78
top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 13 points 9 months ago

Explanation: While the Romans rarely had trouble with the infantry rabble of the Parthian Empire, the Parthian cavalry was a formidable force on the battlefield, consisting primary of noble-born heavily-armored lancers, and nomadic horse archers. The horse archers would harass Roman infantry, staying out of javelin range, and loosing arrows as they rode away when pursued - the famous 'Parthian shot'. Should the Romans break formation, or else try to form a testudo, the heavily armored lancers would ride them down.

Rome never really did form a full answer to this double threat, and Persia remained a dream for every conquest-oriented Emperor.

[-] Remix9@fedia.io 9 points 9 months ago

It’s not like there’s going to be a civilization later on that came from the steppes and curb stomp other nonhorseback civilizations right‽

[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 5 points 9 months ago

The Abbasid Caliphate: Yes, I'm a nonhorseback civilization. It's better this way.

::: spoiler The Abbasid Caliphate, and the Rashidun and Umayyad Caliphate before them came to regional dominance in part because of their strong horseback cavalries. The Mongols curb stomped them anyway. :::

this post was submitted on 24 Feb 2025
78 points (100.0% liked)

[Dormant] moved to !historymemes@piefed.social

3454 readers
1 users here now

THIS COMM HAS MOVED

!historymemes@piefed.social

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS