Why is it an MIT project in the first place?
It’s not really something developers want to think about very much so they often just use the default.
Do you think it was intentional ideological decision by the Rust developers or some other contributors/interests to make permissive the default? Or a random decision that has ended up being consequential because of the popularity of Rust?
I have noticed for a long time that github promotes MIT license. It lets you use any, of course, but puts a real positive shine on MIT. My perception is that this is a purposeful intervention by MS into FLOSS to promote MIT.
Yes you are correct I mis-used the term. I mean copyleft. So I fixed the post. :)
soo you are saying people are tricked into it?
Over the years, forums did not really get smaller, so much as the rest of the internet just got bigger.
pipeline to fascism
There are so many niche forums.
Here's one I found a while ago when I was looking at repairing an old electric fan I found: Antique Fan Collector's Forum.
In the way that people would always add "reddit" to their searches, try just adding "forum".
I felt the same way every time I tried to use Twitter as I feel every time I try to use Mastodon. It's either way too much or way too little. I prefer everything about the reddit/lemmy/threadiverse style.
How would we even be having this conversation on microblogging? A bunch of reposts, with or without comments, disconnected from each other... So much nicer to have a "subject" line and a page where every relevant comment is presented.
Can you imagine if the threadiverse was sorted that way? It would be insane and essentially unusable at scale
On lemmy there is a way to basically do this by toggling the filters at the top of the top of the front page. You can see how this looks form my instance: https://programming.dev/?dataType=Comment&listingType=All&sort=New
I've always assumed nobody every uses it like that. I guess if you were bored you might get lucky and see something that interested you, at least if it was limited to Local and you were on a good instance.
mumble is already the name of FLOSS voip software so they're probably better off with the existing name. Which I don't love on first glance but there's probably some rationale for it.
This is a case where both tools are invaluable.
The original find
has much more comprehensive options. Of course it is extensively documented and you can find all kinds of information online about how it works and how to combine it with other tools to accomplish all kinds of tasks. And it's GPL which is always preferable.
fd
has a narrower range of functionality but goddamned it really is faster. fd
can run several searches on the whole hard drive's contents while find
is struggling to get through just a single comparable search on the same set of files. For simple tasks, the cli usage for fd
is less to remember and less to type.
If I had to choose, I'd stick with find
because it can do everything, even if it's slower and more cumbersome. But luckily, don't have to choose, just have both and use them as appropriate.
That's a very nuanced analysis. I've explained it this way especially to people who describe themselves as "bad at computers". Hey, give yourself a break, you've learned a lot about how to cope with windows. But this investment leads to a conservatism--- they dont want to learn coping skills o a new system. The devil you know.
I'd just add that GUI is more discoverable. When faced with a terminal, what to do? Whereas with a GUI you have a menubar, some icons etc. The GUI gives a lot more hints.
In the terminal (which I love) it is more powerful once you know how to crack the lid.