306
top 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Lemmywings@lemmy.cafe 5 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Hate to say it, but he was actually right on this one. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36484619/

$455,000: “A Mouse Model to Test the Effects of Gender-affirming Hormone Therapy on HIV Vaccine-induced Immune Responses”

$2,500,000: “Reproductive Consequences of Steroid Hormone Administration” “These mice manifest defects in ovarian architecture and have altered folliculogenesis.”

$299,940: “Gender-Affirming Testosterone Therapy on Breast Cancer Risk and Treatment Outcomes” “We will compare the incidences and tumor specific survival in female mice (intact) and oophorectomized female mice receiving TT with their respective counterparts that do not receive TT.”

$735,113: “Microbiome mediated effects of gender affirming hormone therapy in mice”

$1,200,000: “Androgen effects on the reproductive neuroendocrine axis” “Aim 2 utilizes transgenic mice to test whether male-level androgens acting via AR specifically in kisspeptin neurons are necessary and/or sufficient for androgen inhibition of in vivo LH pulse parameters, including pulse frequency, and the estrogen-induced LH surge.”

$3,100,000: “Gonadal hormones as mediators of sex and gender influences in asthma” “We will study the contributions of estrogens to HDM-induced asthma outcomes using male and female gonadectomized mice treated with estradiol…”

[-] EtherWhack@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

Either way the numbskull and his lackies clearly don't understand medical science or the testing/research that is required for any medical treatment before it is applied to humans.

[-] Gloomy@mander.xyz 8 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Testing Gender and Transrelated Medicine is not "Making Mice Transgender".

But yes, the spending was to test a medical treatment, the same way how many medical treatments are tested. He is opposing this specific research for ideological reasons, of course.

[-] OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world 48 points 23 hours ago

trump still thinks that asylum seekers are people who came to this country from mental asylums.

He’s as dumb as a pile of rusty spoons.

[-] Tja@programming.dev 15 points 22 hours ago

He also thinks stealth fighters are invisible planes. And that injecting bleach is a covid treatment. And...

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 9 points 19 hours ago

...and that nuking a hurricane is a thing.

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 3 points 9 hours ago

Let him try, there will be enough hurricanes coming this season, even if the NOAA will be no longer around to warn people. And they are mostly heading to red states, so they would make a perfect testing ground.

[-] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 37 points 1 day ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

Oh no, he exposed the extreme left's secret plan for... checks notes ...creating an army of transgender mice for evil reasons beyond anyone's comprehension!

[-] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 3 points 19 hours ago

I think his team feeds him low budget sci fi movie pitches rather than actual security briefings.

[-] miss_demeanour@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 1 day ago

Transgenic/Transgender...it's all TrAnS!!
-- maga

[-] WalrusDragonOnABike@reddthat.com 9 points 23 hours ago

Soon we'll abolish all transportation for being woke!

[-] hansolo@lemm.ee 3 points 15 hours ago

No! We want only Maleportation and Femaleportation, as was determined by the vehicle's zygote at conception. /s

[-] Tja@programming.dev 6 points 22 hours ago

All devices including transistors are woke and should be destroyed.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago

Wait until more of these dum-dums learn about transhumanism, LOL. The likes of Alex Jones have been harping on about it for a long time, but I don't think it's really hit mainstream still.

[-] HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works 9 points 23 hours ago

For the life of me I cannot understand why America elected such a dim witted, racist misogynistic twat ... twice ffs!!!

[-] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 8 points 21 hours ago

A lot of us didn’t.

Also a lot decided to not vote at all. That’s really what sank us. Only 63% of eligible voters voted, and of the popular vote, trump won 49.8%. So basically 1/3 of Americans actively elected trump, and whoever in the remaining ~40% that decided to not at least vote against trump ensured we got him.

[-] arcterus 4 points 20 hours ago

This is not strictly true, even if it's repeated a lot. Because of our voting system, a large number of people likely didn't vote because they didn't need to vote. For instance, you pretty much know how things will end up in California or Idaho even before the votes are tallied. People who didn't vote in swing states on the other hand...

Strongly disagree. There's local shit to vote for, which usually has a much more direct impact on the average voters' day to day.

[-] arcterus 1 points 10 hours ago

As mentioned in another reply, obv that's important, but in the context of the presidential election specifically, it often doesn't matter. Also, the parent comments were talking about electing Trump, not state and local elections.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 7 points 19 hours ago

Because of our voting system, a large number of people likely didn’t vote because they didn’t need to vote.

Sadly, many people think they only need to vote for Presidents, so you are probably right, although it's that they felt they didn't need to vote...even though down-ballot probably matters just as much.

[-] arcterus 3 points 11 hours ago

Yeah, obv state and local elections are very important as well, although in some cases even those elections don't really require people to vote due to district composition. Generally, I agree with you though. I was mainly pointing out that the popular vote for the presidential election basically does not matter.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago

Yes. Well said.

[-] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago

Nothing I said is untrue, strictly or otherwise.

https://www.cfr.org/article/2024-election-numbers

I did not get into the debate about the EC because the discussion is about the people that voted or did not vote for trump, not how he won.

[-] arcterus 2 points 12 hours ago

My entire point was that the popular vote basically does not matter (and tbh shouldn't matter since FPTP is terrible, although the EC is also terrible), so you saying that Trump being elected because people didn't vote isn't necessarily the issue here. Even if literally everyone in the country voted, as long as the states ended up the same way, Trump would still have won.

[-] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

You’re not listening. I can’t tell of you’re being obstinate or just trying to force a different perspective to make yourself right or something.

The entire point of the conversation is Americans, not electoral votes, therefore the popular vote, those who voted, and those who did not vote are the germane factors to the discussion. The EC is not relevant in this context.

[-] arcterus 1 points 10 hours ago

Whose votes lead to the EC results? Americans. The arbitrary distinction you are trying to make here is ridiculous.

[-] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago
[-] arcterus 2 points 9 hours ago

Your original comment said: "Also a lot decided to not vote at all. That’s really what sank us."

Clearly, the popular vote is not what sank us. The one trying to argue something different so you'd win the argument is you.

[-] HowAbt2morrow@futurology.today 3 points 23 hours ago

Transwomen mice with testicular cancer breast feeding gay mice is horrific and must stop now.

[-] phx@lemmy.ca 5 points 20 hours ago

Well they had to do something after they weren't allowed to make frogs gay anymore ^^

[-] QuantumSparkles@sh.itjust.works 1 points 22 hours ago
[-] HowAbt2morrow@futurology.today 1 points 21 hours ago

Oh, you like that do ya? 🤫

this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2025
306 points (100.0% liked)

News

25742 readers
3233 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS