575
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] ragingdachshund@lemm.ee 1 points 49 seconds ago

Oh no. Anyways.

[-] cupcakezealot 19 points 4 hours ago

if you know anything about who did it no you don't

[-] slaneesh_is_right@lemmy.org 5 points 1 hour ago

Probably god's will or something. What's the pont of investigating.

[-] rational_lib@lemmy.world 10 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Don't destroy Tesla cars, destroy the brand. Destroying Teslas means there's fewer Teslas and that makes them more valuable/reduces the flooding of the market caused by people selling their cars. The goal is to annihilate Elon's purchasing power to stop him from using it to implementing fascist governments around the world.

[-] potatopotato@sh.itjust.works 22 points 3 hours ago

In fairness, I think the possibility that someone might light your car on fire is a stronger incentive to not buy a brand than internet posts making fun of the brand. It also means now they have to beef up security at all of the dealerships. Car sales are surprisingly impulse driven, hence the famous high pressure sales tactics, so it'll be harder to get people in the door if they're strip searching everyone and if they can't have as much inventory on the lot, customers can't drive home with the options they want so less impulse buying. Also full coverage insurance, required for financing, will get more expensive or even impossible to obtain which possibly means a massively decreased customer pool.

I think a better counter argument is the environmental damage caused by lighting all the cancer boxes on fire.

[-] kameecoding@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Do teslas even have options? Isn't it just the battery pack and awd/rwd and then performance

[-] Curmudge_john@lazysoci.al 36 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

We know that Teslas sometimes just catch fire on their own.

We also know that sometimes Tesla drivers will set their cars on fire themselves on purpose. Because of that...

We also know that Elon has a backdoor into all Teslas.

Now ask yourself which is more likely, the woke liberal crybabies actually causing violence or a drug addled and politically embattled CEO of a company that lost 50% of its value in the past 3 months creating a false flag to villainize the left and get insurance to cover damage to the vehicles he can't sell?

/s (kind of)

[-] slaneesh_is_right@lemmy.org 1 points 1 hour ago

If unsold teslas catch fire, i'm convinced it's some insurance scam. A car sold and a car gone that they can't fix anyway

[-] techclothes@lemmy.world 6 points 4 hours ago

Given Elons history, it's definitely possible.

[-] Nindelofocho@lemmy.world 22 points 6 hours ago

Didnt the Nazi party burn down the Reichstag and blame it on the other party?

[-] smiletolerantly@awful.systems 3 points 3 hours ago

They blamed it on the communist party, yes. There were 8 parties represented in the Reichstag at the time though.

[-] kandoh@reddthat.com 39 points 6 hours ago

Insurance fraud due to slow sales

[-] pyre@lemmy.world 6 points 4 hours ago

perfect. let's see if all tesla dealerships do it

[-] dmention7@lemm.ee 15 points 6 hours ago

Man, if I had the poor luck/foresight to have purchased a Tesla earlier, I would be driving like the politest mofo in existence these days.

[-] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 5 points 5 hours ago

I'd set it on fire and make an insurance claim.

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 3 points 4 hours ago

Those damn leftists!

[-] jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works 151 points 9 hours ago

In posts on X following the incident, Tesla CEO Elon Musk called the incidents “terrorism” and said the company “just makes electric cars and has done nothing to deserve these evil attacks.”

OK buddy.

[-] samus12345@lemm.ee 58 points 8 hours ago

The cars suck, but he's right that the company hasn't done anything to deserve this. He's the one who chose to make himself the face of Tesla, though, so however people feel about him, they'll feel about any business he owns.

Terrorism, though? Hardly. It's protest. He's the one doing terrorism by dismantling the government.

[-] slaneesh_is_right@lemmy.org 1 points 1 hour ago

This is terrorism. Storming the capitol is clearly not.

[-] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 13 points 6 hours ago

The cars are poorly designed to the point of being dangerous. They deserve it a little.

[-] Ulrich@feddit.org 29 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Terrorism, though? Hardly.

Violent, criminal acts committed by individuals and/or groups to further ideological goals stemming from domestic influences, such as those of a political, religious, social, racial, or environmental nature

Pretty much the definition of terrorism. Doesn't necessarily make it wrong.

That's what was so terrifying about the Patriot Act for so long.

[-] Initiateofthevoid@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 7 hours ago

Violent, criminal acts

Property damage is not violence and nonviolent protests are not terrorism. They will claim it is. They are lying.

[-] kofe@lemmy.world 6 points 4 hours ago

Gonna disagree with the anarchist viewpoint because physical damage to inanimate objects can still cause PTSD, battered spouse syndrome with enough incidents over time, etc. It's the threat of danger that matters.

Just because it doesn't fit your ideological view doesn't mean people are lying by looking at it differently

[-] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 1 points 27 minutes ago* (last edited 26 minutes ago)

Yep the idea of terrorism bad is honestly kinda overly simple. Can it be bad? Sure especially if you don't have a specific target but well the IRA, American Revolutionaries, and Zapatistas have shown that there is a good way to go about it. The term of the day is damage minimization.

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.world 5 points 5 hours ago

Not sure why some people are disagreeing - it for sure fits the definition. I'm not exactly sad about it - Musk is helping to rip apart the country and I have a hard time blaming people who feel that helping to rip apart one of his companies is about all they can do - but committing arson to further an ideology is terrorism.

[-] Ulrich@feddit.org 4 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Not sure why some people are disagreeing

They don't like the connotation. Which is fair. Nuance is hard and if you say "yes, we're terrorists" there's no way that's not going to be wielded against "your people" in the court of public opinion.

But facts are facts.

[-] sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip 19 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Yes, but that definition also defines... basically all the most heinous things that Trump and those around him have done in the last... 5 years, lets say? ... as terrorism.

Remember CPAC, 2022?

... kinda speaks for itself.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[-] pyre@lemmy.world 4 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

they should amend this Wikipedia article to include teslas https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spontaneous_combustion

[-] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 16 points 7 hours ago

Can't believe the Insurrection Act is gonna be used because of homie's swasticars

[-] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 39 points 9 hours ago

I have never, and will never, see anyone vandalize a Tesla. 🙈

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2025
575 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

66783 readers
4462 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS