225
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] splonglo@lemmy.world 9 points 1 hour ago

Another nit-pick by the circular firing squad of so-called progressives.

True American Patriots like Bernie understand that the USA was mearly subverted away from the Light of Democracy by malign actors.

[-] habitualcynic@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago

Gaslighting from fascist twitter users more than circling firing squad. Definitely took an opportunity to try to dig at the GOAT.

[-] splonglo@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago

Solid theory. The right does love to trawl through history looking for failed authoritarian regimes to soy over.

[-] segabased@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 hour ago

Who needs the CIA when we have useful idiots that sink any working class movement with shit like this

[-] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 hour ago

If a working class movement needs to lie and gaslight people into American exceptionalism it is not a working class movement.

[-] segabased@lemmy.zip 3 points 50 minutes ago

Anyone that meets the working class where they are to build class consciousness in terms they understand are building the working class movement.

But I guess we can nitpick and siphon the air out of any sort of potential for progress by doing the work of fascist apologists. Jailing and killing socialists will really bring about the perfect revolution we need

[-] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 1 points 12 minutes ago

Accepting reality is fine. Gaslighting and covering for an oppressive system is not. Especially since this supposed movement has failed to make any gains with its endless compromises.

If the movement is only beneficial for the empire and not its victims I care little for it.

[-] exploitedamerican@lemm.ee 2 points 56 minutes ago* (last edited 55 minutes ago)

Unfortunately sanders is one of our better actors within the institution. Many leftists would have been happy and welcoming of a sanders administration for 2 terms. FDR was also partially aligned with fascists but as far as presidential administrations go he did the most for the working class that anyone ever did(thankfully he was elected for 4 terms) sanders however flawed he may be would have been as close to a new age fdr as we were ever going tk get and this is why the dnc shot themselves in the foot and disgraced their electorate. The democratic party is a center right party so yes bernie sanders is a little too close to center to be a real leftist and he compromises too much with centrists and conservatives but this is the only way to get things done within a partisan class dictatorship we have.

But since the dnc made it clear they would rather move to the right and attempt to court conservative voters rather than move even a centimeter to the left they made it crystal clear the only way to remedy the rot and corruption of corporatist control in our political system is a full on revolution/ class war which has been waged against the working class for the last 5-6 decades at least.

[-] segabased@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 hour ago

Yes let's shit on fascist resistance with "uhm actually"

[-] thefrozenorth@sh.itjust.works 30 points 3 hours ago

This is not fact checking. This is gaslighting. The fact that the USA has been supporting dictators for decades does not change or alter what Bernie is saying.

[-] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 hour ago

Supporting manufacturing war against Russia without regards to their security concerns, or talking to them, may have been a necessity in loyalty to Biden. Keeping up the charade is definitely not progressive.

[-] sxan@midwest.social 32 points 5 hours ago
[-] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 8 points 5 hours ago
[-] formulaBonk@lemm.ee 6 points 2 hours ago

Even if you disagree with what that guy wrote it’s not in any way virtue signaling. Like brother what?

[-] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 9 points 5 hours ago

Of course they provide for the dictatorships, who do you think put them there in the first place? It's called responsible parenting sweaty 💅

[-] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 4 points 4 hours ago

Congress had to lift a ban on arming neo-Nazis in order to send weapons to Ukraine. And Bernie, a supposed progressive, is arguing the US should continue a brutal proxy war by continuing to arm extremists.

This country has lost its fucking mind.

[-] usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca 37 points 7 hours ago

You can do both. Saying they've supported dictatorships doesn't mean they haven't also supported democracy. It's bordering on being a non sequitur.

[-] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 hours ago

If the US ever supports democracy, it is purely by accident.

[-] turtle@lemm.ee 3 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 58 minutes ago)

Where we read "democracy", they read "economic benefit" or "geopolitical benefit". As far as I'm aware, any "democratic movement" that the US has ever supported has been either to get rid of a not sufficiently capitalist regime (whether or not they were democratic), or for some other geopolitical strategic reason.

I haven't heard of a single example of the US supporting a democracy purely for democracy's sake. Sometimes it just so happens that the goals of supporting democracy and getting rid of pesky regimes that pose an economic or strategic obstacle align.

Not to mention that the US has been involved in regime change of many democracies over the last 80 years because they weren't sufficiently friendly to American companies or didn't support American strategic goals strongly enough. This is open, well-documented history. The CIA admits to many of the ones which were done at least 50 years ago.

Here is a list to get started: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_involvement_in_regime_change

[-] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 hour ago

It is to own the winner.

[-] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 8 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

No you can't. You cannot say you support racial equality while holding a BLM sign one day and attending a KKK rally the next.

[-] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 9 points 4 hours ago

If I give you a dollar and I give Steve a dollar, I've supported you both.

Your example is also wrong. BLM and KKK are organizations. You absolutely can support both organizations by giving them money. It makes you a hypocrite and means you don't believe in equality. But when has anyone claimed the United States isn't hypocritical?

[-] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Steve and me are entities. Democracy is an ideology.

You cannot support an ideology while also supporting its polar opposite.

[-] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Yes, I can, if I choose to be a hypocrite. I can push for both.

Picture a seesaw. Polar opposite sides. Raising one lowers the other. We can support both sides with bricks to make it a table. Both sides are supported. But neither shows progress.

I think we're disagreeing on the word supported.

[-] sartalon@lemmy.world 11 points 5 hours ago

Jesus that's a helluva straw man you got there.

🎶 If you only had a brain...🎶

[-] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 4 points 5 hours ago

Exact same thing but you are too hypocritic to admit it.

[-] sartalon@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

How can I have made a straw man argument when I didn't even make an argument!?

[-] djmikeale@lemm.ee 10 points 6 hours ago

Whether technically correct or not (as I don't know anything about this topic), what's going on right now is insane, and if weapons were being sold to baddies under Obama, that also sounds shitty. So seems like any time is a good time to reflect upon how much power USA's militarily-industrial complex possesses.

[-] isgleas@lemmy.ml 11 points 7 hours ago

arewethebaddies.gif

[-] ceenote@lemmy.world 96 points 10 hours ago

"Technically, the United States didn't get bad, it's always been bad! It only got worse!" isn't the flex a lot of leftists think it is.

[-] naeap@sopuli.xyz 1 points 4 hours ago

What has this to do with "lefties"?
A dictatorship and dismantling everything inside the country and destroying relationships with allies can't be good either way

Or do I miss something?

load more comments (19 replies)
[-] TheObviousSolution@kbin.melroy.org 54 points 9 hours ago

Except one does not contradict the other. The United States has supported democracy, it's just that that support is razor thin.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 06 Mar 2025
225 points (100.0% liked)

Progressive Politics

1778 readers
1024 users here now

Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)

(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS