 83. He won't be running in the Presidential primaries.

[-] TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works 9 points 5 days ago

I'd trust Bernie at 95 wayyyy more than trump at any age

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Redditsux@lemmy.world 79 points 6 days ago

Good god please no. Not again.

[-] something_random_tho@lemmy.world 61 points 6 days ago

Dems right now.

Goofy meme I’ll fucking do it again

[-] dirthawker0@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago

Who?

Seriously. I haven't seen a word from her since she lost. Meanwhile, Elizabeth Warren, Katie Porter, and of course AOC are posting and speaking publicly every day. Katie's running for governor of California and I will give her my vote when the time comes.

The DNC clearly has its head up somewhere dark and damp. Harris's campaign went flat as soon as they got involved.

[-] crystalmerchant@lemmy.world 24 points 5 days ago

What the fuckkkkk

[-] halferect@lemmy.world 18 points 5 days ago

no just no no no please god no

[-] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 51 points 6 days ago

Jfc. They'll never learn. We really are all doomed.

Just kidding. We were doomed already.

[-] jimmy90@lemmy.world 9 points 5 days ago
[-] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 6 days ago

Here's an idea, maybe field a compelling candidate who can beat Trump?

Crazy I know. I just don't know where it comes from sometimes.

[-] Cyclist@lemmy.world 14 points 6 days ago

If Trump is allowed to run again so is Obama. Not sure how everyone feels about that.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Hotspur@lemmy.ml 25 points 6 days ago

A.) this is a joke right? B.) amusing they think there’s gonna be a viable election in 2028

[-] Skyrmir@lemmy.world 37 points 6 days ago

Honestly I don't think she should run in 28. Nothing against Kamala, but we really don't need a moderate centrist insider to bring us back from the damage Trump is doing. The nation would be far better off having a real debate with Pete, Tim, and Alexandria up on stage. Kamala would have too much power over the process, and would use every bit of it. Which of course means that's exactly what's going to happen, probably handing us a narrow loss to fucking Don Jr. or some other moron puppet.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 23 points 6 days ago

Democrats love fucking losing.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] demizerone@lemmy.world 20 points 6 days ago

This is why repubs don't have to cheat to win. Democrats will it into existence.

[-] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago

Please understand that they still will cheat if they can, because it's more fun for them that way

[-] thedeadwalking4242@lemmy.world 23 points 6 days ago

I swear to god if they pull this nonsense again…

[-] Alwaysnownevernotme@lemmy.world 19 points 6 days ago
[-] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 6 days ago

Can't wait until she loses again to the same dipshit moron she lost to and we're blamed again for her horrid policy campaign, again.

[-] wolfpack86@lemmy.world 24 points 6 days ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] not_that_guy05@lemmy.world 28 points 6 days ago

Why? Jfc just learn for once.

[-] themadcodger@kbin.earth 16 points 6 days ago
[-] eran_morad@lemmy.world 18 points 6 days ago

She needs to fuck off. Permanently.

[-] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 27 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

It's funny how libs think republicans are the only stupid "party".

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] missingno@fedia.io 22 points 6 days ago

Things the DNC has learned:

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] _lilith@lemmy.world 10 points 6 days ago

Fuck off loser

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2025
168 points (100.0% liked)

politics

22365 readers
3437 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS