101
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by Irelephant@lemm.ee to c/fediverse@lemmy.world

It would tie in better with the email analogy, and it could show that they all just provide access to the same network.

What do you think?

top 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] misk@sopuli.xyz 46 points 1 day ago

I’m afraid that when I say „my Lemmy provider” people will think I’m referring to my drug dealer.

Lemmy and Molly (foss) are the most addictive. 🤣🤣

[-] meldrik@lemmy.wtf 6 points 1 day ago

“Psst… Hey, you. Wanna buy some SoMe?”

[-] xnx@slrpnk.net 16 points 1 day ago

Servers are a better word for it imo. It is what it actually is and average people already understand servers from discord

[-] running_system@feddit.org 3 points 1 day ago

"Average people" don't even know what Discord is

[-] unhrpetby@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago

Discord servers are just groups. Lemmy "instances" are actual separate instances of Lemmy communicating.

[-] xnx@slrpnk.net 8 points 1 day ago

I know. What im saying is the word server isnt too technical and is both easier to understand and technically correct

People can perfectly understand terms like instance or server...if they are explained to them.

They are also accustomed to concepts like social media and social network that can also be used to explain the Fediverse. Each server is its own social media platforms interacting with eachother through a distributed social network.

But, I actually think the Fediverse require an intermediate point between social media and social network, or something above it.

If the Fediverse (including in this case all decentralised protocols like ActivityPub, Zot/Nomad, Diaspora, Ostatus, AT Proto, etc) is a Social network and each particular instance it's own social media platforms that interact within the network, the software they run and the community they form part of within the wider fediverse is an intermediate stage between social medium and social network.
Now, if each server/instance are social media platforms and the software they run are the social network; the protocol or protocol they use is/are a network of networks and the Fediverse a network of networks of networks of social media platforms.

[-] Blaze@lemmy.dbzer0.com 28 points 1 day ago

I was thinking the same. Provider is easier to understand, and used in daily life contexts.

  • I changed my Internet provider
  • This electricity provider offers better service
[-] kubica@fedia.io 11 points 1 day ago

How would the word be used in our context? The Fediverse provider?

But I think I associate the word with money related activities and I'm not a fan of that.

[-] boydster@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 day ago

I would think the jargon would be "I chose fedia.io as my Lemmy provider," or similar for other federated platforms.

[-] Nougat@fedia.io 4 points 1 day ago

Oh god no. That's like "I chose Burger King as my McDonald's provider."

[-] SmokeInFog@midwest.social 7 points 1 day ago

Not really. In that metaphor it's more like, "I chose the McDonald's down at the corner to get my Big Mac instead of the one across town."

[-] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

"I can get a Whopper from McDonald's and I don't have to see any crap from Papa John's because McDonalds is defederated from them."

Provider doesn't make any sense when the content is coming from other places.

[-] Blaze@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 day ago

But Burger King and McDonalds are the same type of entities.

Fedia.io and Lemmy are different. Your example would be "Lemmy as a Piefed provider", or "Feddit.org as a feddit.uk provider"

[-] Nougat@fedia.io 3 points 1 day ago

Yeah it's even worse than that.

fedia.io is a specific "provider" in this context. fedia.io runs on mbin. Lemmy is analogous to mbin. Many "providers" run on lemmy: lemmy.world, lemmy.dbzer0.com, lemmy.wtf, etc.

What is being provided is fediverse access. "Fediverse" is not my mostest favorite term, but it's the one that's most accurate.

[-] Blaze@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 day ago

What is being provided is fediverse access. “Fediverse” is not my mostest favorite term, but it’s the one that’s most accurate.

There's a discussion on !fedibridge@lemmy.dbzer0.com about a name for Lemmy/Mbin/Piefed, as they are actually compatible. Mastodon and the others always feels a bit finicky. Feel free to contribute.

[-] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Fine, "I choose Burger King as my hamburger provider but I expect to be able to access a Big Mac from Burger King unless they are defederated."

[-] bacon_saber@fedia.io 4 points 1 day ago

Ok, have it your way then

[-] Blaze@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago

"I use Vodafone as my phone provider. Can't call people in North Korea because they cut that connection. I might have to choose another provider that still allows me to call there".

[-] boydster@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I mean, it's not like that at all, but it's ok to not care for it still. Lemmy is a federated platform, just like Pixelfed is, and Mastodon, etc. Those would be the providers in the example from before.

Edit to add: Literally every time the word "instance" comes up in the manner noted above, it's woth regard to a Lemmy instance, or a Mastodon instance, and rarely if ever have I noticed a reference to a "fediverse instance". I have no clue where your comparison comes from.

[-] Nougat@fedia.io 2 points 1 day ago

Lemmy is a server application. Mastodon is a server application. Pixelfed is a server application.

I don't use Lemmy. Never have. And yet here I am.

[-] Blaze@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 day ago

"I recommend feddit.uk as a Lemmy provider for people living in the UK"

"Feddit.org is a good provider for German speakers"

[-] Steve@communick.news 4 points 1 day ago

I associate the word with money related activities

That's a good thing. It costs money to provide services to people. The Fediverse is no different.

[-] Irelephant@lemm.ee 6 points 1 day ago

Yes, thats what I was thinking.

I was thinking about other decentralised networks people may use, and they all seem to use the word "provider":

  • Email provider
  • Internet provider
  • Usenet provider
[-] MajorHavoc@programming.dev 7 points 1 day ago

That's what resonates for me.

We don't have email instances, and email providers similarly block un-desired content, but there's not a big fuss about missing out on specific types of spam. Lol.

Similarly Internet service providers actually also block big blocks of malware providing domains, and accidentally sometimes block some great piracy resources. People who care learn to use a VPN or switch providers. Everyone else doesn't have to think about it.

I'll argue that The Fediverse also carries extremely similar switching cost as an email or Internet provider. For an average user, "Let folks you care to inform know where you moved, and maybe copy over some favorite bookmarks."

Sure, different providers do try to bring different lenses on the same federated content, but most people aren't served well by thinking about it on day one.

I think shifting to the term provider is a lot more honest to the user about what to expect.

[-] TORFdot0@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Provider has the connotation of being a paid provider for services. While it’s a technically accurate analogy, I prefer the more abstract comparison of considering the fediverse a meeting place rather than a paid service since it’s a mostly volunteer and self hosted network compared to email.

[-] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I disagree. Gmail is my email provider. I don't pay for it. (Yeah I know they are taking ad revenue.)

Instance is unnecessary jargon.

[-] Blaze@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago

Indeed, but unfortunately there's no word for a volunteer provider as far as I know.

[-] freamon@preferred.social 8 points 1 day ago

As a term, 'instance' is already baked into code, databases, and APIs.

If I wanted to use an API to block 'lemmy.world', for example, I'd call 'site/block' with the relevant 'instance_id'. That's already 2 different terms for the same thing ('site' and 'instance'), which isn't great, but adding 'provider' into the mix means you're now saying "if you want to block a 'provider', use the 'site' endpoint with the ID for the 'instance'", which is arguably worse.

[-] Wilco@lemm.ee 5 points 1 day ago

Call them States ... like states within a federation.

[-] froggycar360@slrpnk.net 10 points 1 day ago

I like server better

[-] confuser@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 day ago

I agree, let's make it more friendly to people wanting to start a fediverse provider as a business so a big company can't come in and gobble up everyone

[-] hendrik@palaver.p3x.de 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Sure, go ahead. Technically it's not 100% correct. I mean lemm.ee wouldn't be your provider, it'd be the people operating the server who provide the service to you... But I think it's close enough. Only issue I can see is the term "provider" usually being used with commercial services. Like a cellphone provider or ISP. So I'm not sure if people start to think this costs $10 a month or something and is run by for-profit businesses... But we also use the word "provider" for free things, so I'm not entirely sure about that. But generally speaking I think we use different terminology because we don't think of the Fediverse as a product.

[-] erotador 7 points 1 day ago

I just say server hosts

[-] MajorHavoc@programming.dev 6 points 1 day ago

That's fantastic. Provider avoids the mostly baseless FOMO (fear of missing out) that instance can invoke.

I think provider more clearly communicates that the majority of the desirable content is going to be available the same through any provider.

[-] squirrel@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 day ago

FSP = Fediverse Service Provider

[-] Irelephant@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago

That doesn't sound too bad ngl.

[-] Die4Ever@programming.dev 2 points 1 day ago

usually when I tell someone what an instance is, I throw a few synonyms in there

I feel like just saying "instance/proxy" can help, providers sounds good too, also gateways, servers, relays...

I made an old discussion about this actually

https://programming.dev/post/3658116

https://programming.dev/post/3658268

[-] Irelephant@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago

Hey, someone had the same thought as me! https://programming.dev/post/3658268/3322305

this post was submitted on 07 Mar 2025
101 points (100.0% liked)

Fediverse

30955 readers
1032 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS