818
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] slaacaa@lemmy.world 33 points 3 hours ago
[-] ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world 54 points 4 hours ago

Problem with setting Teslas on fire is we can't know if it's an act of protest or if they just did that on their own.

[-] melpomenesclevage@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 28 minutes ago

I was JUST about to say; how do we know they didn't just do that? or that this wasn't a buggy firmware update that just did that? or a malicious firmware update that did this?

[-] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 7 points 2 hours ago
[-] ragingdachshund@lemm.ee 30 points 5 hours ago

Oh no. Anyways.

[-] cupcakezealot 61 points 10 hours ago

if you know anything about who did it no you don't

[-] VanillaFrosty@lemmy.world 1 points 10 minutes ago

The engineers did this, Teslas just kind of do this.

[-] cynar@lemmy.world 23 points 3 hours ago

It's obviously the MAGA crowd. They've spent years complaining about electric vehicles. They've just escalated that to burning them out. The police need to go have a nice chat with the rolling coal types.

[-] slaneesh_is_right@lemmy.org 22 points 6 hours ago

Probably god's will or something. What's the pont of investigating.

[-] Curmudge_john@lazysoci.al 85 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

We know that Teslas sometimes just catch fire on their own.

We also know that sometimes Tesla drivers will set their cars on fire themselves on purpose. Because of that...

We also know that Elon has a backdoor into all Teslas.

Now ask yourself which is more likely, the woke liberal crybabies actually causing violence or a drug addled and politically embattled CEO of a company that lost 50% of its value in the past 3 months creating a false flag to villainize the left and get insurance to cover damage to the vehicles he can't sell?

/s (kind of)

[-] slaneesh_is_right@lemmy.org 14 points 6 hours ago

If unsold teslas catch fire, i'm convinced it's some insurance scam. A car sold and a car gone that they can't fix anyway

[-] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 6 points 1 hour ago

They've already shown what they are capable of, in terms of scam behavior, up in Canada.

[-] Nindelofocho@lemmy.world 51 points 11 hours ago

Didnt the Nazi party burn down the Reichstag and blame it on the other party?

[-] smiletolerantly@awful.systems 17 points 8 hours ago

They blamed it on the communist party, yes. There were 8 parties represented in the Reichstag at the time though.

[-] Nindelofocho@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

Thank you. My history has unfortunately become a bit rusty

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] rational_lib@lemmy.world 18 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Don't destroy Tesla cars, destroy the brand. Destroying Teslas means there's fewer Teslas and that makes them more valuable/reduces the flooding of the market caused by people selling their cars. The goal is to annihilate Elon's purchasing power to stop him from using it to implementing fascist governments around the world.

[-] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 minutes ago

Tesla has much higher output than the number of vehicles that spontaneously combust. So the supply shortage you envision won't occur unless cars light up by the hundreds or thousands a day. And that's before accounting for all the extra slack in production created by decreasing demand around the world.

Teslas combusting damages the brand. It's a material risk of owning a Tesla. It would also mean higher insurance. In fact beyond some combustion threshold, Teslas would become uninsurable. Therefore Teslas on fire directly contributes to decreasing Elon's purchase power.

[-] potatopotato@sh.itjust.works 46 points 8 hours ago

In fairness, I think the possibility that someone might light your car on fire is a stronger incentive to not buy a brand than internet posts making fun of the brand. It also means now they have to beef up security at all of the dealerships. Car sales are surprisingly impulse driven, hence the famous high pressure sales tactics, so it'll be harder to get people in the door if they're strip searching everyone and if they can't have as much inventory on the lot, customers can't drive home with the options they want so less impulse buying. Also full coverage insurance, required for financing, will get more expensive or even impossible to obtain which possibly means a massively decreased customer pool.

I think a better counter argument is the environmental damage caused by lighting all the cancer boxes on fire.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2025
818 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

66892 readers
4509 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS