I've never met a Zoroastrian and I'd bet you haven't either.

Buddhism in the experience of any Anglophone is likely to be pleasant metaphysical nothings.

Judaism is more often the target of hatred than its source, and while that balance swings precipitously for Orthodox communities, they're few and far between.

The simple fact of the matter is - Christianity is overwhelmingly what fucks with English-speaking nations 24/7, and Islam only sticks out for some extremely specific events. Do I need an on-record opinion of Mongol animistic faith and Bantu shamanic ritual before I'm allowed to talk shit about apostasy and Leviticus?

Do you ever find yourself in discussions about religion where the topics of discussion include Zoroaster?

You can criticize one bad thing without criticizing every other example of that bad thing. I don't need to go through the list of every Republican president just to talk about how bad Trump was. I don't need to go through the list of every serial killer to talk about how evil John Wayne Gacy was.

Christianity and Islam are the world's two biggest religions. Obviously, discussions about them will come up more than discussions about other religions in many parts of the world. "Yeah, but what about the Zoroastrians?" doesn't really make much headway in such discussions and isn't really relevant to them.

Do you often find yourself in "discussions about religion" where your primary contribution is to complain about Christianity and Islam?

I live in Denmark where Christianity is the biggest religion, so it's the one I have had shoved down my throat the most, which makes it the most obvious to criticize (because it's the one I know the most about). As many people know Denmark has been on the news a lot lately because of people burning books. This has been a major topic in the Danish media even before the story spread across the world, so it's been something I've debated on the regular the last couple of years as well. Those debates have mostly focused on the book burners though, and my criticism would be limited to something like "it's just a book". This is why I mentioned those two religions in my original post.

I don't know much about Zoroastrianism or Buddhism, so I wouldn't know what to criticize. The same pretty much goes for Judaism, though I guess I know a bit more about that religion, seeing as Christianity is mostly built upon the Jewish scriptures.

Covering the big three: Christianity, Islam, and Hinduism generally gets majority of the current worst offenders. But notes about the extremists version of Judaism, Buddhism, and other should be made too.

No different. Their religions are all trash. Do you have one? It's trash too. The only culture of religion is to do what you're told and not ask questions. That's trash.

I don't disagree with any of that. However, deconversion does happen past childhood in some cases, thankfully.

It takes around 20 seconds to find the first logical fallacy in the Bible. So no, they're not as wise and smart.

No, it really has the recognizable ChatGPT writing style to it.

Making fun of any religion, including Islam, can be considered disrespectful and offensive to believers. It's important to treat all religions with sensitivity and respect to promote understanding and harmony among different communities. Keep in mind that cultural and religious differences should be approached with empathy and consideration for the feelings of others.

It's the sentence structure at the end... The call for empathy and the consideration of others feelings. Chatgpt is programmed to respond in this way on "controversial" topics.

Edit:

Also, to answer your question. Bless your heart. I am not trying to discredit anything. I am trying to figure out if it's a bot and if I need to ban it from the community and report it to the admins... Sweetheart, you know it's not nice to be so aggressive in your accusations right?