58
submitted 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) by mwguy@infosec.exchange to c/usa@lemmy.ml

@usa Mexican president reveals U.S. concession Trump failed to mention as tariffs paused

https://www.rawstory.com/trump-mexico-guns/

Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum Pardo issued a "read-out" of her call with U.S. President Donald Trump on Monday — but her list of what the two leaders agreed to is different from his in one major respect: guns.

Washington Post staff writer Meryl Kornfield pointed out on X that in Sheinbaum's list of things the U.S. had committed to do is stop the flow of guns into Mexico.

top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] djsoren19 8 points 18 hours ago

I have a very hard time imagining Trump will keep his word, but you gotta respect Sheinbaum for getting as much as she could. Trump might be feeling very pro gun control now that he's in power though, so maybe there's hope for a broader deal to help secure Mexico's border from the flow of illegal American firearms.

[-] Death_Equity@lemmy.world 3 points 14 hours ago

All he has to do is direct the ABC boys to stop running guns to Mexico to fund their black budgets and that would cut down on guns going there, if they comply. Add to that securing the border, the flow of guns going south would be reduced in very meaningful ways.

Not that the cartels really need US guns, the black market is flush with firearms.

My guess is Trump believed he could deliver with just securing the border and has no idea about the government gun runners. He probably threw that out there as a freebie to add leverage, because securing the border would have the downstream effect of less gun running with zero extra effort.

[-] JOMusic@lemmy.ml 9 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

Even though emotionally, I wanted Mexico and Canada to keep their tariffs to not take Trump's crap. I have a feeling history will look back on Sheinbaum as incredibly tactful, especially giving Mexico buffer to diversify their reliances.

[-] mwguy@infosec.exchange 3 points 20 hours ago

@JOMusic It's actually a pretty big concession Trump gave up. Theoretically we're not allowed to restrict the flow of firearms out of the country because of the 2nd Amendment. So it opens up a whole can of worms as to how legally we'll restrict that flow of weapons (or even if we can).

[-] alexc@lemmy.world 9 points 20 hours ago

Is that what the second amendment says? I thought it was the right of citizens to bear arms.

Not sure how that would be related to sending the guns to Mexico?

Also, not an American and clearly not a constitutional lawyer…

[-] mwguy@infosec.exchange 2 points 20 hours ago

@alexc It's citizens that bring those Guns into Mexico. It's legal to do so until they've crossed into Mexico. So in theory if we see you on the US side of the border heading into Mexico with a nominally legal weapon, we're not suppose to stop you.

Trump essentially promised that this would change. Which is a pretty big deal as that's how a lot of guns come into Mexico for the Cartels.

[-] alexc@lemmy.world 4 points 19 hours ago

I didn’t realize that was possible…

[-] mwguy@infosec.exchange 2 points 19 hours ago

@alexc To cross the border with a gun?

[-] alexc@lemmy.world 4 points 19 hours ago

The Canadian border (where I live) has signs literally everywhere stating you cannot cross the border with a gun. I just assumed it was the same everywhere. Color me stupid…

[-] mwguy@infosec.exchange 1 points 19 hours ago

@alexc Yes but the US doesn't prevent you from that and won't jail you for that. Canada enforces that law.

[-] whostosay@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago

Even if that's the case, a sign alone ain't gonna do shit.

this post was submitted on 03 Feb 2025
58 points (100.0% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7477 readers
334 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS