874

cross-posted from: https://lemm.ee/post/53805638

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 150 points 1 week ago

Good. That shit is way overvalued.

There is no way that Nvidia are worth 3 times as much as TSMC, the company that makes all their shit and more besides.

I'm sure some of my market tracker funds will lose value, and they should, because they should never have been worth this much to start with.

[-] CleoTheWizard@lemmy.world 51 points 1 week ago

It’s because Nvidia is an American company and also because they make final stage products. American companies right now are all overinflated and almost none of the stocks are worth what they’re at because of foreign trading influence.

As much as people whine about inflation here, the US didn’t get hit as bad as many other countries and we recovered quickly which means that there is a lot of incentive for other countries to invest here. They pick our top movers, they invest in those. What you’re seeing is people bandwagoning onto certain stocks because the consistent gains create more consistent gains for them.

The other part is that yes, companies who make products at the end stage tend to be worth a lot more than people trading more fundamental resources or parts. This is true of almost every industry except oil.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] barsoap@lemm.ee 131 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Shovel vendors scrambling for solid ground as prospectors start to understand geology.

...that is, this isn't yet the end of the AI bubble. It's just the end of overvaluing hardware because efficiency increased on the software side, there's still a whole software-side bubble to contend with.

[-] theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago

there's still a whole software-side bubble to contend with

They're ultimately linked together in some ways (not all). OpenAI has already been losing money on every GPT subscription that they charge a premium for because they had the best product, now that premium must evaporate because there are equivalent AI products on the market that are much cheaper. This will shake things up on the software side too. They probably need more hype to stay afloat

[-] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago

Quick, wedge crypto in there somehow! That should buy us at least two more rounds of investment.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (19 replies)
[-] drascus@sh.itjust.works 72 points 1 week ago

Okay seriously this technology still baffles me. Like its cool but why invest so much in an unknown like AIs future ? We could invest in people and education and end up with really smart people. For the cost of an education we could end up with smart people who contribute to the economy and society. Instead we are dumping billions into this shit.

[-] FightToAdapt@slrpnk.net 56 points 1 week ago

Because rulling class got high on the promise that they could finally eliminate workers as a cost and be independent from us.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] sudo42@lemmy.world 35 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Tech/Wall St constantly needs something to hype in order to bring in “investor” money. The “new technology-> product development -> product -> IPO” pipeline is now “straight to pump-and-dump” (for example, see Crypto currency).

The excitement of the previous hype train (self-driving cars) is no longer bringing in starry-eyed “investors” willing to quickly part ways with OPM. “AI” made a big splash and Tech/Wall St is going to milk it for all they can lest they fall into the same bad economy as that one company that didn’t jam the letters “AI” into their investor summary.

Tech has laid off a lot of employees, which means they are aware there is nothing else exciting in the near horizon. They also know they have to flog “AI” like crazy before people figure out there’s no “there” there.

That “investors” scattered like frightened birds at the mere mention of a cheaper version means that they also know this is a bubble. Everyone wants the quick money. More importantly they don’t want to be the suckers left holding the bag.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] AppleTea@lemmy.zip 25 points 1 week ago

It's easier to sell people on the idea of a new technology or system that doesn't have any historical precedent. All you have to do is list the potential upsides.

Something like a school or a workplace training programme, those are known quantities. There's a whole bunch of historical and currently-existing projects anyone can look at to gauge the cost. Your pitch has to be somewhat realistic compared to those, or it's gonna sound really suspect.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] alvvayson@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 1 week ago

Because the silicon valley bros had convinced the national security wonks in the Beltway that it was paramount for national security, technological leadership and economic prosperity.

I think this will go down as the biggest grift in history.

Kevin Walmsley reported on Deepseek 10 days ago. Last week, the smart money exited big tech. This week the panic starts.

I'm getting big dot-com 2.0 vibes from all of this.

https://youtube.com/@inside_china_business

load more comments (26 replies)
[-] FightToAdapt@slrpnk.net 68 points 1 week ago

I think this prompted investors to ask "where's the ROI?".

Current AI investment hype isn't based on anything tangible. At least the amount of investment isn't, it is absurd to think that trillion dollars that was put in the space already, even before that Softbanks deal is going to be returned. The models still hallucinate as it is inherent to the architecture, we are nowhere near replacing the workers but we got chatbots that "when they work sometimes, then they are kind of good?" and mediocre off-putting pictures. Is there any value? Sure, it's not NFTs. But the correction might be brutal.

Interestingly enough, DeepSeek's model is released just before Q4 earning's call season, so we will see if it has a compounding effect with another statement from big players that they burned massive amount of compute and USD only to get milquetoast improvements and get owned by a small Chinese startup that allegedly can do all that for 5 mil.

[-] prof_wafflez@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

hype isn’t based on anything tangible

So just like crypto

EDIT: The crypto bros out in full force... and right on cue proudly proclaiming they don't understand the difference between the value of blockchain technology (which so far has not had a ton of real world value outside of mostly impractical database applications, other than furthering climate change and buying drugs) vs the SPECULATIVE value of coins since coins have no real value factors to back up their SPECULATIVE value. Stocks often have real value that back up their value, like company profits or products. Stop drinking kool aid to the point of literal zero critical thinking, jfc.

load more comments (34 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[-] ChiefGyk3D@infosec.pub 56 points 1 week ago

My understanding is that DeepSeek still used Nvidia just older models and way more efficiently, which was remarkable. I hope to tinker with the opensource stuff at least with a little Twitch chat bot for my streams I was already planning to do with OpenAI. Will be even more remarkable if I can run this locally.

However this is embarassing to the western companies working on AI and especially with the $500B announcement of Stargate as it proves we don't need as high end of an infrastructure to achieve the same results.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] gerryflap@feddit.nl 54 points 1 week ago

I'm so happy this happened. This is really a power move from China. The US was really riding the whole AI bubble. By "just" releasing a powerful open-source AI model they've fucked the not so open US AI companies. I'm not sure if this was planned from China or whether this is was really just a small company doing this because they wanted to, but either way this really damages the western economy. And its given western consumers a free alternative. A few million dollars invested (if we are to believe the cost figures) for a major disruption.

load more comments (27 replies)
[-] jlh@lemmy.jlh.name 45 points 1 week ago

Bizarre story. China building better LLMs and LLMs being cheaper to train does not mean that nVidia will sell less GPUs when people like Elon Musk and Donald Trump can't shut up about how important "AI" is.

I'm all for the collapse of the AI bubble, though. It's cool and all that all the bankers know IT terms now, but the massive influx of money towards LLMs and the datacenters that run them has not been healthy to the industry or the broader economy.

[-] theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It literally defeats NVIDIA's entire business model of "I shit golden eggs and I'm the only one that does and I can charge any price I want for them because you need my golden eggs"

Turns out no one actually even needs a golden egg anyway.

And... same goes for OpenAI, who were already losing money on every subscription. Now they've lost the ability to charge a premium for their service (anyone can train a GPT4 equivalent model cheaply, or use DeepSeek's existing open models) and subscription prices will need to come down, so they'll be losing money even faster

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] index@sh.itjust.works 40 points 1 week ago

It still rely on nvidia hardware why would it trigger a sell-off? Also why all media are picking up this news? I smell something fishy here...

[-] Railcar8095@lemm.ee 32 points 1 week ago

The way I understood it, it's much more efficient so it should require less hardware.

Nvidia will sell that hardware, an obscene amount of it, and line will go up. But it will go up slower than nvidia expected because anything other than infinite and always accelerating growth means you're not good at business.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] PhAzE@lemmy.ca 22 points 1 week ago

It requires only 5% of the same hardware that OpenAI needs to do the same thing. So that can mean less quantity of top end cards and it can also run on less powerful cards (not top of the line).

Should their models become standard or used more commonly, then nvidis sales will drop.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] ArchRecord@lemm.ee 18 points 1 week ago

Here's someone doing 200 tokens/s (for context, OpenAI doesn't usually get above 100) on... A Raspberry Pi.

Yes, the "$75-$120 micro computer the size of a credit card" Raspberry Pi.

