1160
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Akuji@leminal.space 108 points 3 months ago

Well, she's a bad owner for not taking into account the specific needs of her apex predator; like a lot of physical activity and access to a fresh Weyland-Yutani crew on a regular basis.

[-] GeeDubHayduke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 3 months ago

Yep. Exercise, discipline, then affection. In that order.

[-] pastel_de_airfryer@lemmy.eco.br 74 points 3 months ago

That's how I see pitbull owners

[-] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 107 points 3 months ago

Congrats you cracked the joke!

[-] theparadox@lemmy.world 52 points 3 months ago

I'm not an owner I'm but someone with a lot of friends that own pitbulls. Pitbulls aren't some magically special, dangerous breed that is prone to random acts of violence.

[-] Empricorn@feddit.nl 79 points 3 months ago

Any dog can snap. So why do we see proportionally more news stories about it happening with a pitbull...?

[-] theparadox@lemmy.world 25 points 3 months ago

Because their stereotype can attract shitty owners who want a badass dog but can't be assed to train or care for them.

Or they literally abuse, possibly even with dogfights, and abandon them.

[-] Empricorn@feddit.nl 34 points 3 months ago

Occam's Razor: They are known for being more dangerous because they are more dangerous.

[-] moonpiedumplings@programming.dev 12 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Abuse and mistreatment can play a large role in a dog’s aggression, and pit bulls are often subjected to such conditions. In situations like this, dogs learn to be aggressive and will bite humans as a result. However, studies have shown that pit bulls’ aggression is largely due to their living conditions, and they aren’t necessarily naturally dangerous dogs

While many pit bulls can be held responsible for dog bites, it’s also worth noting that their reputation makes people quick to blame the breed. Other dog breeds have similar physical features as pit bulls, so people assume that’s what they are.

From the very article you linked in the other comment.

Don't talk facts when your source refutes your claim.

[-] curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 3 months ago

Because most people can't identify one and use it for any mid size dog.

See: Rottweiler, doberman in previous years.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (18 replies)
[-] satans_methpipe@lemmy.world 16 points 3 months ago

Yes they are. Pitbulls are unpredictable, reactive, and strong compared to other breeds. They were selectively bred for those traits. They have to be muzzled and registered in my neighborhood.

[-] theparadox@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago

Ah yes, I see. You have made assertions that align with the typical narrative and stereotype around a breed of dogs, then demonstrated the assertion's validity by stating it is a belief held in your neighborhood.

I have completely changed my mind and will now ignore all of my own experiences and knowledge on the topic because a random person asserted a stereotype and stated that people believe and act on a stereotype. I guess that's it. Debate over.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] parody@lemmings.world 12 points 3 months ago

Do any of them meet the classic stereotype when it comes to like licking infants’ faces n stuff? No offense to your buddies of course!

The trope would be something like:

MY loving family pet (ADescendantOfWolvesWithABiteForceOf230PoundsPerSquareInch) would never hurt a fly

(Of course it’s just a different risk tolerance like we all have with all kinds of things)

[-] theparadox@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

None of them have kids, but I've spent a lot of time around my friends and their dogs. They are just dogs. Many of them are extremely affectionate. When I was a kid my family had a German Shepherd with showdog lineage and my mother had a lifetime of experience of owning and training dogs. Our shepherd exhibited substantially more aggression than any of my friends' pitbulls.

Yes, big, strong dogs can do more harm than smaller dogs and pitbulls can be big and strong. That does make them capable of being more dangerous if something goes wrong. I can't argue with that. However, the mentality is that pitbulls are inherently violent or behave violently by natur is what I call bullshit on.

Pitbulls are regarded as dangerous and vicious. They are also abused and subjected to fighting by their owners because that is their reputation. It's so fucked up. Then, bad owners want a scary dog, treat it poorly, don't train it and when it acts like any mistreated, traumatized animal would the world declares it inherently violent. There is such a thing as a self fulfilling prophecy.

Hell, one friend has a pit mix that is like < 30 lbs, full grown. I've never seen it do anything any other dog wouldn't do. Still, he's extremely careful with it because of the prejudice people have against the breed. Once I was hiking with him and another man with his own dog crossed our path. My friend stepped off the path and kept the dog seated and on a short leash in an attempt to reassure the guy well before he got close to us. The guy immediately asked my friend if his dog was a pitbull and berated him as he passed, furious that my friend would be irresponsible enough to own a pitbull.

Many of the people in this thread remind me of that man.

Another story. One of my coworkers paid thousands of dollars in vet bills for their neighbor in order to stop them from trying to get my coworkers dog put down (and it wasn't one of those "scary" breeds). All because the neighbors small, aggressive dog charged the bigger dog. In its attempt to get away, the bigger dog scrambled and accidentally stepped on the smaller dog and injured it. A poorly trained, off leash small dog almost cost a perfectly average dog it's life because the owners didn't bother to restrain it... but the bad owners made out in the end.

One last story. I was hiking with the tankiest, strongest pitbull of all the ones I know. This guy doesn't want anything to do with other dogs. It's not aggressive - it's frightened. We came across another hiker with their dog... the hiker said his dog was friendly and my friend immediately stated that their dog wasn't interested in making new friends. The hiker ignored the statement and let go of their dog's leash, letting the dog rush the pitbull tank barking and running circles around it. The pitbull panicked and couldn't get away and my friend had to try to keep the other dog away from the pitbull for the pitbull's sake. No harm was done beyond a poor, stressed out pitbull and a pissed off friend.

Should pitbulls exist? I'm indifferent, especially when it comes to purebreds. That doesn't mean that I want them exterminated or left to rot in shelters. Just let dogs be dogs. Try to make sure puppies come out healthy and worry less about whether they look the way you want them to.

[-] jerkface@lemmy.ca 9 points 3 months ago

Even if they were psychologically identical to every other dog, they still have bodies that were specifically engineered to fuck up human beings. When a lap dog freaks out, you get a boo boo. If that lap dog had a pit bull's body, you might be dead.

Sorry you feel personally attacked when someone says pitbulls are dangerous.

[-] theparadox@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago

Even if they were psychologically identical to every other dog

That's literally my point - they basically are. I won't argue that pitbulls are more capable of harming someone due to their physical characteristics. That's just physics.

Horses are also large, powerful animals and they cause at least a few deaths every year by trampling or kicking humans when provoked, spooked, startled, or whatever - I'm not really a horse person. Obviously, large powerful animals can absolutely cause more damage than lap-sized animals. That doesn't mean they are the equivalent of a monster from a horror movie that could rip someone to shreds at any moment with no provocation. Not does it mean that anyone who owns one is an irresponsible, naive threat to society.

If you are a responsible owner, the dog or horse isn't an unreasonable danger.

Sorry you feel personally attacked when someone says pitbulls are dangerous.

I don't feel personally attacked, but many other people feel personally attacked when someone questions their opinion on pitbulls. I just feel bad for the animals.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] AI_toothbrush@lemmy.zip 39 points 3 months ago

As someone whos dog got killed by a pitbull and i got injured trying to save her a very pleasant you can suck my big sweaty cock to all pitbull owners. Without a license and training you shouldnt be able to own a dog that is meant for killing. Ever since that every time i see a big dog the first thing i think of is if it attacks me how can i kill that fucker. So yeah i dont give a fuck and even before that happened i supported the ban of those dogs because multiple times ive heard from distant family and friends horror stories about attacks. I know a girl who was 8 when she was attacked and she needed plastic surgery all over her thigh and face after an attack and my sister and mom(whos thankfully a doctor so she could help before the ambulance arrived) were there to witness it. I dont think you wanting to own a big dog is a reason to endager others health and lives. Anyone supporting the right to own one of those killing machines is off the rails. They are literally bread to kill.

[-] frog_brawler@lemmy.world 21 points 3 months ago

The Venn diagram of people who own pit bulls and people that own lifted trucks that they can’t drive is almost a circle.

[-] CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world 17 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I think its a pretty vicious cycle.

  • Assholes think big dog is cool.
  • Assholes raise asshole dog.
  • Dog becomes known as dangerous and even more popular with assholes while people who would make good owners now steer clear.
  • Repeat.
[-] zalgotext@sh.itjust.works 10 points 3 months ago
[-] sploosh@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago

Those of us who have adopted and loved pitbulls for their entire doggie lives know that pitties aren't inherently violent. People who have been victimized as a result of people's mistreatment of these very powerful dogs don't know that.

Liberal Portland, Oregon is filled with pitbulls, but it is not filled with lifted trucks. The city is just aware of how great they can be when you don't abuse them into being bad citizens.

My pit died last year at old age from cancer. He was a sweetie who never did anything violent. We have a puppy now (corgi mix, hilarious clown of a dog), but I still miss my lunkhead every day. There's something different about them and the way they need to cuddle at every moment of the day.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] satans_methpipe@lemmy.world 27 points 3 months ago

The white trash potato caricature is hilarious. Pit bulls are a dangerous breed. They were selectively bred by humans for their aggression, unpredictability, jaw strength, overall strength, pain tolerance, etc.

I live in a poor area that is full of these dogs. The issue is exacerbated so much by people with nothing to their name so they need a status symbol to appear tough. It's really sad.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 23 points 3 months ago

Do you think those people who feel the need to have a certain type of dog to look tough might also treat that dog a certain way to make it aggressive?

[-] JustAnotherKay@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago

To piggyback, there's a reason these animals are referred to as "the nursery dog" too. Pit bulls are incredibly sweet and protective. They will take care of your children as long as you treat them right

[-] InputZero@lemmy.world 19 points 3 months ago

True but also not true. Pitbulls are a very deceiving risk. With a properly trained pitbull and owner the pitbull is unlikely to cause an injury, however if it does the injury is critical or lethal. Low chance, high impact. There are tons of stories about children being killed by their pitbull because today was the unlucky day that part of the pitbulls brain triggered and they went for the kill. It's irresponsible to own a pitbull if you have small children. Pitbulls are great, although they're a very challan dog to own which requires a diligent owner.

[-] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago

Until they snap and will attack your children out of the blue. So many stories of good owners with well behaving pit bulls that attack their owners.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago

I have no real comment on the aggressiveness of pitbulls. I have a dog we think is a dalmatian/pitbull mix and she's terrified of pretty much any humans other than us and a handful of others (she is especially afraid of men), which might look like aggression from a distance, but she would run away the second they got closer to her.

On the other hand, she's a serial killer of small animals and she recently got in a fight with our other dog (she's 11 and grumpy and in pain from bad arthritis) and tore his ear. So she certainly can be aggressive.

On the other hand, we used to have a roommate with a purebred dalmation and she was super aggressive.

So is the aggression she does show because of the pitbull part of the mix? The dalmatian part? Is it just her? I have no idea.

I do know I found a dog at the shelter who needed a loving home and I gave it to her. Which is the only way anyone should get a dog at this point.

[-] CaptnNMorgan@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago

Dalmatian are usually way more aggressive than pits.They're a lot more rare than pits, so the statistics wouldn't show that, but I've been in the dog grooming industry for almost 4 years and Dalmatian are WAY more likely to be crazy.

It's never been about the breed, some people just shouldn't have dogs.

Is it scarier when a pitbull snaps, than when a Chihuahua snaps? Absolutely! But if your dog snaps at people and other dogs, it doesn't matter what breed it is, if you aren't willing to train them to not snap, you're a bad dog owner!

This thread is full of racist people who think it's okay to be openly racist when it's not about humans. If your dog was killed by a pit and you blame the dog instead of the owner, guess what? You're an idiot and you were probably a bad dog owner too. Some people get lucky and don't have to do anything for their dog to behave, but that doesn't mean they're good owners.

[-] Cataphract@lemmy.ml 12 points 3 months ago

I always get confused for a few moments when I see these dog breed/ghetto hatred comments, but then I realize it's just steeped in closeted racism/classism. It's really sad.

[-] samus12345@lemm.ee 27 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

If we did domesticate xenomorphs, we'd have to make artificial "hosts" for the facehuggers to implant an egg in. Since the xenos apparently incorporate some DNA from the host, we could even make custom ones!

[-] Qwazpoi@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago

Alien 3 already has one that came from an ox (or dog depending on which cut of the movie) so at least it doesn't need to be from people. Honestly aside from that they don't really get into the interesting DNA combination stuff too much. Could be cool for one that's like a breed of dog all specialized and whatnot.

Now I'm curious if a Chihuahua alien would be more aggressive than a regular Chihuahua or not

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] x00z@lemmy.world 26 points 3 months ago

It's only legal to make an attack dog if the cops own the dog.

[-] Lumiluz@slrpnk.net 26 points 3 months ago

Don't know much about this, but some experts have this to say on Pitbulls: https://www.msn.com/en-us/lifestyle/pets/are-pit-bulls-dangerous-experts-set-the-record-straight-on-these-lovable-dogs/ar-AA1nG7F5

Out of curiosity, I tried looking up info on the attack/fatality rate of pitbulls outside of the USA (assuming Pitbulls are dangerous because the culture of the USA views them as such and this they are raised to be) but couldn't find much.

The only one I found quickly was that they gave a high incidence of attacks in Japan as well, but the owners tend to be Yakuza or other gang members, so yeaaahhh...

[-] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 20 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

People calling for the culling of all put bulls would be hypocritical if they don't also call for the culling of all German Shepherds. It's a difference in attack rare of 21% for pit bulls and 18% for German shepherds so pretty close in "danger" (https://www.forbes.com/advisor/legal/dog-attack-statistics-breed/)

I doubt they would though as I believe most just have a bias against pitties.

[-] nahostdeutschland@feddit.org 10 points 3 months ago

German shepherds shouldn't be bred at all. They have genetic defects that make them suspect to certain illnesses, such as hip defects. Don't buy them. They will suffer and you will have an expensive vet bill.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] GooberEar@lemmy.wtf 20 points 3 months ago

I'm an owner of a rescue dog with behavioral problems, and I am fortunate to say that the only person my dog has ever bitten after I adopter her is me. It takes a lot of work and effort, and I am absolutely certain she would bite other people under the right circumstances. Problem is, most dog owners are not like me.

Granted my rescue dog is a small Chihuahua mix, so at worse, she might break skin on your finger or heels and leave a small scar.

Very different circumstances than if she were a big dog.

[-] psychosaga303@lemm.ee 15 points 3 months ago

So you do blame the breed then? Are you stupid?

[-] EffortlessEffluvium@lemm.ee 14 points 3 months ago

Happiness is a warm ~~gun~~ face hug!

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 20 Feb 2025
1160 points (100.0% liked)

Comic Strips

16695 readers
2160 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS