112
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 20 points 4 months ago

Made by a rockstar dev who also created bat.

[-] wwwgem@lemmy.ml 16 points 4 months ago
[-] Xanza@lemm.ee 11 points 4 months ago

fd is in all of my environments.

[-] lemmeBe@sh.itjust.works 7 points 4 months ago

Recently discovered Television.

[-] Goun@lemmy.ml 7 points 4 months ago

Another MIT licensed rust copycat.. I rather stick to GNU, but thanks.

[-] pastermil@sh.itjust.works 6 points 4 months ago

Also a great way to confuse a command with a floppy disk drive.

[-] deadcatbounce@reddthat.com 5 points 4 months ago

I have always hated 'find' with the non-standard options. Basic RegEx is easy to use and fd became a firm favourite from the off.

[-] some@programming.dev 2 points 4 months ago

This is a case where both tools are invaluable.

The original find has much more comprehensive options. Of course it is extensively documented and you can find all kinds of information online about how it works and how to combine it with other tools to accomplish all kinds of tasks. And it's GPL which is always preferable.

fd has a narrower range of functionality but goddamned it really is faster. fd can run several searches on the whole hard drive's contents while find is struggling to get through just a single comparable search on the same set of files. For simple tasks, the cli usage for fd is less to remember and less to type.

If I had to choose, I'd stick with find because it can do everything, even if it's slower and more cumbersome. But luckily, don't have to choose, just have both and use them as appropriate.

this post was submitted on 20 Mar 2025
112 points (100.0% liked)

Open Source

39404 readers
487 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS