277
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by Zenlix@lemm.ee to c/technology@lemmy.world

Apparently mozilla wants the right to get data from firefox users. But not like general information, they want to know what data you upload or download through firefox.

Without it, we couldn’t use information typed into Firefox, for example.

What the fuck? I use firefox because I want privacy!!! Not sharing my information with a company.

We need a license to allow us to make some of the basic functionality of Firefox possible. WHY DO YOU NEED MY DATA TO MAKE FIREFOX WORK???

all 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] RagingSnarkasm@lemmy.world 97 points 1 week ago

At a time when they could actually be pushing the Manifest issue and try to finally get a foothold, instead it feels like they have scattered rakes around the yard in the middle of the night and decided to go for a jog.

[-] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 10 points 1 week ago

it's not like anyone who cares hasn't pulled up stakes tbh

[-] dojan@lemmy.world 55 points 1 week ago
[-] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 18 points 1 week ago

Thanks to that overpaid ceo.

[-] solrize@lemmy.world 54 points 1 week ago

Besides the privacy issue, the TOU is ridiculous. They supply a tool (the browser) and you use it. It's not a collaboration between you and them. You can use it whatever way you want.

[-] cyrano@lemmy.dbzer0.com 38 points 1 week ago

Get ready for ads as well

https://github.com/mozilla/bedrock/commit/d459addab846d8144b61939b7f4310eb80c5470e#commitcomment-153095625

They removed this:


            {

                "@type": "Question",

                "name": "Does Firefox sell your personal data?",

                "acceptedAnswer": {

                    "@type": "Answer",

                    "text": "Nope. Never have, never will. And we protect you from many of the advertisers who do. Firefox products are designed to protect your privacy. That’s a promise. "

                }

            },

[-] Zenlix@lemm.ee 18 points 1 week ago

I hate that they had "never will" in there. Seems like a broken promise.

[-] Retro_unlimited@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

They broke a promise and they broke my heart 💔💔💔

[-] cupcakezealot 30 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

i still like mozilla (and I donate to them monthly because i believe in the mission of an open internet) and, unlike most people, i don't think this is a very big deal.

however, i don't want to put all my eggs in one basket so... are there any other ethical pro open internet evangelist groups i should start to follow or contribute to? preferably an ethical foundation that isn't cryptofash or bigoted. i know there's the eff but they're not really focused on an open and free internet, they're more privacy (nothing against them; i love them).

bonus if they're not hq'd in the us.

[-] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago

You might not be using functions that require data to work. Are you using the AI options? Image to text? Translation? Saving passwords? Using search suggestions? Then you don't need to send any data.

Like it or not, most browsers do most of those things now. FireFox is no exception.

This seems like a lot of smoke and no fire to me.

[-] breakfastmtn@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 week ago

Even writing a post, you're entering data through Firefox into the post box. We just don't consider that data. It would be pretty quiet around here if you couldn't do that...

[-] puppinstuff@lemmy.ca 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Well shoot if Firefox goes I guess we’re back to carrier pigeons and smoke signals.

[-] Captainautism@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 week ago
[-] tux0r@feddit.org 3 points 1 week ago

Or just make NetSurf good enough?

[-] MCasq_qsaCJ_234@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 week ago

NetSurf updates are very slow

[-] tux0r@feddit.org 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

NetSurf needs more developers, which is one of the reasons for the development pace, and I'm happy for every occasion to help them get more, so here's today's one.

(Mature software needs fewer updates than fresh software too, but that's probably not the most critical aspect here.)

[-] crank0271@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

I have really high hopes that Ladybird picks up the slack

[-] tux0r@feddit.org 5 points 1 week ago

Or make NetSurf good enough? It's mature (and lacking developers), Ladybird is not.

[-] Krik@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 week ago

WHY DO YOU NEED MY DATA TO MAKE FIREFOX WORK???

They don't care about your actual data, they care about how Firefox is used. That's an incredible important piece of information every developer needs to know.
How else do you get to know, what's working right and what doesn't? How do you plan development for the next years if you don't know what to develop?

This is about throwing millions of $ at the right thing. If you miss you are fucked.

[-] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 week ago

If data can be abused it will be abused.

[-] boreengreen@lemm.ee 5 points 1 week ago

You use your own software and read bug reports.

[-] Krik@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago

That only gives you a biased and incomplete insight.

[-] swizzlestick@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 week ago

Used FF forever, even though the birth and rise of Chrome.

We're done. The company I IT for therefore is also done. As are friends and family I sort computers for.

The shit now stinks and must be taken out.

[-] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago

Reading through their privacy policy, it seems pretty normal stuff to me... Even ensuring that more data stays local than other browsers.

This sounds like bad communication more than bad software.

[-] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 week ago

This isn’t really even bad communication. This is idiots with a platform screaming FUD for attention.

[-] tux0r@feddit.org 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Used FF forever

So you probably should remember the Mozilla FAQ entry that it's "Firefox", not "FireFox"; and that's why they prefer "fx" because "FF" makes no sense. ;-p

[-] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 week ago

Time to switch to the Mullvad browser!

[-] Parsizzle@lemm.ee 4 points 1 week ago

Please pardon my ignorance on the matter, how does Mullvad compare to Brave?

[-] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The Mullvad browser is based on the gecko engine while Brave is based on chromium.

I dont trust Brave much because the ceo Brendan Eich is into right-wing politics and bitcoin.

https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-26868536

[-] lnxtx@feddit.nl 3 points 1 week ago

An alternative browser (not based on the Chromium) should be driven by the community (vide Proton).

[-] WhatSay@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 week ago
[-] WhatSay@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 week ago

Alternatively...

[-] tux0r@feddit.org 4 points 1 week ago

Oh no, does this mean that Mozilla doesn't give a damn about the privacy of their last twelve users? I.e. those who did not see that coming a decade ago?

[-] Schlemmy@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 week ago

There is the part where you interact with Forefox. Without your data, it just won't work. They need your timezone, your screen size,... I mean, that's for every browser around, even the most hardened system. This data can be used for fingerprinting so you should be aware and you should agree upon that usage or quit the internet.

i.e. using a browser is sending data towards that browser.

this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2025
277 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

64937 readers
3827 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS