680
submitted 1 year ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

India just landed on the Moon for less than it cost to make Interstellar | The Independent::undefined

all 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] SGG@lemmy.world 239 points 1 year ago

Why is this even a comparison? India only went to the moon, interstellar had to go to other freaking solar systems and a black hole to make their documentary!

[-] XTornado@lemmy.ml 49 points 1 year ago

With humans aswell and robots!

[-] blackluster117@possumpat.io 6 points 1 year ago

Robots with feelings! Do you know how many consecutive milestones they nailed?

[-] CaptainPedantic@lemmy.world 112 points 1 year ago

Cool.

The average income in India is 25x ish less than that of the US. If we scale the $75 million cost to land on the moon by 25 times, we get $1.8 billion. The Perseverance rover's cost is estimated at $2.75 billion and that thing landed on Mars.

It's incredibly impressive that India has landed on the moon on their 2nd try. Nothing should take away from that, and India should be very proud of their achievement. But geez this is a braindead article. Yes, poorer countries can pay people less do the same amount of work as someone in another country.

[-] dejf@lemmy.world 61 points 1 year ago

I respectfully disagree with you. It's a bit misleading to compare average incomes like that. I would assume the income disparity is nowhere near as large for valuable scientists and engineers working for a national space program. In addition, you are only comparing labour costs. Some materials can be cheaper in India, but certainly not by a factor of 25 and certainly not all of them. Therefore, I wouldn't say the article is braindead.

[-] Pregnenolone@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

This comparison is predicated on every part of the manufacturing process occurring in each country. As soon as India are buying parts from other countries they’re not paying India prices anymore

[-] MyDogLovesMe@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

Some guy at NASA: “We estimate that the cost of this part should cost 1.8Million dollars. “

Some guy in India: “You know, my cousin can make that part for 35 dollars”

These titles are dumb.

"NASA's 1969 moon landing was with a computer that can't even power Doom!"

[-] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 26 points 1 year ago

Did you know scientists created ways to use crabs as logic gates?

Someone calculated we need about 8 billion crabs in order to run Doom.

[-] zavivo@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Now that is scientific fact. There’s no real evidence for it, but it is scientific fact.

[-] wuddupdude@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

That's a crab fact.

[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 2 points 1 year ago

Now you're talking Nonce Sense.

[-] Player2@sopuli.xyz 11 points 1 year ago

Pretty sure that was the amount to store the files for the game, not actually run it.

[-] DudePluto@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

They did surgery on a grape

[-] Munkisquisher@lemmy.nz 46 points 1 year ago

Yeah but interstellar went to a black hole and back

[-] wabafee@lemm.ee 42 points 1 year ago

Aside from different approaches I think the biggest factor is salary difference. Still impressive though a good example for other Asian nations.

[-] Amaltheamannen@lemmy.ml 30 points 1 year ago

Modern US space projects are also basically welfare programs for aerospace companies.

[-] wahming@lemmy.world 42 points 1 year ago

Can we not have the hundred identical stupid jokes in the comment section like we did in reddit?

[-] SlowNoPoPo@lemm.ee 53 points 1 year ago

It's a human thing not a Reddit thing

[-] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago

How dare people have fun

[-] Ricaz@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

Let's also get rid of complete transcription of short videos while we're at it. Everyone else saw the video, no need to quote every part

[-] Pipoca@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

Transcription is usually something done for deaf people. Like people transcribing memes for the blind.

[-] Ricaz@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

That's not what I'm talking about. On most of the video subreddits, the whole comment section is just quotes and laughing emojis.

[-] sugarfree@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago
[-] rambaroo@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

Overrated movie. I'll take real science and progress any day over imaginary nonsense that'll never happen.

[-] lud@lemm.ee 27 points 1 year ago

A world with only "real" science and progress but without any entertainment would be quite boring.

[-] ours@lemmy.film 25 points 1 year ago

And fiction has been key to inspiring the next generation of scientists/engineers. So many NASA people have claimed to be inspired by Star Trek just to pick one.

[-] gentooer@programming.dev 9 points 1 year ago

Hey, but I managed to write software to calibrate µCT-scanners! That is clearly way more inspiring than all this fictional stuff. Right! Right. Right?

[-] meyotch@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 year ago

You bet your bippy that’s inspiring! An un-calibrated scanner just doesn’t hit the same way.

Based on the way specialized code is used, your calibration software will still be in use when they open the first scanning facility on the Moon.

Hope you accounted for the Y10K problem!

[-] gentooer@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago

Thing is that AI can help. My SO worked in a firm that does skill extraction from CVs and job ads. They do really cool stuff to match job ads with CVs using EU skill tags! It's a really good tool to do specific things, so I really hate all the latest articles about LLMs.

[-] meyotch@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I do find myself ignoring this kind of article, too, usually. I really enjoy discovering a totally new domain where the technology is implemented in a totally new way, going well beyond language applications even.

I dream of a ‘language’ model that specializes in general machine to machine communication. It almost surely exists already, but in my line of work, machine interfacing is an endless nightmare. A ‘protocol droid’ would be such a help.

[-] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

The black hole simulation for interstellar resulted in 3 highly regarded scientific papers.

[-] kenbw2@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I really liked the first two thirds of that film before they went into the black hole

[-] orizuru@lemmy.sdf.org 21 points 1 year ago

Bollywood should start filming on-site.

[-] TurboDiesel@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

Nah. The bad CGI is what makes it so so good

[-] anlumo@feddit.de 9 points 1 year ago

But consider the low gravity dances!

[-] HikuNoir@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

Some houses cost less than Indian space agency spent on getting to the Moon? That must be a typo right?

[-] afunkysongaday@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

Yes and it's incredibly annoying to me. More. Some houses cost more than Indian space agency spent on getting to the moon.

[-] Decoy321@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

I mean, it's still a valid sentence. Some houses do cost less. We're just defining the word some so loosely it's almost insulting.

[-] vreraan@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

But Interstellar had a box office of $715 million.

The astronautics is a very expensive sector and with completely uncertain returns on earnings.

this post was submitted on 25 Aug 2023
680 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

59056 readers
2743 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS