1597
Yes please (lemm.ee)
(page 2) 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Zeppo@sh.itjust.works 30 points 1 week ago

I’d like for where I lived in Denver to be simply walkable. Or safely bikable. I was living in a pretty urban area in SW Denver proper and my car was lost to a collision, so I started walking everywhere. Great area for that, theoretically - I was surrounded by Asian and Central American markets, convenience stores, liquor stores, dispensaries, local restaurants, all within about a mile. However, the major roads nearby were stroads. Crossing at crosswalks was much more dangerous than just wiring for cars to disperse and running across in the middle of the block.

Worse though, I was near a kinda fun hipster shopping and bar area, but there was this horrific freeway/highway/stroad exchange where you had to go across something like 6 roads and exit ramps. It was the most pedestrian unfriendly thing I’d ever seen, and coincidentally it divided a more affluent white section of town from the Hispanic area.

[-] Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

"Coincidentally"

[-] ArmoredThirteen@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 week ago

I think Denver is the least walkable city I've ever been in. Was there a few years back and was floored by how hard it was to get anywhere as a tourist without a ride share

[-] Zeppo@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago

Really depends on the part of town. It definitely wasn't built with pedestrian or bicycle access in mind when Denver expanded in the 60s-80s, but no city in the US was back then, really. If you're in a dense area like Cap Hill, it's great. Overall Denver is set up the same as most western cities, like LA, Phoenix, Albuquerque, but for the most part is better than those. If you want something really horrible try suburbs of Houston where they don't even have sidewalks.

[-] CuddlyCassowary@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

I live in downtown Denver and haven’t driven in 12+ years, and rarely (maybe 4x a year) use rideshares. I’m not sure where your plans took you, but there are many of us living comfortably in Denver without a car.

[-] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

I mean I can want two things.

Not having to drive myself to the hospital in a minor emergency where I'm alone would be nice, but even the friends and family discount at the local ambulance company is too expensive.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] umbrella@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

in my country during the day, you dont need to check schedules.

but then public transit is slow, uncomfortable and expensive.

they just made it frequent and to cover a big area because most of us cant afford cars but they still need us to get to work.

[-] the_doktor@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I want something that takes me straight to my destination so my hurting ass self doesn't have to walk far. Driven by me so I won't get motion sickness. With a trunk so I can put a bunch of crap in there and not have to carry it all the way back while walking and riding a goddamn train.

Oh, right, I want cars. Anything else is short-sighted and ableist. I'm sure you're going to hate me and mod me down and silence me and all sorts of crap for this viewpoint, but holy fuck, how do you not understand that this is a perfectly valid view? If you're special and can walk and carry tons of shit, good on you, I'm so proud of you. Many are not. And when you destroy the ability to drive and park somewhere in your urban "utopias" because they cater to your special ass, it screws US over.

[-] Lemminary@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Wait, but both can coexist. This post is only hoping to abolish the "cars as default" mentality as it says. And it's not even a utopian dream when many places have both options readily available and well-furnished. I think you're going off without need there. But honestly, valid points. Some people do need personal vehicles and it's good to aim for a comprehensive view of transportation.

[-] WordBox@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

Nah it's your attitude that will be hated and "modded down".

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] mrodri89@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 week ago

Please Colorado ffs connect our major cities.

[-] Echolynx@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

If Colorado expands public transit, it would be too OP. /j

[-] CounselingTechie@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 week ago

Maybe if they did then they'd actually remember there is more to Colorado than just Denver area, sincerely, someone who lives an hour and half south of Pueblo.

[-] DrDickHandler@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

You are going to get cities that allow oligarchs to extract as much money as possible from you. That's what you are going to get.

[-] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago

That's great. If you are in the US it isn't going to happen at a meaningful scale. Best we can do is larger scale self driving mini busses for public transport and single user self driving vehicles for expediancies. Use existing infrastructure but work to eliminate human driving (save that for track driving for pleasure) and enforce heavy pedestrian priorities so foot traffic and bicycling becomes easier and safer.

[-] houseofleft@slrpnk.net 10 points 1 week ago

I've heard this said a lot, and I'm not necessarily doubting its true, but what's the reason behind the richest country in the world not being able to build good public transport? Large countries like China yave good public transport, and the continent of Europe has great trains- is it just the USA's size combined with its lack of public infrastructure in general?

[-] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 6 points 1 week ago

All the wealth is concentrated in the hands of selfish pricks who don't give a shit. Why advocate for high speed rail when you have a private jet?

Also making people waste time in traffic is probably good for the ownership class. You're not organizing if you're stuck in your car.

[-] rabber@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 week ago

Low taxes so nothing goes to infrastructure

[-] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago

It's the fact that our cities were built around cars. Kinda bad timing really.

[-] LwL@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

Many european cities were too, after they got leveled in ww2. Changing that is possible, but it requires actually starting.

[-] desktop_user 2 points 1 week ago

unless the trains could use the existing land building the rail would be extremely costly due in part to the slowness of emminent domain and the us actually having functional property rights that make it hard to take land from people (those that can afford lawyers). coupled with the large number of citys with populations under 100,000 buses are generally going to work better here.

[-] GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 week ago

If you are in the US it isn't going to happen at a meaningful scale.

Your defeatism mindset is a large part of why it's not happening right now. Stop posting this shit so that progress can actually be made.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] merc@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago

It might happen. Manhattan just introduced congestion charges and it apparently made a big difference.

And places that we now think of as bike and public transit focused cities in Europe were very car-centric in the 70s. I don't know why or how they changed, but they did.

[-] Nougat@fedia.io 3 points 1 week ago
[-] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 15 Feb 2025
1597 points (100.0% liked)

Public Transport

332 readers
143 users here now

Everything about public transportation!

founded 2 months ago
MODERATORS