I hate CSS, my brain just can't seem to wrap itself around a flexbox
flex-wrap: brain-wrap;
flex-wrap: just-do-what-i-fucking-want-i-swear-to-god;
Honestly, same
ive never seen CSS used in this context. Im assuming you mean proprietary software (Closed Source Software?)
Yeah I meant that vs OSS
CSS usually means cascading style sheets, used for web pages styling. Just FYI.
I will literally use a software that’s way worse just so I don’t have to worry about my data being sold.
That’s me as well.
I don't care much about 'open source' by itself. That's just a way to share code and workload between devs. I'm not a dev, I'm barely much of a geek (but I did wrote a few Bash scripts, does that qualify? ;)
I care a lot more about the software being Free/Libre.
I moved to Linux because of the GNU and because of its focus on, well, user freedoms. Also, because I care about privacy and worry to see how quickly it's being eaten away.
So, I always favor a Libre software over a proprietary one, even if it lacks certain features. But I'm not against using something proprietary when I have to.
The last three jobs I’ve had were FOSS software companies. I help move organizations large and small off of closed source software.
I love FOSS because anyone in the world could contribute and make a better software for everyone! only this is the work that could be done worldwide. ( I can't think of anything else but feel free to tell me if you know)
I prefer FOSS but I will use others if there's nothing FOSS that fits my needs.
Where the F/OSS stuff is "good enough" I use it. Where it isn't good enough, I don't.
This is pretty much how I deal with everything. Ideology in tools is a weird thing to me. Computers are a tool I use to perform the tasks I want to perform. I use what works.
Thus it is that I use Windows 10 (non-F/OSS), LibreOffice at home (F/OSS), a mix of LibreOffice and WPS Office (non-F/OSS) at work, Zen (F/OSS) as my browser except for those extremely rare circumstances where a web site doesn't work in Zen, Taobao (non-F/OSS) and AliPay (non-F/OSS) for shopping, etc. etc. etc. These are all "good enough" for my needs while keeping my costs down.
Now the recent US trade idiocy is changing some of that calculus and from this point onward I won't buy commercial software from an American company any longer; I'd rather do without than buy American, so perhaps some ideology gets involved, but that's a very recent "innovation" for me.
Im like this and I totally drank the foss cool aid after hearing stallman talk. But yeah at the end of the day I do things based on usability. Heck I only recently started using linux and I stuck to windows partially do to keeping myself and my wife on the same thing but windows 11 was just to much. I sorta wish I did it earlier to show her how functional it is sooner.
Me, not a purist, but heavily prefer FOSS. My wife does use a proprietary Linux scanner app but that is it. On Android about 14% of my apps are proprietary.
Foss everything. I've spent years making sure I stay private and never see ads, and never pay for convenience. There is a free version of literally everything that people use, it just takes a little bit of effort.
Fediverse for social media, Foss alternatives for professional use, and I hack every device I own.
Casual Conversation
Share a story, ask a question, or start a conversation about (almost) anything you desire. Maybe you'll make some friends in the process.
RULES (updated 01/22/25)
- Be respectful: no harassment, hate speech, bigotry, and/or trolling. To be concise, disrespect is defined by escalation.
- Encourage conversation in your OP. This means including heavily implicative subject matter when you can and also engaging in your thread when possible. You won't be punished for trying.
- Avoid controversial topics (politics or societal debates come to mind, though we are not saying not to talk about anything that resembles these). There's a guide in the protocol book offered as a mod model that can be used for that; it's vague until you realize it was made for things like the rule in question. At least four purple answers must apply to a "controversial" message for it to be allowed.
- Keep it clean and SFW: No illegal content or anything gross and inappropriate. A rule of thumb is if a recording of a conversation put on another platform would get someone a COPPA violation response, that exact exchange should be avoided when possible.
- No solicitation such as ads, promotional content, spam, surveys etc. The chart redirected to above applies to spam material as well, which is one of the reasons its wording is vague, as it applies to a few things. Again, a "spammy" message must be applicable to four purple answers before it's allowed.
- Respect privacy as well as truth: Don’t ask for or share any personal information or slander anyone. A rule of thumb is if something is enough info to go by that it "would be a copyright violation if the info was art" as another group put it, or that it alone can be used to narrow someone down to 150 physical humans (Dunbar's Number) or less, it's considered an excess breach of privacy. Slander is defined by intentional utilitarian misguidance at the expense (positive or negative) of a sentient entity. This often links back to or mixes with rule one, which implies, for example, that even something that is true can still amount to what slander is trying to achieve, and that will be looked down upon.
Casual conversation communities:
Related discussion-focused communities
- !actual_discussion@lemmy.ca
- !askmenover30@lemm.ee
- !dads@feddit.uk
- !letstalkaboutgames@feddit.uk
- !movies@lemm.ee