If all these AI models can be run directly on users devices, or on extremely low end hardware, who needs large quantities of top of the line GPUs?

[-] aesthelete@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Thank the fucking sky fairies actually, because even if AI continues to mostly suck it'd be nice if it didn't swallow up every potable lake in the process. When this shit is efficient that makes it only mildly annoying instead of a complete shitstorm of failure.

load more comments (16 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] RubicTopaz@lemmy.world 40 points 1 week ago

Finally a proper good open source model as all tech should be

[-] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 39 points 1 week ago

Hm even with DeepSeek being more efficient, wouldn't that just mean the rich corps throw the same amount of hardware at it to achieve a better result?

In the end I'm not convinced this would even reduce hardware demand. It's funny that this of all things deflates part of the bubble.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 49 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Hm even with DeepSeek being more efficient, wouldn’t that just mean the rich corps throw the same amount of hardware at it to achieve a better result?

Only up to the point where the AI models yield value (which is already heavily speculative). If nothing else, DeepSeek makes Altman's plan for $1T in new data-centers look like overkill.

The revelation that you can get 100x gains by optimizing your code rather than throwing endless compute at your model means the value of graphics cards goes down relative to the value of PhD-tier developers. Why burn through a hundred warehouses full of cards to do what a university mathematics department can deliver in half the time?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] peereboominc@lemm.ee 14 points 1 week ago

Maybe but it also means that if a company needs a datacenter with 1000 gpu's to do it's AI tasks demand, it will now buy 500.

Next year it might need more but then AMD could have better gpu's.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] RxBrad@infosec.pub 36 points 1 week ago

Okay, cool...

So, how much longer before Nvidia stops slapping a "$500-600 RTX XX70" label on a $300 RTX XX60 product with each new generation?

The thinly-veiled 75-100% price increases aren't fun for those of us not constantly-touching-themselves over AI.

[-] Mac@mander.xyz 32 points 1 week ago

What the fuck are markets when you can automate making money on them???

Ive been WTF about the stock market for a long time but now it's obviously a scam.

[-] thistleboy@lemmy.world 45 points 1 week ago

The stock market is nothing more than a barometer for the relative peace of mind of rich people.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] daddy32@lemmy.world 29 points 1 week ago

Great, a stock sale.

[-] sith@lemmy.zip 28 points 1 week ago

Nice. Fuck you Nvidia.

[-] Teknikal@eviltoast.org 27 points 1 week ago

Was watching bbc news interview some American guy about this and wow they were really pushing that it's no big deal and deepseek is way behind and a bit of a joke. Made claims they weren't under cyber attack they just couldn't handle having traffic etc.

Kinda making me root for China honestly.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] endofline@lemmy.ca 26 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Try asking DeepSeek something about Xi Jinping. "Sorry, it's beyond my current scope' :-) Wondering why even it cannot cite his official party biography :-)

[-] comfy@lemmy.ml 21 points 1 week ago

For what it's worth, I wouldn't ask any chatbot about politics at all.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 20 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Try asking ChatGPT if Israel is committing genocide and watch it do the magical Hasbara dance around the subject.

load more comments (14 replies)
[-] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It's easy to mod the software to get rid of those censors

Part of why the US is so afraid is because anyone can download it and start modding it easily, and because the rich make less money

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago

Well, you still need the right kind of hardware to run it, and my money has been on AMD to deliver the solutions for that. Nvidia has gone full-blown stupid on the shit they are selling, and AMD is all about cost and power efficiency, plus they saw the writing on the wall for Nvidia a long time ago and started down the path for FPGA, which I think will ultimately be the same choice for running this stuff.

load more comments (22 replies)
[-] fossilesque@mander.xyz 22 points 1 week ago

I've never been so happy to cancel a subscription.

[-] AfricanGrey@lemmy.zip 19 points 1 week ago

Good. Nvidia has grown greedy and fat.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] wewbull@feddit.uk 14 points 1 week ago

With the amount governments seem to be on the AI train I'm becoming more and more worried about the fall out when the hype bubble does burst. I'm really hoping it comes sooner rather than later.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 27 Jan 2025
874 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

61774 readers
3161 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS