38
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] RangerJosey@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 week ago

Wouldn't expect the sales of Swasticars to improve any time soon.

[-] GalacticGrapefruit@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

Good! Tesla deserves far worse!

[-] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago

checks stock

It's up

Yep, this article is obviously pushing an agenda. People who are willing to put their money on their opinion think otherwise.

I'm expecting the federal government to find an urgent need for a large number of Tesla vehicles in the near future. Bypass the consumer and send their money directly to nazi man.

[-] MothmanDelorian@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Are you under the impression that the stock market is rational?

[-] salmoura@lemmy.eco.br 3 points 1 week ago

Specially in the short term.

[-] copacetic@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 week ago

That means the numbers were not worse than expected. It was always priced in.

[-] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

"Priced in" is the proven false idea that markets are rational. Warren Buffet couldn't have become a billionaire if "priced in" was true. Because otherwise there would never be undervalued companies to purchase.

[-] copacetic@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The efficient market hypothesis does not claim anything about “rational”.

[-] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

I'll amend my statement. If markets were actually efficient then Warren Buffet couldn't have become a billionaire because everything would have already been "priced in".

[-] copacetic@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 week ago

This paper concludes that Buffett did essentially do factor-investing.

I don't really understand why the efficient market hypothesis (EMH) and factor investing don't contradict each other but smarter people think they don't (e.g. Fama who co-invented both). The general consensus seems to be that the weak form of EMH is correct but the semi-strong and the strong EMH probably not. However, while markets may not be perfectly efficient they can still be very close. This is why I believe that "priced in" often works in practice and is a useful concept.

this post was submitted on 30 Jan 2025
38 points (100.0% liked)

Automotive Industry

448 readers
19 users here now

News and discussion about the automotive industry.

Maybe also interesting:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS