@Hotznplotzn Wonder if COPILOT has been probed for cybersecurity and privacy issues. Very proud of my first reply to a Lemmy!

Only the NSA is allowed in this arse!!!

Meanwhile our governments services and tenders practically demand US software and services provided by US companies on US controlled hosting. I haven't seen any good use for LLMs beyond being an amusement but downloading the Deepseek model to run locally is absolutely safe and local models is all anyone should be using with any data where they have a responsibility, ethical or legal, to maintain privacy and security. And it you are doing things properly and everything is local then Deepseek reportedly has some efficiency advantages that make it worth considering over alternatives.

Preventing exfiltration of Australian data to foreign jurisdictions is absolutely the correct thing to do but block OpenAI and Microsoft and other US companies as well. Once again Australia does whatever its told. I kind of understand when it is the mining barrons or real estate developers given they do at least make some economic contribution to the country. But I have no idea why we suck off US tech bros when all they do is lower our productivity by addicting us to crap products, corrupt our democracy and extort rent from us for the privilege.

And yet Copilot is busy burrowing into the flesh of the government like a growing hookworm, a large swathe of big business is simply trusting to Microsoft's: "Oh no we keep your data entirely seperate and safe. We don't use it to train the LLM, pinky promise." Whilst ChatGPT keeps showing up in the hands of the most clueless people, "Oh I gave it all my personal info so it could rewrite my resume. How great is AI!"

I feel like this could be solved immediately and easily, make every privacy breach by any company subject to a fine totalling a single digit percentage of global turnover of the company. So for each privacy breach where Copilot is involved that will be... say... 3 billion dollars. They would yank their "AI Solution" from the local market so quickly you would hear a cracking sound.

We got an email at work not to use DeepSeek. And yeah, it's funny how all the western malware is completely fine

Again i ask the question: why am i left with the perception that end users have the ability to acess or install this in the workplace in the first place.

Any IT department worth it's paycheque would already have everything locked down to hell. I work with a lot of local councils and they've grasped this concept, why hasn't the federal government?

You'd have to be mad to put important information into any AI model unless you're hosting it locally and know it isn't sending info anywhere (the latter being the hard part to verify). All of the online AI services really should be blocked if departments/companies are taking security seriously.

no shit! that this even needed to be said is concerning.

The APS has pretty clear policies on the use of these tools in general. Some experiments are being run but largely policy is "no, it's a liability nightmare"

This is the service that is banned, not the model itself, right?