770
submitted 1 week ago by Irelephant@lemm.ee to c/firefox@lemmy.ml
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] BriNet@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Seems rather desperate 🙃

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 week ago

It honestly might be true

Firefox and Brave both suck a bit in terms of privacy. They could be worse but they also could be way better.

[-] irreticent@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Firefox and Brave both suck a bit in terms of privacy.

Okay, I'll bite: how does Firefox suck in terms of privacy?

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago

The main problem is the telemetry and targeted advertising.

However, it also could have a bit better defaults from a fingerprinting resistance perspective.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] 3dmvr@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago

Braves like the only browser that works for some piracy sites, the rest (with extensions) you get a ton of ads, broken sitesx or get stuck at some link shorteners. Vfx med specifically I tried every browser. For regular browsing I like firefox but annoyingly enough brave handles video a lot better never crashing, youtube is always fast with hella tabs, I'm just used to and stuck with firefox because I have so many tabs/windows open rnow

[-] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 1 points 1 week ago

I dont like brave for other reasons, but this is definitely a good look. Tor Browser has to patch a lot of issues to make Firefox safe

[-] Irelephant@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago

Its safe without tors changes, those are to make it anonymous, which neither brave nor chrome do.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 27 Jan 2025
770 points (100.0% liked)

Firefox

18452 readers
24 users here now

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS