680
submitted 2 years ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

India just landed on the Moon for less than it cost to make Interstellar | The Independent::undefined

all 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] SGG@lemmy.world 239 points 2 years ago

Why is this even a comparison? India only went to the moon, interstellar had to go to other freaking solar systems and a black hole to make their documentary!

[-] XTornado@lemmy.ml 49 points 2 years ago

With humans aswell and robots!

[-] blackluster117@possumpat.io 6 points 2 years ago

Robots with feelings! Do you know how many consecutive milestones they nailed?

[-] CaptainPedantic@lemmy.world 112 points 2 years ago

Cool.

The average income in India is 25x ish less than that of the US. If we scale the $75 million cost to land on the moon by 25 times, we get $1.8 billion. The Perseverance rover's cost is estimated at $2.75 billion and that thing landed on Mars.

It's incredibly impressive that India has landed on the moon on their 2nd try. Nothing should take away from that, and India should be very proud of their achievement. But geez this is a braindead article. Yes, poorer countries can pay people less do the same amount of work as someone in another country.

[-] dejf@lemmy.world 61 points 2 years ago

I respectfully disagree with you. It's a bit misleading to compare average incomes like that. I would assume the income disparity is nowhere near as large for valuable scientists and engineers working for a national space program. In addition, you are only comparing labour costs. Some materials can be cheaper in India, but certainly not by a factor of 25 and certainly not all of them. Therefore, I wouldn't say the article is braindead.

[-] Pregnenolone@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

This comparison is predicated on every part of the manufacturing process occurring in each country. As soon as India are buying parts from other countries they’re not paying India prices anymore

[-] MyDogLovesMe@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago

Some guy at NASA: “We estimate that the cost of this part should cost 1.8Million dollars. “

Some guy in India: “You know, my cousin can make that part for 35 dollars”

These titles are dumb.

"NASA's 1969 moon landing was with a computer that can't even power Doom!"

[-] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 26 points 2 years ago

Did you know scientists created ways to use crabs as logic gates?

Someone calculated we need about 8 billion crabs in order to run Doom.

[-] zavivo@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago

Now that is scientific fact. There’s no real evidence for it, but it is scientific fact.

[-] wuddupdude@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 years ago

That's a crab fact.

[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 2 points 2 years ago

Now you're talking Nonce Sense.

[-] Player2@sopuli.xyz 11 points 2 years ago

Pretty sure that was the amount to store the files for the game, not actually run it.

[-] DudePluto@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago

They did surgery on a grape

[-] Munkisquisher@lemmy.nz 46 points 2 years ago

Yeah but interstellar went to a black hole and back

[-] wahming@lemmy.world 42 points 2 years ago

Can we not have the hundred identical stupid jokes in the comment section like we did in reddit?

[-] SlowNoPoPo@lemm.ee 53 points 2 years ago

It's a human thing not a Reddit thing

[-] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 years ago

How dare people have fun

[-] Ricaz@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 years ago

Let's also get rid of complete transcription of short videos while we're at it. Everyone else saw the video, no need to quote every part

[-] Pipoca@lemmy.world 20 points 2 years ago

Transcription is usually something done for deaf people. Like people transcribing memes for the blind.

[-] Ricaz@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago

That's not what I'm talking about. On most of the video subreddits, the whole comment section is just quotes and laughing emojis.

[-] wabafee@lemm.ee 42 points 2 years ago

Aside from different approaches I think the biggest factor is salary difference. Still impressive though a good example for other Asian nations.

[-] Amaltheamannen@lemmy.ml 30 points 2 years ago

Modern US space projects are also basically welfare programs for aerospace companies.

[-] sugarfree@lemmy.world 26 points 2 years ago
[-] rambaroo@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago

Overrated movie. I'll take real science and progress any day over imaginary nonsense that'll never happen.

[-] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago

The black hole simulation for interstellar resulted in 3 highly regarded scientific papers.

[-] kenbw2@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

I really liked the first two thirds of that film before they went into the black hole

[-] orizuru@lemmy.sdf.org 21 points 2 years ago

Bollywood should start filming on-site.

[-] TurboDiesel@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago

Nah. The bad CGI is what makes it so so good

[-] anlumo@feddit.de 9 points 2 years ago

But consider the low gravity dances!

[-] HikuNoir@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago

Some houses cost less than Indian space agency spent on getting to the Moon? That must be a typo right?

[-] afunkysongaday@lemmy.world 19 points 2 years ago

Yes and it's incredibly annoying to me. More. Some houses cost more than Indian space agency spent on getting to the moon.

[-] Decoy321@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

I mean, it's still a valid sentence. Some houses do cost less. We're just defining the word some so loosely it's almost insulting.

[-] vreraan@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

But Interstellar had a box office of $715 million.

The astronautics is a very expensive sector and with completely uncertain returns on earnings.

this post was submitted on 25 Aug 2023
680 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

73094 readers
2328 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS