215
all 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Octagon9561@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 days ago

It will still be sold at a fraction of what Apple charges for their far inferior SSDs.

[-] Chadus_Maximus@lemm.ee 17 points 2 days ago

Impressive. Very nice. Now let's see the random read/write speed.

[-] WhiteRice@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 days ago

Let’s see Paul Allen’s io.

[-] Peffse@lemmy.world 30 points 3 days ago

I just want bigger drives... I feel like we've been stuck at 1TB for at least a decade.

[-] Godort@lemm.ee 26 points 3 days ago

You can get spinning rust all the way up to 32 TB in a single 3.5" disk and 8 TB in an NVMe drive. The tech is out there, but it takes time for the price of stuff like that to come down when there isnt much demand for it.

[-] Peffse@lemmy.world 19 points 3 days ago

I refuse to believe there isn't much demand for it when we have MicroSD cards approaching 2TB.

[-] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I do think the demand decreased in the past decade. The average consumer has their photos and documents in the cloud and signs up to streaming services for movies, shows, and music. Local storage is not as important as it used to be.

[-] evidences@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

But on the opposite end games are only getting bigger and fast internet is still semi expensive so having large drives would be beneficial to people that want to keep multiple games installed on their PC/console.

[-] Peffse@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

fair point, even the MicroSD market would target the mobile user and not so much a desktop.

[-] ChairmanMeow@programming.dev 2 points 3 days ago

Mostly the photography market as far as I know, those raw images take up a lot of space.

[-] ramble81@lemm.ee 4 points 2 days ago

There are 32 and 64TB enterprise SSDs out there now too.

[-] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 3 days ago

There's lots of demand for large drives, it's mostly for enterprise drives though.

[-] GeekySalsa@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago

SSDs have gotten much cheaper. 10 years ago, they were over $0.50/GB, now they're just over $0.04/GB That's over 12 times cheaper.

You can get a 2tb ssd for $85. 10 years ago a 2tb ssd would've been super expensive and very boogie.

[-] hark@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

SSDs were even cheaper until memory manufacturers decided it was getting too cheap: https://www.tomshardware.com/pc-components/ssds/ssd-prices-predicted-to-skyrocket-throughout-2024

They predicted prices would go higher and, through the magic of intentionally constricting supply, it happened. Prices still have not dropped back down to where they were in 2023.

[-] GeekySalsa@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I'm not sure if SSDs were really cheaper before. RIght now, I'm seeing about $0.043-$0.05/GB. From what I recall, that's about the same or a little better than what we had in 2023.

However, I very much agree that prices should have decreased much further in that time.

[-] hark@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

This isn't extensive, but when looking up products on amazon through camelcamelcamel that existed in 2023 and now, the trend matches up:

https://camelcamelcamel.com/product/B07ZQ97H3W

https://camelcamelcamel.com/product/B09QV5KJHV

[-] qaz@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Where can you get a 2TB SSD for $85? Most 2TB SSD's I've seen cost about €120 with the cheapest going down to €98.

[-] GeekySalsa@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

There are several options here below $90 (including a couple nvme ones), and a couple at or below $85: https://pcpartpicker.com/products/internal-hard-drive/#t=0&sort=price&page=1&A=1600000000000%2C24000000000000

[-] Valmond@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

Yeah, my 2013 black 1TB cost like 100€ so 12 years ago, prices are going down but not really falling off a cliff lol.

[-] imnapr@discuss.tchncs.de 22 points 3 days ago

The next monster hunter is gonna require this in the specs

[-] Apoplexy@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago

Sequential read/write is very rarely interesting, cool to see it's possible though. Random read/write and IOPS are much more important for daily use, preferably numbers without cache. Better cell endurance is always a bonus too, though I have yet to have a SSD die on me, probably just luck at this point.

[-] jollyrogue@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 days ago

Okay cool, but post the random IOPs please.

[-] chunkystyles@sopuli.xyz 8 points 2 days ago

I have never once been about to tell a real world difference in SSD speeds. Until OS I/O code improves, faster SSDs don't excite me.

[-] KinglyWeevil@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 days ago

There was a jump between old early gen SATA SSDs and modern NVMe in my opinion, but it's really only noticable if you're running something like a game with a huge amount of data to load, and you're actively comparing the two.

My old PC had several different hard drives of differing types and I'd periodically be too lazy to move a game from one drive to another so I'd play it off different drives over a period of time, and was able to compare the loading times.

So I'd say they're faster, but it's nowhere near the leap that HDD to SSD was.

[-] chunkystyles@sopuli.xyz 4 points 2 days ago

I agree. HDD to SSD was a huge leap. NVME was a small, sometimes noticable upgrade. Past that, I can't tell a difference. And it's hard to get excited about the hardware updates when the software can't use it.

[-] Trashboat 10 points 3 days ago

It’s late and with all the other politics in my feed, I read that as Macron at first, and spent longer than I want to admit seriously imagining him on stage demoing this to show a new French foray into tech or something

[-] Godort@lemm.ee 10 points 3 days ago

When do we start needing active coolers for our drives?

[-] kusivittula@sopuli.xyz 4 points 3 days ago

i have a samsung 2.5" ssd and it actually would benefit from active cooling. when i installed my os, downloaded my steam games, and then made a copy of one (because steam insists on updating which breaks mods) and noticed that write speed was slow af...so i tested with kdiskmark and all speeds were exactly at 75mb/s while they should be at like 550. it throttled to keep temperature under 60c.

[-] SuiXi3D@fedia.io 3 points 3 days ago
[-] randombullet@programming.dev 3 points 3 days ago

Enterprise NVMe drives have some active cooling, but it's mostly due to high density

[-] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 3 days ago

It wasn't that long ago when RAM had similar transfer speeds.

With PCIe 6, consumer grade SSDs shouldn't need more than a single lane. That will be nice since AMD and Intel have been pretty skimpy with the PCIe lanes lately.

[-] Valmond@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

What about latency though?

[-] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 3 days ago

The latency of RAM has been around 10ns for the last couple decades. The latency of a good NVMe SSD is about 1000 times worse than RAM.

[-] Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 days ago

the problem at least in the shortrun, is that if you got that many ssds running in single lane on a consumer platform at the likely inflated cost the drives would be, it would almost be cheaper just to get the workstation platform at that point.

[-] wabafee@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

I wonder if we reach to the point we're RAM would be unnecessary.

[-] wasabi@feddit.org 5 points 2 days ago

27GB/s is faster than DDR4 RAM.

[-] hark@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Just wait until they come out with DDR4 SAM.

this post was submitted on 07 Mar 2025
215 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

64937 readers
3619 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS